Skip to main content
Log in

Perceptions of Silicone Structure and Function

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Fuzzard SK, Teixeira R, Zinn R (2019) A review of the literature on the management of silicone implant incompatibility syndrome. Aesthet Plast Surg 43(5):1145–1149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Caravantes-Cortes M, Roldan-Valadez E, Zwojewski-Martinez RD et al (2020) Breast prosthesis syndrome: pathophysiology and management algorithm. Aesthet Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01663-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hunsaker DH, Martin PJ (1995) Allergic reactions to solid silicone implant in medial thyroplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 113(6):782–784

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kunda LD, Stidham KR, Inserra MM, Roland PS, Franklin D, Roberson JB Jr (2006) Silicone allergy: a new cause for cochlear implant extrusion and its management. Otol Neurotol 27(8):1078–1082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Oprea ML, Schnöring H, Sachweh JS, Ott H, Biertz J, Vazquez-Jimenez JF (2009) Allergy to pacemaker silicone compounds: recognition and surgical management. Ann Thorac Surg 87(4):1275–1277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Stuck BA, Hecksteden K, Klimek L, Hörmann K (2004) Type I hypersensitivity to a silicone tube after laryngectomy. HNO 52(3):255–257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Magnusson M, Beath K, Cooter R et al (2019) The epidemiology of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma in Australia and New Zealand confirms the highest risk for Grade 4 surface breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 143(5):1285–1292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mohebali K, Wixtrom RN (2018) Breast implant engineering and performance. Plast Reconstr Surg 142:6S–11S

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kang S, Kim J, Kim S et al (2020) Efficient reduction of fibrous capsule formation around silicone breast implants densely grafted with 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine (MPC) polymers by heat-induced polymerization. Biomater Sci 8(6):1580–1591

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Janowsky EC, Kupper LL, Hulka BS (2000) Meta-analysis of the relation between silicone breast implants and the risk of connective-tissue disease. N Engl J Med 342(11):781–790

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Magnusson MR, Cooter RD, Rakhorst H, McGuire PA, Adams WP Jr, Deva AK (2019) Breast implant illness: a way forward. Plast Reconstr Surg 143:74S–81S

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nevio Cimolai.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest to disclose.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

For this type of study, informed consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cimolai, N. Perceptions of Silicone Structure and Function. Aesth Plast Surg 44, 1914–1915 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01699-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01699-x

Navigation