Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of the Effect of Dermatochalasis and Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty Surgery on Corneal Epithelial Thickness Alterations

  • Original Article
  • Oculoplastic
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of different grades of dermatochalasis (DC) and upper eyelid blepharoplasty (UEB) surgery on corneal epithelial thickness (CET), objectively using anterior segment-optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) measurements.

Methods

90 eyes of patients with DC were divided into three groups according to the severity of the DC. Forty-one eyes of age and sex-matched patients without DC were randomly selected as the control group. The study did not include patients with more than 2 D of spherical refractive error and more than 1.5 D of astigmatism, a history of previous eyelid surgery, ocular surface disease, contact lens use, and ophthalmic eye drop use. CET measurements of all the patients were performed with an AS-OCT (RTVue-XR, Optovue Inc., USA).

Results

There were statistically significant differences in the CET of the superior, superonasal, superotemporal, inferotemporal, and temporal sectors between the DC and control groups (p = 0.001, p = 0.02, p = 0.03, p = 0.02, p = 0.04, respectively). While there were no differences in CET among the sectors of the control group, there was a difference in CET among some sectors of the DC group. When the DC group was subdivided by severity, there was no difference between subgroups for CET across all sectors both preoperatively and postoperatively. In the measurements made 6 months after UEB surgery, the CET in all sectors increased statistically significantly compared to those measured in the preoperative period.

Conclusion

This study revealed that DC reshaped the corneal epithelium and UEB surgery restored this remodeling 6 months after surgery.

Level of Evidence III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dogan E, AkbasKocaoglu F, YalnizAkkaya Z, Elbeyli A, Burcu A, Ornek F (2015) Scheimpflug imaging in dermatochalasis patients before and after upper eyelid blepharoplasty. Semin Ophthalmol 30:193–1966

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim JW, Lee H, Chang M, Park M, Lee TS, Baek S (2013) What causes increased contras sensitivity and improved functional visual acuity after upper eyelid blepharoplasty? Craniofac Surg 24:1582–1585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bhattacharjee K, Misra D, Singh M, Deori N (2020) Long-term changes in contrast-sensitivity, corneal topography and higher-order aberrations after upper eyelid blepharoplasty: a prospective interventional study. Indian J Ophthalmol 68:2906–2910

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Simon G, Ren Q, Kervick GN, Parel JM (1993) Optics of the corneal epithelium. Refract Corneal Surg 9(1):42–50

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang J, Fonn D, Simpson TL, Jones L (2002) The measurement of corneal epithelial thickness in response to hypoxia using optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 133:315–319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rocha KM, Perez-Straziota E, Stulting RD, Randleman JB (2013) SD-OCT analysis of regional epithelial thickness profiles in keratoconus, postoperative corneal ectasia, and normal eyes. J Refract Surg 29:173–179

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Rattan SA, Anwar DS (2020) Comparison of corneal epithelial thickness profile in dry eye patients, keratoconus suspect, and healthy eyes. Eur J Ophthalmol 30(6):1506–1511

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sin S, Simpson TL (2006) The repeatability of corneal and corneal epithelial thickness measurements using optical coherence tomography. Optom Vis Sci 83(6):360–365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jacobs LC, Liu F, Bleyen I, Gunn DA, Hofman A, Klaver CC, Uitterlinden AG, Neumann HA, Bataille V, Spector TD, Kayser M, Nijsten T (2014) Intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors for sagging eyelids. JAMA Dermatol 150(8):836–843

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wan K, Yau HT, Cheung SW, Cho P (2021) Corneal thickness changes in myopic children during and after short-term orthokeratology lens wear. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 41(4):757–767

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Abdolalizadeh P, Karimi M, Latifi G, Nouri L, Hashemian MN, Hashemian H, Mehrpour M, Alipour F (2022) Role of different types of contact lenses in epithelial thickness. Eye Contact Lens 48(5):210–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cui X, Hong J, Wang F, Deng SX, Yang Y, Zhu X, Wu D, Zhao Y, Xu J (2014) Assessment of corneal epithelial thickness in dry eye patients. Optom Vis Sci 91(12):1446–1454

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Dogan AS, Acar M, Kosker M, Arslan N, Gurdal C (2018) Alterations in corneal epithelial thickness in patients with congenital myogenic eyelid ptosis. Int Ophthalmol 38(1):53–57

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Vida RS (2022) Epithelial thickness mapping for corneal refractive surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 33(4):258–268

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kanellopoulos AJ, Asimellis G (2014) In vivo 3-dimension corneal epithelial thickness mapping as an indicator of dry eye: preliminary clinical assessment. Am J Ophthalmol 157(1):63–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kobayashi A, Yokogawa H, Sugiyama K (2012) In vivo laser confocal microscopy findings in patients with map-dot-fingerprint (epithelial basement membrane) dystrophy. Clin Ophthalmol 6:1187–1190

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kalas T, Gunn D (2022) Corneal epithelial remodeling as a cause of chalazion-induced hypermetropia. Cornea 41(6):785–788

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. AltinEkin M, KaradenizUgurlu S (2020) Prospective analysis of visual function changes in patients with dermatochalasis after upper eyelid blepharoplasty. Eur J Ophthalmol 30(5):978–984

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There is no funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sücattin İlker Kocamış.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest to declare.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The ethics committee of our institution approved this study.

Informed Consent

All the patients were given written informed consent before the procedures.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arslan, N., Kocamış, S.İ., Sabur, H. et al. Evaluation of the Effect of Dermatochalasis and Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty Surgery on Corneal Epithelial Thickness Alterations. Aesth Plast Surg 47, 647–651 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-03131-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-03131-y

Keywords

Navigation