Abstract
Background
The purpose of this study is to analyze the clinical impact of radical nephrectomy on retroperitoneal liposarcoma near the kidney.
Methods
Data of patients who underwent surgery for unilateral primary retroperitoneal liposarcoma near the kidney were retrospectively collected. Patients were divided into four groups according to whether they underwent nephrectomy and combined resection of other organs. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used to estimate disease-free survival and overall survival. Multivariable Cox analysis was used to analyze factors related to disease-free survival and overall survival.
Results
Nephrectomy (HR = 0.260, CI = 0.078–0.873, p = 0.029) had a beneficial effect on disease-free survival, while interaction model of nephrectomy*other organ resection (HR = 4.655, CI = 1.767–12.263, p = 0.002) showed poor disease-free survival. Other organ resection was not related to disease-free survival (HR = 1.543, CI = 0.146–16.251, p = 0.718). Operation method (p = 0.007) and FNCLCC grade (p < 0.001; G2, HR = 1.833, CI = 0.684–4.915, p = 0.228; G3, HR = 9.190, CI = 3.351–25.199, p < 0.001) were significant factors for disease-free survival. While combined organ resection without nephrectomy group (HR = 1.604, CI = 0.167–15.370, p = 0.682) and radical nephrectomy with combined organ resection group (HR = 1.309, CI = 0.448–3.825, p = 0.622) did not show significant difference in disease-free survival from the mass excision only group, radical nephrectomy without combined organ resection group (HR = 0.279, CI = 0.078–0.991, p = 0.048) showed superior disease-free survival.
Conclusions
Radical nephrectomy of unilateral primary retroperitoneal liposarcoma near the kidney has a beneficial effect on disease-free survival.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- LPS:
-
Liposarcoma
- STS:
-
Soft tissue sarcoma
- RT:
-
Radiotherapy
- FNCLCC:
-
Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer
References
Gupta TKD (1970) Tumors and tumor-like conditions of the adipose tissue. Curr Probl Surg 7:3–60
Bonvalot S, Rivoire M, Castaing M et al (2009) Primary retroperitoneal sarcomas: a multivariate analysis of surgical factors associated with local control. J Clin Oncol 27:31–37
Gronchi A, Miceli R, Shurell E et al (2013) Outcome prediction in primary resected retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma: histology-specific overall survival and disease-free survival nomograms built on major sarcoma center data sets. J Clin Oncol 31:1649–1655
Lewis JJ, Leung D, Woodruff JM et al (1998) Retroperitoneal soft-tissue sarcoma: analysis of 500 patients treated and followed at a single institution. Ann Surg 228:355–365
Strauss DC, Hayes AJ, Thway K et al (2010) Surgical management of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma. Br J Surg 97:698–706
Abdelfatah E, Guzzetta AA, Nagarajan N et al (2016) Long-term outcomes in treatment of retroperitoneal sarcomas: a 15 year single-institution evaluation of prognostic features. J Surg Oncol 114:56–64
Kim HS, Lee J, Yi SY et al (2009) Liposarcoma: exploration of clinical prognostic factors for risk based stratification of therapy. BMC Cancer 9:205
Stoeckle E, Coindre JM, Bonvalot S et al (2001) Prognostic factors in retroperitoneal sarcoma: a multivariate analysis of a series of 165 patients of the French Cancer Center Federation Sarcoma Group. Cancer 92:359–368
Rosa F, Fiorillo C, Tortorelli AP et al (2016) Surgical management of retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas: role of curative resection. Am Surg 82:128–133
Stahl JM, Corso CD, Park HS et al (2017) The effect of microscopic margin status on survival in adult retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas. Eur J Surg Oncol 43:168–174
Singer S, Antonescu CR, Riedel E et al (2003) Histologic subtype and margin of resection predict pattern of recurrence and survival for retroperitoneal liposarcoma. Ann Surg 238:358–370 discussion 370–351
Toulmonde M, Bonvalot S, Ray-Coquard I et al (2014) Retroperitoneal sarcomas: patterns of care in advanced stages, prognostic factors and focus on main histological subtypes: a multicenter analysis of the French Sarcoma Group. Ann Oncol 25:730–734
Erzen D, Sencar M, Novak J (2005) Retroperitoneal sarcoma: 25 years of experience with aggressive surgical treatment at the Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana. J Surg Oncol 91:1–9
Gronchi A, Casali PG, Fiore M et al (2004) Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas: patterns of recurrence in 167 patients treated at a single institution. Cancer 100:2448–2455
Smith HG, Thomas JM, Smith MJ et al (2016) Multivisceral resection of retroperitoneal sarcomas in the elderly. Eur J Cancer 69:119–126
Bertrand MM, Carrere S, Delmond L et al (2016) Oncovascular compartmental resection for retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma with vascular involvement. J Vasc Surg 64:1033–1041
Lehnert T, Cardona S, Hinz U et al (2009) Primary and locally recurrent retroperitoneal soft-tissue sarcoma: local control and survival. Eur J Surg Oncol 35:986–993
Acknowledgements
This study was carried out with the support of Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development (Gyu Seong Choi, Project No PJ012265) Rural development administration, Republic of Korea.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest related to this study.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rhu, J., Cho, C.W., Lee, K.W. et al. Radical Nephrectomy for Primary Retroperitoneal Liposarcoma Near the Kidney has a Beneficial Effect on Disease-Free Survival. World J Surg 42, 254–262 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4157-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4157-6