Skip to main content
Log in

RE: Prosthetic Breast Implant Rupture: Imaging—Pictorial Essay

Full Cooperation Between Surgeon and Radiologist: “The Best of Both Worlds”

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cooperation between plastic surgeons and radiologists is fundamental when breast prosthesis rupture is suspected. We describe our experience managing the case of suspected implant rupture in a patient that underwent CT scan imaging for thoracic pain. Poor clinical information given to radiologists leads to wrong diagnosis: during surgery, both prostheses were checked revealing no signs of rupture. Full communication among different specialists involved in the multidisciplinary approach is always recommended, and an easy-to-use national breast implant register would allow a better management of patients’ follow-up and eventual preoperative planning.

Level of evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Colombo G, Ruvolo V, Stifanese R, Perillo M, Garlaschi A (2011) Prosthetic breast implant rupture: imaging–pictorial essay. Aesthetic Plast Surg 35(5):891–900

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bassetti E, Pediconi F, Luciani ML, Santucci E, Miglio E, Candreva R (2011) Breast prosthesis: management of patients after plastic surgery. J Ultrasound 14(3):113–121

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Glazebrook KN, Leng S, Jacobson SR, McCollough CM (2016) Dual-energy CT for evaluation of intra- and extracapsular silicone implant rupture. Case Rep Radiol 2016:6323709

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Dessy LA, Mazzocchi M, Corrias F, Sorvillo V, Scuderi N (2013) Correction of tuberous breast with small volume asymmetry by using a new adjustable implant. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 17(7):977–983

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cooter RD, Barker S, Carroll SM, Evans GR, von Fritschen U, Hoflehner H, Le Louarn C, Lumenta DB, Mathijssen IM, McNeil J, Mulgrew S, Mureau MA, Perks G, Rakhorst H, Randquist C, Topaz M, Verheyden C, de Waal J (2015) International importance of robust breast device registries. Plast Reconstr Surg 135(2):330–336

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors have no commercial interest in the subject of study and they have no source of any financial or material support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Marcasciano.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marcasciano, M., Conversi, A., Kaciulyte, J. et al. RE: Prosthetic Breast Implant Rupture: Imaging—Pictorial Essay. Aesth Plast Surg 41, 1478–1480 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0942-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0942-8

Keywords

Navigation