Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An Investigation of the Critical Events and Influential Factors to the Evolution of the U.S. Man and the Biosphere Program

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The UNESCO Man and the Biosphere program has operated for 45 years as an international program that started in the 1970s to conserve biotic communities and provide areas for research, education, and training. The program later evolved in the 1990s to address social and environmental issues in a sustainable manner across a landscape. This program was one of the first efforts that recognized the importance of working beyond park and protected area boundaries and the need to sustain livelihoods as much as the resources. In the MAB program's infancy, the United States (U.S.) was a major advocate and leader with more than 45 biosphere reserves, most of them established in or around 1976. Yet, many political, economic, and other external factors influenced the U.S. MAB involvement in subsequent years. Consequently, the U.S. has remained largely inactive in the international MAB network for the past fifteen years until a recent push to revive the program under the leadership of the State Department and the National Park Service. Through in-depth research on two longterm U.S. biosphere reserves, this paper provides a description of the key events impacting the U.S. MAB program over the past several decades and discusses the influential role of politics, a public image, and the perceptions of international designations. Through the lessons presented in this paper, recommendations are provided to support the revival of the MAB program in the U.S.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison HE, Hobbs RJ (2004) Resilience, adaptive capacity, and the ‘lock-in trap’ of the Western Australian Agricultural Region. Ecol Soc 9:3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batisse M (1982) The biosphere reserve: a tool for environmental conservation and management. Environ Conserv 9:101–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum J, Singh J (1994) Organizational niches and the dynamics of organizational mortality. J Sociol 100:346–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Beier CM, Lovecraft AL, Chapin FS (2009) Growth and collapse of a resource system: an adaptive cycle of change in public lands governance and forest management in Alaska. Ecol Soc 14:5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billings L (2016) Under Trump, NASA may turn a blind eye to climate change. Sci. Am. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/under-trump-nasa-may-turn-a-blind-eye-to-climate-change/. Accessed 21 Nov 2017

  • Brundtland Commission (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley R (2004) The effects of world heritage listing on tourism to Australian national parks. J Sustain Tour 12:70–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron KS, Whetten DA (1981) Organizational effectiveness over organizational life cycles. Admin Sci Quart 26:525–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaffin BC, Garmestani AS, Gosnell H, Craig RK (2016) Institutional networks and adaptive water governance in the Klamath River Basin, USA. Environ Sci Pol 57:112–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaffin BC, Craig RK, Gosnell H (2014) Resilience, adaptation, and transformation in the Klamath River Basin socio-ecological system. Idaho. Law Rev 51:157–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaffin BC, Gunderson LH (2016) Emergence, institutionalization and renewal: rhythms of adaptive governance in complex social-ecological systems. J Environ Manag 165:81–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaffin BC, Gosnell H, Cosens BA (2016) A decade of adaptive governance scholarship: synthesis and future directions. Ecol Soc 19:56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coetzer KL, Witkowski ETF, Erasmus BFN (2014) Reviewing biosphere reserves globally: effective conservation action or bureaucraticl label? Biol Rev 89:82–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffman MS (1997) Globalized grizzlies. N Am. http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/1350071-environmentalp00823.html. Accessed 4 Dec 2017

  • Daedlow K, Beckmann V, Arlinghaus R (2011) Assessing an adaptive cycle in a social system under external pressure to change: the Importance of intergroup relations in recreational fisheries governance. Ecol Soc 16:3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodge HR, Fullerton S, Robbins JE (1994) Stage of the organizational life cycle and competition as mediators of problem perception for small businesses. Strateg Manag J 15:121–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt M (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad Manag Rev 14:532–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke C (2006) Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Glob Environ Chang 16:253–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30:441–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fountain H, Goode E (2016) Trump has options for undoing Obama’s climate legacy. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/25/science/donald-trump-obama-climate.html?_r=0. Accessed 4 Dec 2017

  • Franklin JF (1977) The biosphere reserve program in the United States. Science 195:262–267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert VT (2016) Biosphere reserves and sovereignty: a story for the United States Man and Biosphere (MAB) community. http://npshistory.com/publications/mab/biosphere-reserves-and-sovereignty.pdf. Accessed 4 Dec 2017

  • Gioia DA, Hamilton AL, Patvardhan SD (2014) Image is everything: reflections on the dominance of image in modern organizational life. Res Organ Behav 34:129–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick WH, Huber GP, Miller CC, Doty DH, Sutcliffe KM (1990) Studying changes in organizational design and effectiveness: retrospective event histories and periodic assessments. Org Sci 3:293–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grundmann P, Ehlers MH, Uckert G (2012) Responses of agricultural bioenergy sectors in Brandenburg (Germany) to climate, economic and legal changes: An application of Holling’s adaptive cycle. Energy Policy 48:118–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson LH, Holling C (eds) (2001) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson L, Holling C, Light S (eds) (1995) Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan MT, Carroll GR, Pólos L (2003) The organizational niche. Sociol Theory 21:309–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling C (1986) The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems; local surprise and global change. In: Clark W, Munn R (eds) Sustainable development of the biosphere. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 282–317

  • Holling C (2001) Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems 4:390–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling C (1995) What barriers? What bridges? In: Gunderson L, Holling C, Light S (eds) Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 3–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Iriberri A, Leroy G (2009) A life-cycle perspective on online community success. ACM Comput Surv 41:1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishwaran N, Persic A, Tri NH (2008) Concept and practice: the case of UNESCO biosphere reserves. Int J Environ Sustain Dev 7:118–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jawahar IM, McLaughlin GL (2001) Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory: an organizational life cycle approach. Acad Manag Rev 26:397–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones PJS, Qiu W, De Santo EM (2013) Governing marine protected areas: Social-ecological resilience through institutional diversity. Mar Policy 41:5–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeble BR (1988) The Brundtland report: our common future. Med War 4:17–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimberly JR, Miles RH (1980) The organizational life cycle: Issues in the creation, transformation, and decline of organizations. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee TL (1999) Using qualitative methods in organizational research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

  • Lester DL, Pamell JA, Carraher S (2003) Organizational life cycle: a five-stage empirical scale. Int J Organ Anal 11:339–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine CH (1978) Organizational decline and cutback management Public Adm Rev 38:316–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margerum RD (2011) Beyond consensus: Improving collaborative planning and management. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

  • Miller D, Friesen P (1984) A longitudinal study of the corporate life cycle. Manag Sci 30:1161–1183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller TR, Muñoz-Erickson T, Redman CL (2011) Transforming knowledge for sustainability: towards adaptive academic institutions. Int J Sustain High Educ 12:177–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moller L, Kammann E (2007) MAB—man and the Biosphere in retorspect. UNESCO Today 2:13–15

  • Moores K, Yuen S (2001) Management accounting systems and organizational configuration: a life-cycle perspective. Account Org Soc 26:351–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet M (2009) Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environ Mag 51(2):14–23. http://www.climateaccess.org/sites/default/files/Nisbet_CommunicatingClimate Change_0.pdf. Accessed 4 Dec 2017

  • Olsson L, Jerneck A, Thoren H, Persson J, O’Byrne D (2015) Why resilience is unappealing to social science: theoretical and empirical investigations of the scientific use of resilience Sci Adv 1:e1400217–e1400217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelling M, Manuel-Navarrete D (2011) From resilience to transformation: The adaptive cycle in two Mexican urban centers. Ecol Soc 16:11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto JK, Prescott JE (1988) Variations in critical success factors over the stages in the project life cycle. J Manag 14:5–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Price MF (2002) The periodic review of biosphere reserves: a mechanism to foster sites of excellence for conservation and sustainable development. Environ Sci Pol 5:13–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn RE, Cameron K (1983) Organizational life cycles and shifting criteria of effectiveness: some preliminary evidence. Manag Sci 29:33–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redclift M (2005) An oxymoron comes of age. Sustain Devel 13:212–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed MG (2016) Conservation (in)action: renewing the relevance of UNESCO biosphere reserves. Conserv Let 9:448–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resilience Alliance (n.d.) Adaptive Cycle. Webpage: https://www.resalliance.org/adaptive-cycle. Accessed 20 Nov 2017

  • Robinson J (2004) Squaring the circle? some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development. Ecol Econ 48:369–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santora JC, Sarros JC (2008) Founders, leaders, and organizational life cycles: the choice is easy – learn or fail! Dev Learn Organ 22:12–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz L, Duit A, Folke C (2011) Participation, adaptive co-management, and management performance in the world network of biosphere reserves. World Dev 39:662–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidman I (2006) Interviewing as qualitative research, 3rd edn. Teachers College Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer CL (1998) US National Park buffer zones: historical, scientific, social, and legal aspects. Environ Manag 23:49–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafer CL (2004) A geography of hope: pursuing the voluntary preservation of America’s natural heritage. Land Urb Plan 66:127–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirmon DG, Hitt MA, Ireland RD, Gilbert BA (2010) Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage: breadth, depth, and life cycle effects. J Manag 37:1390–1412

    Google Scholar 

  • Slay B (2012) Triple wins for sustainable development. UNDP, New York

  • Smith NR, Miner JB (1983) Type of entrepreneur, type of firm, and managerial motivation: implications for organizational life cycle theory. Strat Manag J 4:325–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soane ID, Scolozzi R, Gretter A, Hubacek K (2012) Exploring panarchy in alpine Grasslands: an application of adaptive cycle concepts to the conservation of a cultural landscape. Ecol Soc 17:18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sohn M-W (2002) A relational approach to measuring competition among hospitals. Health Serv Res 37:457–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokolov V (1981) The biosphere reserve concept in the USSR. Ambio 10:97–101

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. MAB Secretariat, U.S. Department of State (1996) The United States Man and the Biosphere Program. Department of State Oublication 10412. http://npshistory.com/publications/mab/index.htm. Accessed 14 Jan 2017

  • UNESCO (1974) Programme on Man and the Biosphere (MAB) Task force on: criteria and guidelines for the choice and establishment of biosphere reserves. MAP report series No. 22, Paris. http://npshistory.com/publications/mab/unesco-mab-report/22.pdf. Accessed 14 Jan 2017

  • UNESCO (2016a) International Co-Ordinating Council (ICC) of the Man and the Biosphere (MAB) Programme. UNESCO. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/natural-sciences/environment/ecological-sciences/man-and-biosphere-programme/about-mab/icc/. Accessed 14 Jan 2017

  • UNESCO (2016b) Main characteristics of biosphere reserves. UNESCO. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/natural-sciences/environment/ecological-sciences/biosphere-reserves/main-characteristics/. Accessed 14 Jan 2017

  • UNESCO (2016c) Man and the Biosphere Programme. UNESCO. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/natural-sciences/environment/ecological-sciences/man-and-biosphere-programme/. Accessed 14 Jan 2017

  • Walker J, Cooper M (2011) Genealogies of resilience from systems ecology to the political economy of crisis adaptation. Secur Dial 42:143–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker B, Holling CS, Carpenter SR, Kinzig A (2004) Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 9:5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whetten DA (1980) Decline: A neglected topic in organizational science Acad Manag Rev 5:577–588

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang C-H, Lin H-L, Han C-C (2010) Analysis of international tourist arrivals in China: the role of World Heritage Sites. Tour Manag 31:827–837

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yin RK (2009) Case study research: Design and methods, 4th edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Zavyalova A, Pfarrer MD, Reger RK, Hubbard TD (2016) Reputation as a benefit and a burden? How stakeholders’ organizational identification affects the role of reputation following a negative event. Acad Manag J 59:253–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer M. Thomsen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thomsen, J.M. An Investigation of the Critical Events and Influential Factors to the Evolution of the U.S. Man and the Biosphere Program. Environmental Management 61, 545–562 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0988-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0988-z

Keywords

Navigation