Abstract
The UNESCO Man and the Biosphere program has operated for 45 years as an international program that started in the 1970s to conserve biotic communities and provide areas for research, education, and training. The program later evolved in the 1990s to address social and environmental issues in a sustainable manner across a landscape. This program was one of the first efforts that recognized the importance of working beyond park and protected area boundaries and the need to sustain livelihoods as much as the resources. In the MAB program's infancy, the United States (U.S.) was a major advocate and leader with more than 45 biosphere reserves, most of them established in or around 1976. Yet, many political, economic, and other external factors influenced the U.S. MAB involvement in subsequent years. Consequently, the U.S. has remained largely inactive in the international MAB network for the past fifteen years until a recent push to revive the program under the leadership of the State Department and the National Park Service. Through in-depth research on two longterm U.S. biosphere reserves, this paper provides a description of the key events impacting the U.S. MAB program over the past several decades and discusses the influential role of politics, a public image, and the perceptions of international designations. Through the lessons presented in this paper, recommendations are provided to support the revival of the MAB program in the U.S.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allison HE, Hobbs RJ (2004) Resilience, adaptive capacity, and the ‘lock-in trap’ of the Western Australian Agricultural Region. Ecol Soc 9:3
Batisse M (1982) The biosphere reserve: a tool for environmental conservation and management. Environ Conserv 9:101–111
Baum J, Singh J (1994) Organizational niches and the dynamics of organizational mortality. J Sociol 100:346–380
Beier CM, Lovecraft AL, Chapin FS (2009) Growth and collapse of a resource system: an adaptive cycle of change in public lands governance and forest management in Alaska. Ecol Soc 14:5
Billings L (2016) Under Trump, NASA may turn a blind eye to climate change. Sci. Am. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/under-trump-nasa-may-turn-a-blind-eye-to-climate-change/. Accessed 21 Nov 2017
Brundtland Commission (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Buckley R (2004) The effects of world heritage listing on tourism to Australian national parks. J Sustain Tour 12:70–84
Cameron KS, Whetten DA (1981) Organizational effectiveness over organizational life cycles. Admin Sci Quart 26:525–544
Chaffin BC, Garmestani AS, Gosnell H, Craig RK (2016) Institutional networks and adaptive water governance in the Klamath River Basin, USA. Environ Sci Pol 57:112–121
Chaffin BC, Craig RK, Gosnell H (2014) Resilience, adaptation, and transformation in the Klamath River Basin socio-ecological system. Idaho. Law Rev 51:157–193
Chaffin BC, Gunderson LH (2016) Emergence, institutionalization and renewal: rhythms of adaptive governance in complex social-ecological systems. J Environ Manag 165:81–87
Chaffin BC, Gosnell H, Cosens BA (2016) A decade of adaptive governance scholarship: synthesis and future directions. Ecol Soc 19:56
Coetzer KL, Witkowski ETF, Erasmus BFN (2014) Reviewing biosphere reserves globally: effective conservation action or bureaucraticl label? Biol Rev 89:82–104
Coffman MS (1997) Globalized grizzlies. N Am. http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/1350071-environmentalp00823.html. Accessed 4 Dec 2017
Daedlow K, Beckmann V, Arlinghaus R (2011) Assessing an adaptive cycle in a social system under external pressure to change: the Importance of intergroup relations in recreational fisheries governance. Ecol Soc 16:3
Dodge HR, Fullerton S, Robbins JE (1994) Stage of the organizational life cycle and competition as mediators of problem perception for small businesses. Strateg Manag J 15:121–134
Eisenhardt M (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad Manag Rev 14:532–550
Folke C (2006) Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Glob Environ Chang 16:253–267
Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30:441–473
Fountain H, Goode E (2016) Trump has options for undoing Obama’s climate legacy. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/25/science/donald-trump-obama-climate.html?_r=0. Accessed 4 Dec 2017
Franklin JF (1977) The biosphere reserve program in the United States. Science 195:262–267
Gilbert VT (2016) Biosphere reserves and sovereignty: a story for the United States Man and Biosphere (MAB) community. http://npshistory.com/publications/mab/biosphere-reserves-and-sovereignty.pdf. Accessed 4 Dec 2017
Gioia DA, Hamilton AL, Patvardhan SD (2014) Image is everything: reflections on the dominance of image in modern organizational life. Res Organ Behav 34:129–154
Glick WH, Huber GP, Miller CC, Doty DH, Sutcliffe KM (1990) Studying changes in organizational design and effectiveness: retrospective event histories and periodic assessments. Org Sci 3:293–312
Grundmann P, Ehlers MH, Uckert G (2012) Responses of agricultural bioenergy sectors in Brandenburg (Germany) to climate, economic and legal changes: An application of Holling’s adaptive cycle. Energy Policy 48:118–129
Gunderson LH, Holling C (eds) (2001) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington
Gunderson L, Holling C, Light S (eds) (1995) Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. Columbia University Press, New York
Hannan MT, Carroll GR, Pólos L (2003) The organizational niche. Sociol Theory 21:309–340
Holling C (1986) The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems; local surprise and global change. In: Clark W, Munn R (eds) Sustainable development of the biosphere. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 282–317
Holling C (2001) Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems 4:390–405
Holling C (1995) What barriers? What bridges? In: Gunderson L, Holling C, Light S (eds) Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 3–36
Iriberri A, Leroy G (2009) A life-cycle perspective on online community success. ACM Comput Surv 41:1–29
Ishwaran N, Persic A, Tri NH (2008) Concept and practice: the case of UNESCO biosphere reserves. Int J Environ Sustain Dev 7:118–131
Jawahar IM, McLaughlin GL (2001) Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory: an organizational life cycle approach. Acad Manag Rev 26:397–414
Jones PJS, Qiu W, De Santo EM (2013) Governing marine protected areas: Social-ecological resilience through institutional diversity. Mar Policy 41:5–13
Keeble BR (1988) The Brundtland report: our common future. Med War 4:17–25
Kimberly JR, Miles RH (1980) The organizational life cycle: Issues in the creation, transformation, and decline of organizations. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco
Lee TL (1999) Using qualitative methods in organizational research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
Lester DL, Pamell JA, Carraher S (2003) Organizational life cycle: a five-stage empirical scale. Int J Organ Anal 11:339–354
Levine CH (1978) Organizational decline and cutback management Public Adm Rev 38:316–325
Margerum RD (2011) Beyond consensus: Improving collaborative planning and management. MIT Press, Cambridge
Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
Miller D, Friesen P (1984) A longitudinal study of the corporate life cycle. Manag Sci 30:1161–1183
Miller TR, Muñoz-Erickson T, Redman CL (2011) Transforming knowledge for sustainability: towards adaptive academic institutions. Int J Sustain High Educ 12:177–192
Moller L, Kammann E (2007) MAB—man and the Biosphere in retorspect. UNESCO Today 2:13–15
Moores K, Yuen S (2001) Management accounting systems and organizational configuration: a life-cycle perspective. Account Org Soc 26:351–389
Nisbet M (2009) Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environ Mag 51(2):14–23. http://www.climateaccess.org/sites/default/files/Nisbet_CommunicatingClimate Change_0.pdf. Accessed 4 Dec 2017
Olsson L, Jerneck A, Thoren H, Persson J, O’Byrne D (2015) Why resilience is unappealing to social science: theoretical and empirical investigations of the scientific use of resilience Sci Adv 1:e1400217–e1400217
Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
Pelling M, Manuel-Navarrete D (2011) From resilience to transformation: The adaptive cycle in two Mexican urban centers. Ecol Soc 16:11
Pinto JK, Prescott JE (1988) Variations in critical success factors over the stages in the project life cycle. J Manag 14:5–18
Price MF (2002) The periodic review of biosphere reserves: a mechanism to foster sites of excellence for conservation and sustainable development. Environ Sci Pol 5:13–18
Quinn RE, Cameron K (1983) Organizational life cycles and shifting criteria of effectiveness: some preliminary evidence. Manag Sci 29:33–51
Redclift M (2005) An oxymoron comes of age. Sustain Devel 13:212–227
Reed MG (2016) Conservation (in)action: renewing the relevance of UNESCO biosphere reserves. Conserv Let 9:448–456
Resilience Alliance (n.d.) Adaptive Cycle. Webpage: https://www.resalliance.org/adaptive-cycle. Accessed 20 Nov 2017
Robinson J (2004) Squaring the circle? some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development. Ecol Econ 48:369–384
Santora JC, Sarros JC (2008) Founders, leaders, and organizational life cycles: the choice is easy – learn or fail! Dev Learn Organ 22:12–15
Schultz L, Duit A, Folke C (2011) Participation, adaptive co-management, and management performance in the world network of biosphere reserves. World Dev 39:662–671
Seidman I (2006) Interviewing as qualitative research, 3rd edn. Teachers College Press, New York
Shafer CL (1998) US National Park buffer zones: historical, scientific, social, and legal aspects. Environ Manag 23:49–73
Shafer CL (2004) A geography of hope: pursuing the voluntary preservation of America’s natural heritage. Land Urb Plan 66:127–171
Sirmon DG, Hitt MA, Ireland RD, Gilbert BA (2010) Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage: breadth, depth, and life cycle effects. J Manag 37:1390–1412
Slay B (2012) Triple wins for sustainable development. UNDP, New York
Smith NR, Miner JB (1983) Type of entrepreneur, type of firm, and managerial motivation: implications for organizational life cycle theory. Strat Manag J 4:325–340
Soane ID, Scolozzi R, Gretter A, Hubacek K (2012) Exploring panarchy in alpine Grasslands: an application of adaptive cycle concepts to the conservation of a cultural landscape. Ecol Soc 17:18
Sohn M-W (2002) A relational approach to measuring competition among hospitals. Health Serv Res 37:457–82
Sokolov V (1981) The biosphere reserve concept in the USSR. Ambio 10:97–101
U.S. MAB Secretariat, U.S. Department of State (1996) The United States Man and the Biosphere Program. Department of State Oublication 10412. http://npshistory.com/publications/mab/index.htm. Accessed 14 Jan 2017
UNESCO (1974) Programme on Man and the Biosphere (MAB) Task force on: criteria and guidelines for the choice and establishment of biosphere reserves. MAP report series No. 22, Paris. http://npshistory.com/publications/mab/unesco-mab-report/22.pdf. Accessed 14 Jan 2017
UNESCO (2016a) International Co-Ordinating Council (ICC) of the Man and the Biosphere (MAB) Programme. UNESCO. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/natural-sciences/environment/ecological-sciences/man-and-biosphere-programme/about-mab/icc/. Accessed 14 Jan 2017
UNESCO (2016b) Main characteristics of biosphere reserves. UNESCO. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/natural-sciences/environment/ecological-sciences/biosphere-reserves/main-characteristics/. Accessed 14 Jan 2017
UNESCO (2016c) Man and the Biosphere Programme. UNESCO. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/natural-sciences/environment/ecological-sciences/man-and-biosphere-programme/. Accessed 14 Jan 2017
Walker J, Cooper M (2011) Genealogies of resilience from systems ecology to the political economy of crisis adaptation. Secur Dial 42:143–160
Walker B, Holling CS, Carpenter SR, Kinzig A (2004) Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 9:5
Whetten DA (1980) Decline: A neglected topic in organizational science Acad Manag Rev 5:577–588
Yang C-H, Lin H-L, Han C-C (2010) Analysis of international tourist arrivals in China: the role of World Heritage Sites. Tour Manag 31:827–837
Yin RK (2009) Case study research: Design and methods, 4th edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
Zavyalova A, Pfarrer MD, Reger RK, Hubbard TD (2016) Reputation as a benefit and a burden? How stakeholders’ organizational identification affects the role of reputation following a negative event. Acad Manag J 59:253–276
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thomsen, J.M. An Investigation of the Critical Events and Influential Factors to the Evolution of the U.S. Man and the Biosphere Program. Environmental Management 61, 545–562 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0988-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0988-z