Skip to main content
Log in

Collective Review of the Status of Rapid Sequence Intubation Drugs of Choice in Trauma in Low- and Middle-Income Settings (Prehospital, Emergency Department and Operating Room Setting)

  • Surgical Symposium Contribution
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Establishing a definitive airway in order to ensure adequate ventilation and oxygenation is an important aspect of resuscitation of the polytrauma patient .

Aim

To review the relevant literature that compares the different drugs used for rapid sequence intubation (RSI) of trauma patients, specifically reviewing: premedication, induction agents and neuromuscular blocking agents across the prehospital, emergency department and operating room setting, and to present the best practices based on the reviewed evidence.

Method

A literature review of rapid sequence intubation in the trauma population was carried out, specifically comparison of the drugs used (induction agent, neuromuscular blocking drugs and adjuncts).

Discussion

Studies involving the comparison of drugs used in RSI in, specifically, the trauma patient are sparse. The majority of studies have compared induction agents, etomidate, ketamine and propofol, as well as the neuromuscular blocking agents, succinylcholine and rocuronium.

Conclusion

There currently exists great variation in the practice of RSI; however, in trauma the RSI armamentarium is limited to agents that maintain hemodynamic stability, provide adequate intubating conditions in the shortest time period and do not have detrimental effects on cerebral perfusion pressure. Further, multicenter randomized controlled studies to confirm the benefits of the currently used agents in trauma are required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bernard SA, Nguyen V, Cameron P et al (2010) Prehospital rapid sequence intubation improves functional outcome for patients with severe traumatic brain injury. A randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 252:959–965

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Miraflor E, Chuan K, Miranda MA et al (2011) Timing is everything: delayed intubation is associated with increased mortality in initially stable trauma patients. J Surg Res 170:117–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Morris J, Cook TM (2001) Rapid sequence induction: a national survey of practice. Anaesthesia 56:1090–1115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Miller RD, Eriksson LI, Fleisher LA, et al (2009) Chapter 29, pharmacology of muscle relaxants and their antagonists. In: Miller’s anesthesia, vol 1, edn 7. Elsevier, United States of America, p 1924

  5. Gunning M, Perkins Z, Crilly J et al (2013) Paramedic rapid sequence induction (RSI) in a South African emergency medical service: a retrospective observational study. SAMJ 103:632–637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zed PJ, Abu-Laban RB, Harrison DW (2006) Intubating conditions and hemodynamic effects of etomidate for rapid sequence intubation in the emergency department: an observational cohort study. Acad Emerg Med 13:378–383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Deitch S, Davis DP, Schatteman J et al (2003) The use of etomidate for prehospital rapid sequence intubation. Prehosp Emerg Care 7:380–383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Choi YF, Wong TW, Lau CC (2004) Midazolam is more likely to cause hypotension than etomidate in emergency department rapid sequence intubation. Emerg Med J 21:700–702

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Baird CRW, Hay AW, McKeown DW et al (2009) Rapid sequence induction drug and outcome of patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Emerg Med J 26:576–579

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Manley G, Knudson M, Morabito M et al (2001) Hypotension, hypoxia and head injury. Arch Surg 136:1118–1123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bahn KV, James S, Henley GW et al (2012) Single-dose etomidate for intubation in the trauma patient. J Emerg Med 43:e277–e282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hardcastle T (2008) Etomidate for emergency intubation: throwing the baby out with the bathwater. S Afr J Crit Care 24:13–25

    Google Scholar 

  13. Losvik OK, Murad MK, Skjerve E et al (2015) Ketamine for prehospital trauma analgesia in a low-resource rural trauma system: a retrospective comparative study of ketamine and opiod analgesia in a ten-year cohort in Iraq. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 23:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sehdev RS, Symmons DAD, Kindl K (2006) Ketamine for rapid sequence induction in patients with head injury in the emergency department. Emerg Med Austr 18:37–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lyon RM, Perkins ZB, Chatterjee D et al (2015) Significant modification of traditional rapid sequence induction improves safety and effectiveness of pre-hospital trauma anaesthesia. Crit Care 19:134

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Jabre P, Combes X, Lapostolle F et al (2009) Etomidate versus ketamine for rapid sequence intubation in acutely ill patients: a multi centre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 25:293–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zeiler FA, Teitelbaum J, West M et al (2014) The ketamine effect on ICP in traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit Care 21:163–173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang X, Ding X et al (2014) Ketamine does not increase intracranial pressure compared with opioids: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Anesth 28:821–827

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cohen L, Athaide V et al (2015) The effect of ketamine on intracranial and cerebral perfusion pressure and health outcomes: a systemic review. Ann Emerg Med 65:43–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Miller RD, Eriksson LI, Fleisher LA, et al (2009) Chapter 72, anesthesia for Trauma. In: Miller’s anesthesia. Elsevier, United States of America, 1924, Volume 1, Edition 7

  21. Marsch SC, Steiner L, Bücher E et al (2011) Succinylcholine versus rocuronium for rapid sequence intubation in intensive care: a prospective, randomised controlled trial. Crit Care 15:R199

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Sluga M, Ummenhofer W, Studer W et al (2005) Rocuronium versus succinylcholine for rapid sequence induction of anesthesia and endotracheal intubation: a prospective, randomized trial in emergent cases. Anest Analg 101:1356–1361

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Perry JJ, Lee JS, Sillberg VA et al (2008) Rocuronium versus succinylcholine for rapid sequence induction intubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 16(2):CD002788

    Google Scholar 

  24. McCourt KC, Salmela L, Mirakhur RK et al (1998) Comparison of rocuronium and suxamethonium for use during rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia. Anaest 53:867–871

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Smith CE, Kovach B, Polk JD et al (2002) Prehospital tracheal intubating conditions during rapid sequence intubation: rocuronium versus vecronium. Air Med J 21:26–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee C, Jahr JS et al (2009) Reversal of profound neuromuscular block by sugammadex administered three minutes after rocuronium: a comparison with spontaneous recovery with succinylcholine. Anest 110:1020–1025

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mirakhur RK (2009) Sugammadex in clinical practice. Anaest 1:45–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. De Silva MJ, Roberts I, Perel P et al (2009) Patient outcome after traumatic brain injury in high-, middle- and low-income countries: analysis of data on 8927 patients in 46 countries. Int J Epidemiol 38(2):452–458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Patanwala AE, Ersatz BL, Roe DJ et al (2015) Succinylcholine is associated with increased mortality when used for rapid sequence intubation of severely brain injured patients in the emergency department. Pharmacotherapy 36:57–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Perkins ZB, Gunning M, Crilly J et al (2013) The haemodynamic response to pre-hospital RSI in injured patients. Injury 44:618–623

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Treggiari MM, Schutz N, Yanez ND et al (2007) Role of intracranial pressure values and patterns in predicting outcome in traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Neurocrit Care 6:104–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Pouraghaei M, Moharamzadeh P, Soleimanpour H et al (2014) Comparison between the effects of alfentanil, fentanyl and sufentanil on hemodynamic indices during rapid sequence intubation in the emergency department. Anest Pain Med 4:e14618

    Google Scholar 

  33. Levitt MA, Graham M, Dresden AB (2001) The efficacy of esmolol versus lidocaine to attenuate the hemodynamic response to intubation in isolated head trauma patient. Acad Emerg Med 8:19–24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Shackelford SA, Fowler M, Schultz K et al (2015) Prehospital Pain Medication Use by U.S Forces in Afghanistan. Mil Med 180:304–309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. World Health Organization (WHO) (2007) Access to controlled medicines programme (ACMP) framework. WHO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  36. Management Sciences for Health (MSH). International Drug Price Indicator Guide 2011. Available from: http://erc.msh.org/ Accessed 31 May 2016

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leressè Pillay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pillay, L., Hardcastle, T. Collective Review of the Status of Rapid Sequence Intubation Drugs of Choice in Trauma in Low- and Middle-Income Settings (Prehospital, Emergency Department and Operating Room Setting). World J Surg 41, 1184–1192 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3712-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3712-x

Keywords

Navigation