Abstract
Background
There has been no clinical evidence to justify continued pembrolizumab therapy beyond progression in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC).
Materials and methods
We conducted a multicenter retrospective study evaluating the clinical efficacy of continued use of pembrolizumab beyond progression in patients with metastatic UC. Data from 51 patients with metastatic UC, who developed progression during second-line pembrolizumab therapy, were analyzed. Progression was defined based on the Immunotherapy Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. The outcome was overall survival (OS). The association between continued treatment, OS, and the risk of all-cause mortality was tested using log-rank test, conventional and time-dependent Cox regression models.
Results
No significant difference in patient characteristics was noted between patients continuing pembrolizumab beyond progression (N = 21) and those discontinuing pembrolizumab (N = 30). Median OS was significantly longer in the continuation group (17.8 vs. 8.8 months; P = 0.038). A multivariable conventional Cox regression model identified continued pembrolizumab administration as a significant independent prognostic factor of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.21, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.05–0.90, P = 0.036), irrespective of the time from treatment initiation to progression and concurrent clinical progression. Further, longer duration of pembrolizumab treatment beyond progression was independently associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality in a multivariable time-dependent Cox regression model, when used as a time-dependent variable (HR: 0.07, 95% CI: 0.01–0.45, P = 0.006).
Conclusions
Continued pembrolizumab administration beyond progression might be beneficial in patients with metastatic UC who were clinically stable.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CI:
-
Confidence interval
- ECOG:
-
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
- HR:
-
Hazard ratio
- iCPD:
-
Immune-confirmed progressive disease
- IQR:
-
Interquartile range
- iSD:
-
Immune stable disease
- iUPD:
-
Immune-unconfirmed progressive disease
- LN:
-
Lymph node
- OS:
-
Overall survival
- PD:
-
Progressive disease
- PD-1:
-
Programmed death -1
- RECIST:
-
Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
- UC:
-
Urothelial carcinoma
References
von der Maase H, Sengelov L, Roberts JT et al (2005) Long-term survival results of a randomized trial comparing gemcitabine plus cisplatin, with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, plus cisplatin in patients with bladder cancer. J clin oncol 23:4602–4608. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.07.757
Bellmunt J, de Wit R, Vaughn DJ et al (2017) Pembrolizumab as second-line therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma. N Engl J Med 376:1015–1026. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1613683
Wolchok JD, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R et al (2017) Overall survival with combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med 377:1345–1356. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1709684
Brahmer J, Reckamp KL, Baas P et al (2015) Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced squamous-cell non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 373:123–135. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1504627
Borghaei H, Paz-Ares L, Horn L et al (2015) Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 373:1627–1639. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1507643
Motzer RJ, Tannir NM, McDermott DF et al (2018) Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab versus Sunitinib in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 378:1277–1290. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1712126
Chiou VL, Burotto M (2015) Pseudoprogression and immune-related response in solid tumors. J clin oncol 33:3541–3543. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.61.6870
Borcoman E, Nandikolla A, Long G et al (2018) Patterns of response and progression to immunotherapy. Am Soc Clinical Oncol educ book 38:169–178. https://doi.org/10.1200/EDBK_200643
Seymour L, Bogaerts J, Perrone A et al (2017) iRECIST: guidelines for response criteria for use in trials testing immunotherapeutics. Lancet Oncol 18:e143–e152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30074-8
Haddad R, Concha-Benavente F, Blumenschein G et al (2019) Nivolumab treatment beyond RECIST-defined progression in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in CheckMate 141: A subgroup analysis of a randomized phase 3 clinical trial. Cancer 125:3208–3218. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32190
George S, Motzer RJ, Hammers HJ et al (2016) Safety and efficacy of nivolumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated beyond progression. JAMA Oncol 2:1179–1186. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0775
Long GV, Weber JS, Larkin J et al (2017) Nivolumab for patients with advanced melanoma treated beyond progression analysis of 2 phase 3 clinical trials. JAMA Oncol 3:1511–1519. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.1588
Eggermont AMM, Kicinski M, Blank CU et al (2020) Association between immune-related adverse events and recurrence-free survival among patients with stage III melanoma randomized to receive pembrolizumab or placebo: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA oncol 6(4):519–527
Giobbie-Hurder A, Gelber RD, Regan MM (2013) Challenges of guarantee-time bias. J clin oncol 31:2963–2969. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.49.5283
Cho IS, Chae YR, Kim JH et al (2017) Statistical methods for elimination of guarantee-time bias in cohort studies: a simulation study. BMC Med Res Methodol 17:126. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0405-6
Yuasa T, Urakami S, Yonese J (2018) Recent advances in medical therapy for metastatic urothelial cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 23:599–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-018-1260-0
Grothey A, Sugrue MM, Purdie DM et al (2008) Bevacizumab beyond first progression is associated with prolonged overall survival in metastatic colorectal cancer: results from a large observational cohort study (BRiTE). J clin oncol 26:5326–5334. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.16.3212
Puzanov I, Amaravadi RK, McArthur GA et al (2015) Long-term outcome in BRAF(V600E) melanoma patients treated with vemurafenib: Patterns of disease progression and clinical management of limited progression. Eur j cancer 51:1435–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2015.04.010
von Minckwitz G, du Bois A, Schmidt M et al (2009) Trastuzumab beyond progression in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive advanced breast cancer: a german breast group 26/breast international group 03–05 study. J clin oncol 27:1999–2006. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.19.6618
Burotto M, Wilkerson J, Stein W et al (2014) Continuing a cancer treatment despite tumor growth may be valuable: sunitinib in renal cell carcinoma as example. PLoS ONE 9:e96316
Ou SHI, Jänne PA, Bartlett CH et al (2014) Clinical benefit of continuing ALK inhibition with crizotinib beyond initial disease progression in patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC. Ann Oncol 25:415–422. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdt572
Petrelli F, Barni S (2013) A pooled analysis of 2618 patients treated with trastuzumab beyond progression for advanced breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 13:81–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2012.11.008
Escudier B, Motzer RJ, Sharma P et al (2017) Treatment beyond progression in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab in checkMate 025. Eur Urol 72:368–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.03.037
Ogihara K, Kikuchi E, Shigeta K et al (2020) The pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is a novel biomarker for predicting clinical responses to pembrolizumab in platinum-resistant metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients. Urol Oncol: Semin Orig Investig 38:602.e1-602.e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.02.005
Tamura D, Jinnouchi N, Abe M et al (2020) Prognostic outcomes and safety in patients treated with pembrolizumab for advanced urothelial carcinoma: experience in real-world clinical practice. Int J Clin Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-019-01613-9
Blumenthal GM, Theoret MR, Pazdur R (2017) Treatment beyond progression with immune checkpoint inhibitors—known unknowns. JAMA Oncol 3:1473. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.1819
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conception and design: WF, TK, SE. Collection and assembly of data: WF, TY, ST, YK, YI, YE, MT, FU, HO, MH. Data analysis and interpretation: WF, TK, TY, SK, FU, JM, YO, HA. Manuscript writing: all authors. Final approval of manuscript: all authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Shin Egawa is a paid consultant/advisor to Takeda, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Janssen, and Pfizer. The other authors declare no conflict of interest associated with this manuscript.
Ethics approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fukuokaya, W., Kimura, T., Yanagisawa, T. et al. Clinical benefit of continuing pembrolizumab treatment beyond progression in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Cancer Immunol Immunother 71, 229–236 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-021-02980-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-021-02980-x