Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Factors Influencing the Intensity of Adoption of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil Practices by Smallholder Farmers in Thailand

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) was formed in 2004 in response to adverse environmental impacts caused by the expansion of oil palm production. It created voluntary standards to accelerate adoption of improved practices along the supply chain to ensure environmental benefits. However, the rate of adoption among smallholders of the practices RSPO recommends remains low. This study assessed the factors influencing smallholder farmers’ adoption decisions and the intensity of adoption using primary data obtained from 723 randomly selected oil palm producers in the southern region of Thailand, of which 333 RSPO were adopters and 390 were non-adopters. The results of the binary logit and two-limit Tobit regressions revealed that total farm labor, farm size, number of training sessions attended, access to information, extension services, support services, and perceived ease of adoption of the practices had positive effects on the intensity of adoption. However, the age of oil palm trees negatively influenced the intensity of adoption. The results suggest that strengthening capacity building activities and extension services would increase the adoption of the RSPO practices among small-scale farmers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The proportionate simple random sampling was based on the population of oil palm farmers in the cooperatives.

  2. The total sample size was determined based on Yamane’s (1967) approach of sample size determination at the 5% margin of error.

References

  • Aguilar-Gallegos N, Muñoz-Rodríguez M, Santoyo-Cortés H, Aguilar-Ávila J, Klerkx L (2015) Information networks that generate economic value: a study on clusters of adopters of new or improved technologies and practices among oil palm growers in Mexico. Agric Syst 135:122–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Alwarritzi W, Nanseki T, Chomei Y (2015) Analysis of the factors influencing the technical efficiency among oil palm smallholder farmers in Indonesia. Procedia. Environ Sci 28:630–638

    Google Scholar 

  • Anaglo JN, Boateng SD, Swanzy FKM (2014) The influence of adoption of improved oil palm production practices on the livelihood assets of oil palm farmers in Kwaebibirem District of Ghana. J Biol Agric Healthc 4:88–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Azhar B, Saadun N, Prideaux M, Lindenmayer DB (2017) The global palm oil sector must change to save biodiversity and improve food security in the tropics. J Environ Manag 203:457–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Bicalho T, Bessou C, Pacca SA (2016) Land use change within EU sustainability criteria for biofuels: the case of oil palm expansion in the Brazilian Amazon. Renew Energy 89:588–597

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandi C, Cabani T, Hosang C, Schirmbeck S, Westermann L, Wiese H (2015) Sustainability standards for palm oil: challenges for smallholder certification under the RSPO. J Environ Dev 24:292–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Cafer AM, Rikoon JS (2018) Adoption of new technologies by smallholder farmers: the contributions of extension, research institutes, cooperatives, and access to cash for improving tef production in Ethiopia. Agric Hum Values 35:685–699

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson KM, Heilmayr R, Gibbs HK, Noojipady P, Burns DN, Morton DC, Walker NF, Paoli GD, Kremen C (2018) Effect of oil palm sustainability certification on deforestation and fire in Indonesia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115:121–126

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chalak A, Irani A, Chaaban J, Bashour I, Seyfert K, Smoot K, Abebe GK (2017) Farmers’ willingness to adopt conservation agriculture: new evidence from Lebanon. Environ Manag 60:693–704

    Google Scholar 

  • CPD (2005) Land settlement cooperatives. Cooperative Promotion Department, Bangkok. http://www.cpd.go.th/cpden/images/LandsettlementCooperative.pdf. Accessed 10 Feb 2020

  • CPD (2016) Increasing the productivity and marketing of oil palm project. Cooperative Promotion Department, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperative, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallinger J (2011) Oil palm development in Thailand: economic, social and environmental considerations. In: Colchester M, Chao S (eds) Oil palm expansion in South East Asia: trends and implications for local communities and indigenous peoples. Forest Peoples Programme, Moreton-in-Marsh, UK; SawitWatch, Bogor, pp 24–51

  • Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency (2012) The renewable and alternative energy development plan for 25 percent in 10 years (2012–2021). Ministry of Energy, Bangkok

  • DIT (2017) 20 years National Reform Plan for Palm Oil. Department of Internal Trade, Ministry of Commerce, Bangkok. http://www.mukdahan.go.th/muk_download/pdf/433.pdf. Accessed 10 Feb 2020

  • Djokoto JG, Afari-Sefa V (2017) Alternative functional forms for technology choice: application to cocoa production technologies. Technol Soc 50:110–120

    Google Scholar 

  • DOA (2011) Improving the efficiency of oil palm production with good agricultural practices. Department of Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernah, Parvathi P, Waibel H (2016) Adoption of sustainable palm oil practices by Indonesian smallholder farmers J Southeast Asian Econ 33:291–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Euler M, Hoffmann MP, Fathoni Z, Schwarze S (2016) Exploring yield gaps in smallholder oil palm production systems in eastern Sumatra, Indonesia. Agric Syst 146:111–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao Y, Zhang X, Lu J, Wu L, Yin S (2017) Adoption behavior of green control techniques by family farms in China: evidence from 676 family farms in Huang-huai-hai Plain. Crop Prot 99:76–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene WH (2003) Econometric analysis, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~wgreene/Text/econometricanalysis.htm. Accessed 13 Feb 2020

  • Hidayat NK, Glasbergen P, Offermans A (2015) Sustainability certification and palm oil smallholders’ livelihood: A comparison between scheme smallholders and independent smallholders in Indonesia. Int Food Agribus Manage Rev 18:25–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidayat NK, Offermans A, Glasbergen P (2018) Sustainable palm oil as a public responsibility? On the governance capacity of Indonesian Standard for Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO). Agric Hum Values 35:223–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Hospes O, Kroeze C, Oosterveer P, Schouten G, Slingerland M (2017) New generation of knowledge: towards an inter- and transdisciplinary framework for sustainable pathways of palm oil production. NJAS Wagening J Life Sci 80:75–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutabarat S, Slingerland M, Rietberg P, Dries L (2018) Costs and benefits of certification of independent oil palm smallholders in Indonesia. Int Food Agribus Man Rev 21:681–700

    Google Scholar 

  • Jitmun T, Kuwornu JKM, Datta A, Anal AK (2019) Farmers’ perceptions of milk-collecting centres in Thailand’s dairy industry. Dev Pract 29:424–436

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabir MH, Rainis R (2015) Adoption and intensity of integrated pest management (IPM) vegetable farming in Bangladesh: an approach to sustainable agricultural development. Environ Dev Sustain 17:1413–1429

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassie M, Jalet M, Shiferaw B, Mmbando F, Mekuria M (2013) Adoption of interrelated sustainable agricultural practices in smallholder systems: evidence from rural Tanzania. Technol Forecast Soc Change 80:525–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassie M, Teklewold H, Jaleta M, Marenya P, Erenstein O (2015) Understanding the adoption of a portfolio of sustainable intensification practices in eastern and southern Africa. Land Use Policy 42:400–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Khatun R, Reza MIH, Moniruzzaman M, Yaakob Z (2017) Sustainable oil palm industry: the possibilities. Renew Sust Energy Rev 76:608–619

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JSH, Ghazoul J, Obidzinski K, Koh LP (2014) Oil palm smallholder yields and incomes constrained by harvesting practices and type of smallholder management in Indonesia. Agron Sustain Dev 34:501–513

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesage C, Feintrenie L (2018) Are sustainable pathways possible for oil palm development in Latin America? In: 2018 World Bank conference on land and poverty. The World Bank, Washington, DC, pp 19–23

  • Ma W, Abdulai A (2019) IPM adoption, cooperative membership and farm economic performance: Insight from apple farmers in China. China Agric Econ Rev 11:218–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Malike FA, Amiruddin MD, Yaakub Z, Marjuni M, Abdullah N, Bakar NAA, Mustaffa S, Mohamad MM, Hassan MY, Abdullah MO, Kadir APG (2019) Oil palm (Elaeis spp.) breeding in Malaysia. In: Al-Khayri J, Jain S, Johnson D (eds) Advances in plant breeding strategies: industrial and food crops. Springer, Cham, pp 489–535

  • Marin-Burgos V, Clancy JS, Lovett JC (2015) Contesting legitimacy of voluntary sustainability certification schemes: valuation languages and power asymmetries in the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil in Colombia. Ecol Econ 117:303–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Martey E, Al-Hassan RM, Kuwornu JKM (2012) Commercialization of smallholder agriculture in Ghana: a Tobit regression analysis. Afr J Agric Res 7:2131–2141

    Google Scholar 

  • Martey E, Wiredu AN, Etwire PM, Fosu M, Buah SSJ, Bidzakin J, Ahiabor BDK, Kusi F (2014) Fertilizer adoption and use intensity among smallholder farmers in Northern Ghana: a case study of the AGRA Soil Health Project. Sustain Agric Res 3:24–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Peñaranda R, Gasparatos A, Stromberg P, Suwa A, Pandyaswargo AH, Puppim de Oliveira JA (2015) Sustainable production and consumption of palm oil in Indonesia: what can stakeholder perceptions offer to the debate? Sustain Prod Consum 4:16–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgans CL, Meijaard E, Santika T, Law E, Budiharta S, Ancrenaz M, Wilson KA (2018) Evaluating the effectiveness of palm oil certification in delivering multiple sustainability objectives. Environ Res Lett 13:064032

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagiah C, Azmi R (2012) A review of smallholder oil palm production: challenges and opportunities for enhancing sustainability—a Malaysian perspective. J Oil Palm Environ 3:114–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngwira A, Johnsen FH, Aune JB, Mekuria M, Thierfelder C (2014) Adoption and extent of conservation agriculture practices among smallholder farmers in Malawi. J Soil Water Conserv 69:107–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Ni LX, Ali F, Zainudin ZH (2016) Factors influencing the implementation of Malaysia Sustainable Palm Oil (MSPO) among oil palm smallholders in Malaysia. Int J Acad Res Bus Soc Sci 6:272–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Novara A, Minacapilli M, Santoro A, Rodrigo-Comino J, Carrubba A, Sarno M, Venezia G, Gristina L (2019) Real cover crops contribution to soil organic carbon sequestration in sloping vineyard. Sci Total Environ 652:300–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Ntshangase NL, Muroyiwa B, Sibanda M (2018) Farmers’ perceptions and factors influencing the adoption of no-till conservation agriculture by small-scale farmers in Zashuke, KwaZulu-Natal province. Sustainability 10:555

    Google Scholar 

  • OAE (2017a) Agricultural statistics of Thailand 2017. Office of Agricultural Economic, Bangkok. http://www.oae.go.th/assets/portals/1/files/yearbook60.pdf. Accessed 10 Feb 2020

  • OAE (2017b) The Twenty-Year Agriculture and Cooperative Strategy (2017–2036) and the Five-Year Agriculture Development Plan Under the Twelfth National Economic and Social Development Plan (2017–2021). Office of Agricultural Economics, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • Okereke C, Stacewicz I (2018) Stakeholder perceptions of the environmental effectiveness of multi-stakeholder initiatives: Evidence from the palm oil, soy, cotton, and timber programs. Soc Nat Resour 31:1302–1318

    Google Scholar 

  • Oosterveer P (2015) Promoting sustainable palm oil: viewed from a global networks and flows perspective. J Clean Prod 107:146–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Ordway EM, Naylor RL, Nkongho RN, Lambin EF (2017) Oil palm expansion in Cameroon: insights into sustainability opportunities and challenges in Africa. Glob Environ Change 47:190–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Paltasingh KR (2018) Land tenure security and adoption of modern rice technology in Odisha, Eastern India: revisiting Besley’s hypothesis. Land Use Policy 78:236–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedzisa T, Rugube L, Winter-Nelson A, Baylis K, Mazvimavi K (2015) The intensity of adoption of conservation agriculture by smallholder farmers in Zimbabwe. Agrekon 54:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck RS, Rubinfeld DL (1998) Econometric models and economic forecasts. Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirker J, Mosnier A, Kraxner F, Havlík P, Obersteiner M (2016) What are the limits to oil palm expansion? Glob Environ Change 40:73–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Promme P, Kuwornu JKM, Jourdain D, Shivakoti GP, Soni P (2017) Factors influencing rubber marketing by smallholder farmers in Thailand. Dev Pract 27:865–879

    Google Scholar 

  • Purnomo H, Okarda B, Dewayani AA, Ali M, Achdiawan R, Kartodihardjo H, Pacheco P, Juniwaty KS (2018) Reducing forest and land fires through good palm oil value chain governance. Policy Econ 91:94–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Rietberg P, Slingerland M (2016) Barriers to smallholder RSPO certification. A science for policy paper by the SEnSOR programme. Wageningen University, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • RSPO (2017) RSPO Impact Update 2017. RSPO. https://rspo.org/toc/RSPO-Impact-Update-Report-2017_221117.pdf. Accessed 10 Feb 2020

  • RSPO (2018) RSPO management system requirements and guidance for group certification of FFB production, RSPO. https://rspo.org/publications/download/45a7657b0a48f42. Accessed 10 Feb 2020

  • Ruysschaert D, Salles D (2014) Towards global voluntary standards: questioning the effectiveness in attaining conservation goals. The case of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO). Ecol Econ 107:438–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Saadun N, Lim EAL, Esa SM, Ngu F, Awang F, Gimin A, Azhar B (2018) Socio-ecological perspectives of engaging smallholders in environmental-friendly palm oil certification schemes. Land Use Policy 72:333–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Saswattecha K, Kroeze C, Jawjit W, Hein L (2015) Assessing the environmental impact of palm oil produced in Thailand. J Clean Prod 100:150–169

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saswattecha K, Kroeze C, Jawjit W, Hein L (2016) Options to reduce environmental impacts of palm oil production in Thailand. J Clean Prod 137:370–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Saswattecha K, Kroeze C, Jawjit W, Hein L (2017) Improving environmental sustainability of Thai palm oil production in 2050. J Clean Prod 147:572–588

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleifer P, Sun Y (2018) Emerging markets and private governance: the political economy of sustainable palm oil in China and India. Rev Int Pol Econ 25:190–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Tao HH, Slade EM, Willis KJ, Caliman JP, Snaddon JL (2016) Effects of soil management practices on soil fauna feeding activity in an Indonesian oil palm plantation. Agric Ecosyst Environ 218:133–140

    Google Scholar 

  • TAS (2008) Thai Agricultural Standard (TAS 5904–2010): Good Agricultural Practices for Oil Palm. National Bureau of Agricultural Commodity and Food Standard, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • Teoh CH (2010) Key sustainability issues in the palm oil sector. A discussion paper for multi-stakeholder consultations. The World Bank and IFC, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Thongrak S, Kiatpathomchai S (2012) The impacts study of the project on sustainable palm oil production for bio-energy in Thailand. Final Report, GIZ, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulloch VJD, Brown CJ, Possingham HP, Jupiter SD, Maina JM, Klein C (2016) Improving conservation outcomes for coral reefs affected by future oil palm development in Papua New Guinea. Biol Conserv 203:43–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich-Schad JD, de Jalón SG, Babin N, Pape A, Prokopy LS (2017) Measuring and understanding agricultural producers’ adoption of nutrient best management practices. J Soil Water Conserv 72:506–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogelgesang F, Kumar U, Sundram K (2018) Building a sustainable future together: Malaysian palm oil and European consumption. J Oil Palm Environ Health 9:1–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Geibler J (2013) Market-based governance for sustainability in value chains: conditions for successful standard setting in the palm oil sector. J Clean Prod 56:39–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge JM (2006) Introductory econometrics: a modern approach. 3rd edn, Thomson/South-Western, Mason

  • Yamane T (1967) Statistics, an Introductory Analysis. 2nd edn, Harper and Row, New York, USA

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, Thailand and the Asian Institute of Technology, Thailand for granting the scholarship to the first author for funding the data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Food, Agriculture and Bioresources, School of Environment, Resources and Development, Asian Institute of Technology, Klong Luang, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand

    Wipadsara Rodthong, John K. M. Kuwornu, Avishek Datta & Anil Kumar Anal

  2. Department of Agricultural Economics, Agribusosterveeiness and Extension, University of Energy and Natural Resources, Sunyani, Ghana

    John K. M. Kuwornu

  3. Department of Development and Sustainability, School of Environment, Resources and Development, Asian Institute of Technology, Klong Luang, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand

    Takuji W. Tsusaka

Authors
  1. Wipadsara Rodthong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John K. M. Kuwornu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Avishek Datta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Anil Kumar Anal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Takuji W. Tsusaka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Avishek Datta.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 6

Table 6 Rate of oil palm farmers’ adoption of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) practices in the southern region of Thailand
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rodthong, W., Kuwornu, J.K.M., Datta, A. et al. Factors Influencing the Intensity of Adoption of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil Practices by Smallholder Farmers in Thailand. Environmental Management 66, 377–394 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01323-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01323-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation