Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of the Neo-umbilicus Cutaneous Sensitivity Following Abdominoplasty

  • Original Article
  • Body Contouring
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Abdominal cutaneous sensitivity loss after abdominoplasty is an undesirable outcome. However, little is known in the literature about sensitivity changes of the neo-umbilicus after abdominoplasty. The aim of this study was to evaluate post-abdominoplasty cutaneous sensitivity of the neo-umbilicus using clinical, quantitative, and reproducible methods.

Methods

Patients who underwent abdominoplasty were included, whereas the control group consisted of healthy volunteers with similar demographic characteristics but who did not undergo abdominoplasty. The umbilicus was divided into five zones, and superficial tactile sensitivity and spatial orientation were assessed subjectively (score 1–4) and objectively (Semmes–Weinstein monofilament examination).

Results

Twenty patients (45 ± 12 years) operated on consecutively between April 2012 and May 2016 and 14 healthy volunteers in the control group (39 ± 9 years) could be included. Although there were statistically significant differences (p = 0.0005) in the average cutaneous pressure thresholds between the control group (0.4 g/mm2, range 0.07–2 g/mm2) and the study group (0.4 g/mm2, range 0.07–4 g/mm2), patient satisfaction after a mean follow-up of 33 ± 16 months (range 10–62 months) was acceptable (mean satisfaction score 1.8 ± 0.7). Furthermore, spatial perceptions were precise in all patients and similar to the control group.

Conclusion

Our long-term results indicate that spontaneous reinnervation of the neo-umbilicus after abdominoplasty together with accurate spatial orientation can occur.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Papadopulos NA, Staffler V, Mirceva V et al (2012) Does abdominoplasty have a positive influence on quality of life, self-esteem, and emotional stability? Plast Reconstr Surg 129:957e–962e

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aherrera AS, Pincus DJ, Vernadakis AJ, Pandya SN (2015) Evaluation of abdominal cutaneous sensibility following abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 135:526e–532e

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Duchateau J, Declety A, Lejour M (1988) Innervation of the rectus abdominis muscle: implications for rectus flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 82:223–228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fels KW, Cunha MS, Sturtz GP, Gemperli R, Ferreira MC (2005) Evaluation of cutaneous abdominal wall sensibility after abdominoplasty. Aesthet Plast Surg 29:78–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Presman B, Finnerup K, Andresen SR, Nikolajsen L, Finnerup NB (2015) Persistent pain and sensory abnormalities after abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 3:e561

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Visconti G, Visconti E, Bonomo L, Salgarello M (2015) Concepts in navel aesthetic: a comprehensive surface anatomy analysis. Aesthet Plast Surg 39:43–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McGlone F, Reilly D (2010) The cutaneous sensory system. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 34:148–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Saad El-Dien HM, Abdelwahed Hussein MR, El-Oteify M (2013) Sensory innervation of the female human umbilical skin: morphological studies. Ultrastruct Pathol 37:62–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schlenz I, Rigel S, Schemper M, Kuzbari R (2003) Alteration of nipple and areola sensitivity by reduction mammaplasty: a prospective comparison of five techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:743–751 (discussion 752–744)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hamdi M, Blondeel P, Van de Sijpe K, Van Landuyt K, Monstrey S (2003) Evaluation of nipple-areola complex sensitivity after the latero-central glandular pedicle technique in breast reduction. Br J Plast Surg 56:360–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chiari A Jr, Nunes TA, Grotting JC, Cotta FB, Gomes RC (2012) Breast sensitivity before and after the L short-scar mammaplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36:105–114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Place MJ, Song T, Hardesty RA, Hendricks DL (1997) Sensory reinnervation of autologous tissue TRAM flaps after breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 38:19–22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shaw WW, Orringer JS, Ko CY, Ratto LL, Mersmann CA (1997) The spontaneous return of sensibility in breasts reconstructed with autologous tissues. Plast Reconstr Surg 99:394–399

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Le Louarn C, Pascal JF (2000) High superior tension abdominoplasty. Aesthet Plast Surg 24:375–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rangaswamy M (2008) Lipoabdominoplasty: a versatile and safe technique for abdominal contouring. Indian J Plast Surg 41:S48–S51

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Ducic I, Zakaria HM, Felder JM 3rd, Arnspiger S (2014) Abdominoplasty-related nerve injuries: systematic review and treatment options. Aesthet Surg J 34:284–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hatef DA, Kenkel JM, Nguyen MQ et al (2008) Thromboembolic risk assessment and the efficacy of enoxaparin prophylaxis in excisional body contouring surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 122:269–279

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. van Uchelen JH, Werker PM, Kon M (2001) Complications of abdominoplasty in 86 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1869–1873

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Iglesias M, Ortega-Rojo A, Garcia-Alvarez MN et al (2012) Demographic factors, outcomes, and complications in abdominal contouring surgery after massive weight loss in a developing country. Ann Plast Surg 69:54–58

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Friedland JA, Maffi TR (2008) MOC-PS(SM) CME article: abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 121:1–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tomaszewski KA, Popieluszko P, Henry BM et al (2016) The surgical anatomy of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve in the inguinal region: a meta-analysis. Hernia 20:649–657

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Hensel JM, Lehman JA Jr, Tantri MP et al (2001) An outcomes analysis and satisfaction survey of 199 consecutive abdominoplasties. Ann Plast Surg 46:357–363

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Momeni A, Heier M, Torio-Padron N et al (2009) Correlation between complication rate and patient satisfaction in abdominoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 62:5–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Novak CB, von der Heyde RL (2015) Rehabilitation of the upper extremity following nerve and tendon reconstruction: when and how. In: Seminars in plastic surgery, vol 29, pp 73–80

  25. Anastakis DJ, Chen R, Davis KD, Mikulis D (2005) Cortical plasticity following upper extremity injury and reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 32:617–634 (viii)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pare M, Elde R, Mazurkiewicz JE, Smith AM, Rice FL (2001) The Meissner corpuscle revised: a multiafferented mechanoreceptor with nociceptor immunochemical properties. J Neurosci 21:7236–7246

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tindholdt TT, Tonseth KA (2008) Spontaneous reinnervation of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps after secondary breast reconstruction. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 42:28–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sinis N, Lamia A, Gudrun H, Schoeller T, Werdin F (2012) Sensory reinnervation of free flaps in reconstruction of the breast and the upper and lower extremities. Neural Regen Res 7:2279–2285

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Sino-Swiss Science and Technology Cooperation (Project No.: EG 07-032014). Swiss Society of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel F. Kalbermatten.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tremp, M., Wang, W., Oranges, C.M. et al. Evaluation of the Neo-umbilicus Cutaneous Sensitivity Following Abdominoplasty. Aesth Plast Surg 41, 1382–1388 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0951-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0951-7

Keywords

Navigation