Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Does Standardized Practice Reduce Complications in Breast Augmentation Compared with Non-standardized One?

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Santorelli A, Rossano F, Cagli B et al (2019) Standardized practice reduces complications in breast augmentation: results with the first 290 consecutive cases versus non-standardized comparators. Aesthet Plast Surg 43:336–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Somogyi RB, Brown MH (2015) Outcomes in primary breast augmentation: a single surgeon’s review of 1539 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 135:87–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tebbetts JB (2010) Augmentation mammaplasty: redefining the patient and surgeon experience. Mosby Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  4. Li S, Chen L, Liu W et al (2018) Capsular contracture rate after breast augmentation with periareolar versus other two (inframammary and transaxillary) incisions: a meta-analysis. Aesthet Plast Surg 42:32–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Calobrace MB, Stevens WG, Capizzi PJ et al (2018) Risk factor analysis for capsular contracture: a 10-year Sientra study using round, smooth, and textured implants for breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 141:20S–28S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by PUMC Youth Fund & the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 3332015156).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Plastic Surgery Hospital (Institute), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, No. 33 Badachu Road, Shijingshan District, Beijing, 100144, China

    Chengcheng Li, Xingyi Du, Yi-ye Ouyang & Chunjun Liu

Authors
  1. Chengcheng Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xingyi Du
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yi-ye Ouyang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chunjun Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chunjun Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement of Human and Animal Rights or Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

For this type of study informed consent is not required.

Financial Disclosure Statement

PUMC Youth Fund & the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 3332015156) were received for this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, C., Du, X., Ouyang, Yy. et al. Does Standardized Practice Reduce Complications in Breast Augmentation Compared with Non-standardized One?. Aesth Plast Surg 43, 1415–1416 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01414-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01414-5

Search

Navigation