Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles to Evaluate Revegetation Success on Natural Gas Pipelines

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Appalachian region of the United States has experienced significant growth in the production of natural gas. Developing the infrastructure required to transport this resource to market creates significant disturbances across the landscape, as both well pads and transportation pipelines must be created in this mountainous terrain. Midstream infrastructure, which includes pipeline rights-of-way and associated infrastructure, can cause significant environmental degradation, especially in the form of sedimentation. The introduction of this non-point source pollutant can be detrimental to freshwater ecosystems found throughout this region. This ecological risk has necessitated the enactment of regulations related to midstream infrastructure development. Weekly, inspectors travel afoot along new pipeline rights-of-way, monitoring the re-establishment of surface vegetation and identifying failing areas for future management. The topographically challenging terrain of West Virginia makes these inspections difficult and dangerous to the hiking inspectors. We evaluated the accuracy at which unmanned aerial vehicles replicated inspector classifications to evaluate their use as a complementary tool in the pipeline inspection process. Both RGB and multispectral sensor collections were performed, and a support vector machine classification model predicting vegetation cover were made for each dataset. Using inspector defined validation plots, our research found comparable high accuracy between the two collection sensors. This technique displays the capability of augmenting the current inspection process, though it is likely that the model can be improved further. The high accuracy thus obtained suggests valuable implementation of this widely available technology in aiding these challenging inspections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

Special acknowledgment to Sam Bearinger and Lucas Kinder of the WVU Natural Resource Analysis Center who helped to fly and process the UAV imagery. This project was supported by funding from the United States Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration. And lastly, this work was also supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, McIntire Stennis project 1015672, and the West Virginia Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station.

Author Contributions

ANM collected and analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. MPS, STG and PK provided guidance for the experiment design and analysis, and provided edits for the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Funding

The research leading to these results received funding from the United States Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration under Grant Agreement No. 693JK31950007CAAP, and the United States Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Hatch under ascension number 7004979, and scientific article No: 3459 of the West Virginia Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, Morgantown.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony N. Mesa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mesa, A.N., Strager, M.P., Grushecky, S.T. et al. Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles to Evaluate Revegetation Success on Natural Gas Pipelines. Environmental Management 72, 671–681 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-023-01842-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-023-01842-9

Keywords

Navigation