Abstract
Land resource sustainability for urban development characterizes the problem of decision-making with multiplicity and uncertainty. A decision support system prototype aids in the assessment of incremental land development plan proposals put forth within the long-term community priority of a sustainable growth. Facilitating this assessment is the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), a multicriteria evaluation and decision support system. The decision support system incorporates multiple sustainability criteria, weighted strategically responsive to local public policy priorities and community–specific situations and values, while gauging and directing desirable future courses of development. Furthermore, the decision support system uses a GIS, which facilitates an assessment of urban form with multiple indicators of sustainability as spatial criteria thematically. The resultant land-use sustainability scores indicate, on the ratio-scale of AHP, whether or not a desirable urban form is likely in the long run, and if so, to what degree. The two alternative modes of synthesis in AHP—ideal and distributive—provide assessments of a land development plan incrementally (short-term) and city-wide pattern comprehensively (long-term), respectively. Thus, the spatial decision support system facilitates proactive and collective public policy determination of land resource for future sustainable urban development.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aczel J, T. L. Saaty. 1983. Procedures for synthesizing ratio scale judgments. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 27:93–102
Anselin A., P. M. Meire, L. Anselin. 1989. Multicriteria techniques in ecological evaluation. Biological Conservation 49:215–229
ArcView 3.2. GIS.1998. ESRI, Redlands, California
Banai R. 1993. Fuzziness in geographic information systems: Contributions from the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Geographical Information System 7:315–329
Banai R. 2000. Transit station area land use/site assessment with multiple criteria: An integrated GIS-expert system prototype. Journal of Public Transportation 3:95–110
Beatley T. 1994. Ethical land use: Principles of policy and planning. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland. 320
Beatley T., 1995. Planning and sustainability: The elements of the new (improved?) paradigm. Journal of Planning Literature 9:383–395
Beatley T., K. Manning. 1997. The ecology of place: Planning for environment, economy, and community. Island Press, Washington, DC. 265
Berke P. R., M. M. Conroy. 2000. Are we planning for sustainable development? Journal of the American Planning Association 66:21–33
Breheny M. J. (ed.) 1993. Sustainable development and urban form Pion Limited, London. 292
Calthorpe P. 1993. The next American metropolis: Ecology, community, and the American dream. Princeton Architectural Press, New York. 176
Calthorpe, P.,and Fulton W. 2001. The regional city Island Press, Washington, pp 304
Campbell S., 1996. Green cities, growing cities, just cities?: Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development. Journal of the American Planning Association 62:296–312
Collins M. G., F. R. Steiner, M. J. Rushman. 2001. Land-use suitability analysis in the United States: Historical development and promising technological achievements. Environmental Management 28:611–621
Congress for New Urbanism (CNU). 2004. http://www.cnu.org. Retrieved June 9 2004
Eastman 1997. IDRISI for Windows, Version 2.0: tutorial exercises. Worcester, MA: Graduate School of Geography, Clark University.
Eastman J. R., W. Jin, P. A. K. Kyem, J. Toledano. 1995. Raster procedures for multi-criteria/multi-objective decisions. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 61:539–547
El Nasser, H., and P. Overberg. 2001. What you don’t know about sprawl. Controlling development a big concern, but analysis has unexpected findings. USA Today. McLean, Virginia. February 22, Page 1a
Expert Choice 2000. Advanced decision support software. Pittsburgh, PA. http://www.expertchoice.com
Forman E. H. 1993. Facts and fictions about the analytic hierarchy process. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 17:19–26
Fulton, W., and others. 2002. Growth management ballot measures in California.http://www.lgc.org/freepub/PDF/Land_Use/reports/ca_growth_mgmt_report.pdf
Howard R. A., 2004 Speaking of decisions: precise decision language Decision Analysis 1:71–78
IDRISI Killimanjaro. 2003. http://www.clarklabs.org
Jankowski, P., T. L. Nyerges, A. Smith, T. J. Moore, and E. Horvath. 1997. Spatial group choice. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems11, 6:566–602
Johnson M. P. 2001. Environmental impacts of urban sprawl: A survey of the literature and proposed research agenda. Environment and Planning A 33:717–735
Juergensmeyer J. C., T. E. Roberts. 1998. Land use planning and control law. West Group, St. Paul, Minnesota, 795
Kaiser E. J., D. R. Godschalk, F. S. Chapin. 1995. Urban land use planning. University of Illinois Press, Urbana and Chicago, 493
Katz P. (ed.) 1994. The new urbanism: Toward an architecture of community. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, 288
Krizek K. J., J. Power. 1996. A planners guide to sustainable development. PAS report number 467. APA, Washington, DC, 66
Landis J., M. Zhang. 1998. The second generation of the California urban futures model: Parts I and II. Environment and Planning B 25:795–824
Landis J., M. Zhang. 1998. The second generation of the California urban futures model: Parts I and II. Environment and Planning B 30:657–666
Lynch K. 1984. Good city form. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 524
Malczewski J. 1999. GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 408
Malczewski J., 1996. A GIS-based approach to multiple criteria group decision making. International Journal of Geographic Information Systems 10:955–971
Rittel H. W. J., M. M. Webber. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4:155–159
Saaty, T.L. 1990. Physics as a decision theory. European Journal of Operations Research 48:98–104
Saaty T. L. 1996. Multicriteria decision-making: The analytic hierarchy process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 437
Saaty T. L. 1998. Reflections and projections on creativity in operations research and management science: A pressing need for a shift in paradigm. INFORMS 46:9–16
Saaty T. L., L. G. Vargas. 2001. Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Massachusetts, 352 pp
Schmoldt D. L., J. Kangas, G. Mendoza, M. Pesonen (eds.) 2001.The analytic hierarchy process in natural resource and environmental decision making. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 328
Schock, S. 2000. Projecting land-use change. US EPA (Washington, D.C.) http://www.geog.ucsb.edu/∼kclarke/ucime/Helens Sem/seminar2001/REPORTfinal2.pdf
Siddiqui M. Z., J. W. Everett, B. E. Vieux. 1996. Landfill siting using geographic information systems: A demonstration. Journal of Environmental Engineering 122:515–523
Simon H. 1981. The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 247 pp
Smart Growth Network (SGN). 2004. Getting to smart growth: Hundred policies for implementation. www.smartgrowth.org/pdf/gettosg.pdf. Retrieved June 9, 2004
Talen, E. 2002. GIS helps evaluate living patterns. Geo World. http://geoplace.com/gw/2002/0201/0201ss.asp. Retrieved March 25, 2002
US Environmental Protection Agency. 2003. EPA’s Smart Growth Index in 20 pilot communities: Using GIS sketch modeling to advance smart growth. http://WWW. epa.gov/smartgrowth
Wegener, M. 1998. GIS and spatial planning. Environment and Planning 25 Anniversary Issue 48–52
Wu F,. 1998. SimLand: A prototype to simulate land conversion through the integrated GIS and CA with AHP-derived transition rules. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 12:63–82
Yoon K. P., C.-L. Hwang. 1995. Multiple attribute decision making: An introduction. Sage Publications, London, 83 pp
Acknowledgments
The comments of the editor and reviewers on earlier version of this paper are gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Banai, R. Land Resource Sustainability for Urban Development: Spatial Decision Support System Prototype. Environmental Management 36, 282–296 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-1047-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-1047-0