Skip to main content
Log in

The Sling Lift: An Ancillary Procedure for Malar Rejuvenation

  • Innovative Technology
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The malar region has been a crucial target in many facial rejuvenation techniques because the beauty and youthful contour of a convex midface and a smooth eyelid–cheek sulcus are key features of a pleasing face-lift result. The full midface subperiosteal lift has helped to address these issues. However, the desire of patients currently for a rapid recovery and return to work with a natural-looking result has influenced procedural selection. Another concern is for safer procedures with reduced potential risk. Progressively fewer invasive techniques, such as the minimal access cranial suspension (MACS) lift, have been a response to these core concerns.

Methods

After 3 years of performing the conventional three purse-string suture MACS lift, the author developed a practical procedural modification. For a total of 17 patients, the author combined limited regional subperiosteal lift and periosteal fixation with a simple sling approach to the more fully released malar tissue mass to make a single-point suspension just above the lateral orbital rim.

Results

The percutaneous sling lift appears to offer a degree and naturalness of rejuvenation of the malar region similar to those of the MACS lift and the full subperiosteal midface lift, but with fewer suspension points and less undermining. Also, the author observed less ecchymosis and edema than with the full midface subperiosteal lift, as would be expected. In all 17 cases, the need for the second and third purse-string sutures was eliminated.

Conclusions

The early results for the percutaneous sling lift indicate that it offers promising results, rapid recovery, and reduced risk of serious complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 11 .

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Badin AZD, Casagrande C, Roberts T III, Saltz R, Moraes LM, Santiago M, Chiaratti MG: Minimally invasive facial rejuvenation: Endolaser mid-face lift. Aesth Plast Surg 25:447–453, 2001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Badin AZD, Casagrande C, Saltz R: Rejuvenescimento facial (cirurgia videoendoscopica e procedimentos ancilares). Revinter: Rio de Janeiro, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  3. Casagrande C: Direct needle fixation in endoscopic facial rejuvenation. Aesth Surg J 20:361–367, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  4. Graf R, Pace D, Araujo LR: Endoscopic forehead and midface surgery: Eight years experience. Rev Soc Bras Cir Plast 20:197–203, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  5. Moss CJ, Mendelson BC, Taylor GI: Surgical anatomy of the ligamentous attachments in the temple and periorbital region. Plast Reconstr Surg 154:1475–1498, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  6. Psillakis JM: The use of craniofacial surgical techniques in rhytidoplasty of the superior third of the face. Cir Plast Ibero-Latino Am 10:297, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ramirez OM: Endoscopic full face-lift. Aesth Plast Surg 18:363, 1994

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ramirez OM: The subperiosteal approach for the correction of the deep nasolabial fold and the central third of the face. Clin Plast Surg 22:341, 1995

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ramirez OM, Maillard GF, Musolas A: The extended subperiosteal facelift: A definitive soft tissue remodeling for facial rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg 88:227, 1991

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ramirez OM, Pozner JN: Subperiosteal minimally invasive laser endoscopic rhytidectomy: The SMILE face-lift. Aesth Plast Surg 20:463–470, 1996

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Santana PM: Craniofacial methods in rhytidoplasty. Cir Plast Ibero-Latino Am 10:322, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  12. Seckel BR: Facial Danger Zones (avoiding nerve injury in facial plastic surgery). Di-Livros: Rio de Janeiro, 1998

  13. Tonnard P, Verpaele A, et al. Minimal access cranial suspension lift: A modified S-lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:2074, 2002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tonnard P, Verpaele A, Gaia S: Optimizing results from minimal access cranial suspension lifting. Aesth Plast Surg 29:213–320, 2005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yaremchuk MJ: Making concave faces convex. Aesth Plast Surg 29:141–147, 2005

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julio Wilson Fernandes M.D..

Additional information

Presented as “My Approach to the MACS Lift Surgery” at the 18th Congress of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery in Rio de Janeiro, August 2006.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fernandes, J.W. The Sling Lift: An Ancillary Procedure for Malar Rejuvenation. Aesth Plast Surg 31, 454–459 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-006-0236-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-006-0236-z

Keywords

Navigation