Abstract
Developing conservation strategies to mitigate cumulative impacts requires the understanding of historic land use and land cover changes at the regional scale. By using a multisensory and multitemporal approach, we identified the major changes driving cumulative impacts on native vegetation in northeastern Amazon. Comparing two regions, one with mining as the key driver and another where mining is associated with other industrial activities (cellulose), we explore the land use and land cover historic dynamics and derive implications for the assessment of cumulative impacts. Transitions of forest cover to pastureland, silviculture, and urban expansion were mapped in detail over a 20-year period, revealing that silviculture growth cleared more forests than pastureland expansion when associated with pulp mill activities and kaolin mining. In contrast, in a region with gold and iron mining, pastureland expansion was more relevant, clearing mainly areas surrounding new roads. This research shows that the interplay of major mining and industrial investments can produce cumulative losses of native vegetation, depending on the associated industries and infrastructure required for the project development. Our findings emphasize that the definition of spatial and temporal boundaries for the assessment of cumulative impacts must consider different trends in impact accumulation and changes in their spatial distribution over time.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abe CA, Lobo FL, Novo EML, de M et al. (2019) Modeling the effects of land cover change on sediment concentrations in a gold-mined Amazonian basin. Reg Environ Chang 19:1801–1813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-019-01513-8
Arnesen AS, Silva TSF, Hess LL et al. (2013) Monitoring flood extent in the lower Amazon River floodplain using ALOS/PALSAR ScanSAR images. Remote Sens Environ 130:51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.10.035
Atlin C, Gibson R (2017) Lasting regional gains from non-renewable resource extraction: the role of sustainability-based cumulative effects assessment and regional planning for mining development in Canada. Extr Ind Soc 4:36–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2017.01.005
Biasotto LD, Kindel A (2018) Power lines and impacts on biodiversity: a systematic review. Environ Impact Assess Rev 71:110–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2018.04.010
Blaschke T, Hay GJ, Kelly M et al. (2014) Geographic Object-Based Image Analysis—towards a new paradigm. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 87:180–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.09.014
Braun A, Rosner HJ, Hagensieker R, Dieball S (2015) Multi-method dynamical reconstruction of the ecological impact of copper mining on Chinese historical landscapes. Ecol Modell 303:42–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.02.013
Bridge G (2004) Contested terrain: mining and the environment. Annu Rev Environ Resour 29:205–259. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.28.011503.163434
Broderick M, Durning B, Sánchez LE (2018) Cumulative effects. In: Methods of environmental and social impact, 4 Ed. Routledge, London, p 724
Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (2014) Canada-wide definitions and principles for cumulative effects
Curtis PG, Slay CM, Harris NL, et al. (2018) Classifying drivers of global forest loss. 361:1108–1111. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau3445
Dibo APA, Noble BF, Sánchez LE (2018) Perspectives on driving changes in project-based cumulative effects assessment for biodiversity: lessons from the canadian experience. Environ Manage 62:929–941. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1086-6
Dubé MG, Duinker P, Greig L et al. (2013) A framework for assessing cumulative effects in watersheds: an introduction to Canadian case studies. Integr Environ Assess Manag 9:363–369. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.1418
Duinker PN, Burbidge EL, Boardley SR, Greig LA (2012) Scientific dimensions of cumulative effects assessment: toward improvements in guidance for practice. Environ Rev 52:121029052013006. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2012-0035
ESRI (Environmental Systems Research Institute) (2021) ArcMap 10.8.1. https://www.esri.com/en-us/home
Fagiewicz K (2014) Spatial processes of landscape transformation in mining areas (Case study of opencast lignite mines in Morzysław, Niesłusz, Gosławice). Polish J Environ Stud 23:1123–1136
Fernandes GW, Barbosa NPU, Alberton B, et al. (2018) The deadly route to collapse and the uncertain fate of Brazilian rupestrian grasslands. Biodivers Conserv 27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1556-4
Foley MM, Mease LA, Martone RG et al. (2017) The challenges and opportunities in cumulative effects assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev 62:122–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.06.008
Gannon P (2021) The time is now to improve the treatment of biodiversity in canadian environmental impact statements. Environ Impact Assess Rev 86:106504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106504
Gastauer M, Silva JR, Caldeira Junior CF et al. (2018) Mine land rehabilitation: modern ecological approaches for more sustainable mining. J Clean Prod 172:1409–1422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.223
Geist HJ, Lambin EF (2002) Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. Bioscience 52(2):143. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0143:pcaudf]2.0.co;
Gibbs HK, Rausch L, Munger J et al. (2015) Brazil’s Soy Moratorium. Science (80-) 347:377–378. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa0181
Hota P, Behera B (2016) Opencast coal mining and sustainable local livelihoods in Odisha, India. Miner Econ 29:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563-016-0082-7
ICMBIO (2009) Plano de manejo Parque Nacional Montanhas do Tumucumaque. Macapá.
IFC—International Finance Corporation (2013) Good practice handbook: cumulative impact assessment and management, guidance for the private sector in emerging markets. Available at: https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/topics_ext_content/ifc_external_corporate_site/sustainability-atifc/publications/publications_handbook_cumulativeimpactassessment
Jones FC (2016) Cumulative effects assessment: theoretical underpinnings and big problems. Environ Rev 24:187–204. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2015-0073
Kobayashi H, Watando H, Kakimoto M (2014) A global extent site-level analysis of land cover and protected area overlap with mining activities as an indicator of biodiversity pressure. J Clean Prod 84:459–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.049
Laurance WF, Goosem M, Laurance SGW (2009) Impacts of roads and linear clearings on tropical forests. Trends Ecol Evol 24:659–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.06.009
Lechner AM, Owen J, Ang MLE et al. (2019) Historical socio-environmental assessment of resource development footprints using remote sensing. Remote Sens Appl Soc Environ 15:100236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2019.100236
Mangueira JRSA, Vieira LTA, Azevedo TN et al. (2021) Plant diversity conservation in highly deforested landscapes of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Perspect Ecol Conserv. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2020.12.003
Mataveli GAV, Chaves MED, Brunsell NA, Aragão LEOC (2021) The emergence of a new deforestation hotspot in Amazonia. Perspect Ecol Conserv 2–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2021.01.002
Montes CR, Melfi AJ, Carvalho A et al. (2002) Genesis, mineralogy and geochemistry of kaolin deposits of the Jari river, amapá state, Brazil. Clays Clay Miner 50:494–503. https://doi.org/10.1346/000986002320514217
Murguía DI, Bringezu S, Schaldach R (2016) Global direct pressures on biodiversity by large-scale metal mining: spatial distribution and implications for conservation. J Environ Manage 180:409–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.05.040
Nascimento WR, Souza-Filho PWM, Proisy C et al. (2013) Mapping changes in the largest continuous Amazonian mangrove belt using object-based classification of multisensor satellite imagery. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 117:83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2012.10.005
Neri A, Dupin P, Sánchez LE (2016) A pressure-state-response approach to cumulative impact assessment. J Clean Prod 126:288–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.134
Noble B (2008) Strategic approaches to regional cumulative effects assessmet: a case study of the Great Sand Hills, Canada. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 26:78–90. https://doi.org/10.3152/146155108X316405
Noble B, Liu J, Hackett P (2017) The contribution of project environmental assessment to assessing and managing cumulative effects: Individually and collectively insignificant? Environ Manage 59:531–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-016-0799-7
Nobre CA, Sampaio G, Borma LS et al. (2016) Land-use and climate change risks in the Amazon and the need of a novel sustainable development paradigm. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113:10759–10768. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1605516113
Nunes S, Gardner T, Barlow J et al. (2016) Compensating for past deforestation: Assessing the legal forest surplus and deficit of the state of Pará, eastern Amazonia. Land use policy 57:749–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.04.022
Oliveira MJ de O (2010) Diagnóstico do setor mineral do Estado do Amapá. Macapá. http://www.iepa.ap.gov.br/arquivopdf/diagnostico_mineral_amapa.pdf
Olofsson P, Foody GM, Stehman SV, Woodcock CE (2013) Making better use of accuracy data in land change studies: estimating accuracy and area and quantifying uncertainty using stratified estimation. Remote Sens Environ 129:122–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.10.031
PCI Geomatics (2015) PCI Geomatica. https://support.pcigeomatics.com/hc/en-us/categories/200332349-Developer-Resources
Raiter KG, Possingham HP, Prober SM, Hobbs RJ (2014) Under the radar: Mitigating enigmatic ecological impacts. Trends Ecol Evol 29:635–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2014.09.003
Ricketts (2001) The matrix matters: Effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. Am Nat 158:87. https://doi.org/10.2307/3078900
Ritter CD, McCrate G, Nilsson RH et al. (2017) Environmental impact assessment in Brazilian Amazonia: challenges and prospects to assess biodiversity. Biol Conserv 206:161–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.12.031
Sánchez LE, Silva-Sánchez SS, Neri AC (2014) Guide for mine closure planning. Brasília: IBRAM – Brazilian Mining Association. Available at: https://ibram.org.br/wpcontent/uploads/2021/02/00004091.pdf
Santos DC, Souza-Filho PWM, da Rocha Nascimento W et al. (2020) Land cover change, landscape degradation, and restoration along a railway line in the Amazon biome, Brazil. L Degrad Dev 31:2033–2046. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3514
Schultz CA (2012) The U.S. Forest Service’s analysis of cumulative effects to wildlife: A study of legal standards, current practice, and ongoing challenges on a National Forest. Environ Impact Assess Rev 32:74–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2011.03.003
Secretaria de Estado de Meio Ambiente (2011) Plano de Manejo da Reserva Biológica Maicuru. Belém
Secretaria de Estado de Meio Ambiente (2010) Plano de manejo da floresta estadual do Paru. Belém. https://imazon.org.br/cartilha-do-plano-de-manejo-da-flota-do-paru/)
Seitz NE, Westbrook CJ, Noble BF (2011) Bringing science into river systems cumulative effects assessment practice. Environ Impact Assess Rev 31:172–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2010.08.001
Singh GG, Lerner J, Mach M et al. (2020) Scientific shortcomings in environmental impact statements internationally. People Nat 2:369–379. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10081
Siqueira-Gay J, Sánchez LE (2020) Keep the Amazon niobium in the ground. Environ Sci Policy 111:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.05.012
Siqueira-Gay J, Sánchez LE (2021) The outbreak of illegal gold mining in the Brazilian Amazon boosts deforestation. Reg Environ Chang 21:28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-021-01761-7
Siqueira-Gay J, Sonter LJ, Sánchez LE (2020) Exploring potential impacts of mining on forest loss and fragmentation within a biodiverse region of Brazil’s northeastern Amazon. Resour Policy 67:101662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101662
Slootweg R, Rajvanshi A, Mathur VB, Kolhoff A (2010) Biodiversity in Environmental Assessment. Cambridge University Press, New York
Soares-Filho BS, Nepstad DC, Curran LM et al. (2006) Modelling conservation in the Amazon basin. Nature 440:3–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04389
Sonter LJ, Ali SH, Watson JEM (2018) Mining and biodiversity: key issues and research needs in conservation science. Proc R Soc B 285:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.1926
Sonter LJ, Barrett DJ, Moran CJ, Soares-Filho BS (2013) A land system science meta-analysis suggests we underestimate intensive land uses in land use change dynamics. J Land Use Sci 10:191–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2013.871356
Sonter LJ, Herrera D, Barrett DJ et al. (2017) Mining drives extensive deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Nat Commun 8:1013. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00557-w
Sonter LJ, Moran CJ, Barrett DJ, Soares-filho BS (2014) Processes of land use change in mining regions. J Clean Prod 84:494–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.084
Souza-Filho PWM, de Souza EB, Silva Júnior RO et al. (2016) Four decades of land-cover, land-use and hydroclimatology changes in the Itacaiúnas River watershed, southeastern Amazon. J Environ Manage 167:175–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.11.039
Souza-Filho PWM, Giannini TC, Jaffé R, et al. (2019) Mapping and quantification of ferruginous outcrop savannas in the Brazilian Amazon: a challenge for biodiversity conservation. PLoS One 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211095
Souza-Filho PWM, Nascimento Jr. W, Santos D et al. (2018) A GEOBIA Approach for Multitemporal Land-Cover and Land-Use Change Analysis in a Tropical Watershed in the Southeastern Amazon. Remote Sens 10:1683. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10111683
Stehfest E, van Zeist W-J, Valin H et al. (2019) Key determinants of global land-use projections. Nat Commun 10:2166. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09945-w
Treweek J (1999) Ecological Impact Assessment. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford
Trimble (2015) Ecognition 9. https://geospatial.trimble.com/products-and-solutions/ecognition
Venter O, Sanderson EW, Magrach A et al. (2016) Sixteen years of change in the global terrestrial human footprint and implications for biodiversity conservation. Nat Commun 7:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12558
Versluijs M, Hekkala AM, Lindberg E et al. (2020) Comparing the effects of even-aged thinning and selective felling on boreal forest birds. For Ecol Manage 475:118404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118404
Watari T, Nansai K, Nakajima K (2021) Major metals demand, supply, and environmental impacts to 2100: a critical review. Resour Conserv Recycl 164:105107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105107
World Bank (2019) Making mining “Forest-Smart”- Executive Summary, Available at: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/369711560319906622/pdf/Making-Mining-Forest-Smart-Executive-Summary-Report.pdfInvestigating
Xiao W, Fu Y, Wang T, Lv X (2018) Effects of land use transitions due to underground coal mining on ecosystem services in high groundwater table areas: a case study in the Yanzhou coalfield. Land use policy 71:213–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.059
Zhang J, Xu Q, Rao Y, Fu M (2017) Government, enterprise and resident: roles of local agents in regulating and simulating built-up land use and change in a mining city. Land use policy 67:222–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.05.035
Acknowledgements
This research is supported by the São Paulo Research Foundation (grant 2018/12475-7). This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Siqueira-Gay, J., Santos, D., Nascimento, W.R. et al. Investigating Changes Driving Cumulative Impacts on Native Vegetation in Mining Regions in the Northeastern Brazilian Amazon. Environmental Management 69, 438–448 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01578-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01578-4