Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical benefit of continuing pembrolizumab treatment beyond progression in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There has been no clinical evidence to justify continued pembrolizumab therapy beyond progression in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC).

Materials and methods

We conducted a multicenter retrospective study evaluating the clinical efficacy of continued use of pembrolizumab beyond progression in patients with metastatic UC. Data from 51 patients with metastatic UC, who developed progression during second-line pembrolizumab therapy, were analyzed. Progression was defined based on the Immunotherapy Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. The outcome was overall survival (OS). The association between continued treatment, OS, and the risk of all-cause mortality was tested using log-rank test, conventional and time-dependent Cox regression models.

Results

No significant difference in patient characteristics was noted between patients continuing pembrolizumab beyond progression (N = 21) and those discontinuing pembrolizumab (N = 30). Median OS was significantly longer in the continuation group (17.8 vs. 8.8 months; P = 0.038). A multivariable conventional Cox regression model identified continued pembrolizumab administration as a significant independent prognostic factor of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.21, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.05–0.90, P = 0.036), irrespective of the time from treatment initiation to progression and concurrent clinical progression. Further, longer duration of pembrolizumab treatment beyond progression was independently associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality in a multivariable time-dependent Cox regression model, when used as a time-dependent variable (HR: 0.07, 95% CI: 0.01–0.45, P = 0.006).

Conclusions

Continued pembrolizumab administration beyond progression might be beneficial in patients with metastatic UC who were clinically stable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CI:

Confidence interval

ECOG:

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

HR:

Hazard ratio

iCPD:

Immune-confirmed progressive disease

IQR:

Interquartile range

iSD:

Immune stable disease

iUPD:

Immune-unconfirmed progressive disease

LN:

Lymph node

OS:

Overall survival

PD:

Progressive disease

PD-1:

Programmed death -1

RECIST:

Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors

UC:

Urothelial carcinoma

References

  1. von der Maase H, Sengelov L, Roberts JT et al (2005) Long-term survival results of a randomized trial comparing gemcitabine plus cisplatin, with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, plus cisplatin in patients with bladder cancer. J clin oncol 23:4602–4608. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.07.757

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bellmunt J, de Wit R, Vaughn DJ et al (2017) Pembrolizumab as second-line therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma. N Engl J Med 376:1015–1026. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1613683

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Wolchok JD, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R et al (2017) Overall survival with combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med 377:1345–1356. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1709684

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Brahmer J, Reckamp KL, Baas P et al (2015) Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced squamous-cell non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 373:123–135. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1504627

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Borghaei H, Paz-Ares L, Horn L et al (2015) Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 373:1627–1639. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1507643

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Motzer RJ, Tannir NM, McDermott DF et al (2018) Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab versus Sunitinib in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 378:1277–1290. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1712126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Chiou VL, Burotto M (2015) Pseudoprogression and immune-related response in solid tumors. J clin oncol 33:3541–3543. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.61.6870

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Borcoman E, Nandikolla A, Long G et al (2018) Patterns of response and progression to immunotherapy. Am Soc Clinical Oncol educ book 38:169–178. https://doi.org/10.1200/EDBK_200643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Seymour L, Bogaerts J, Perrone A et al (2017) iRECIST: guidelines for response criteria for use in trials testing immunotherapeutics. Lancet Oncol 18:e143–e152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30074-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Haddad R, Concha-Benavente F, Blumenschein G et al (2019) Nivolumab treatment beyond RECIST-defined progression in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in CheckMate 141: A subgroup analysis of a randomized phase 3 clinical trial. Cancer 125:3208–3218. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. George S, Motzer RJ, Hammers HJ et al (2016) Safety and efficacy of nivolumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated beyond progression. JAMA Oncol 2:1179–1186. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0775

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Long GV, Weber JS, Larkin J et al (2017) Nivolumab for patients with advanced melanoma treated beyond progression analysis of 2 phase 3 clinical trials. JAMA Oncol 3:1511–1519. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.1588

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Eggermont AMM, Kicinski M, Blank CU et al (2020) Association between immune-related adverse events and recurrence-free survival among patients with stage III melanoma randomized to receive pembrolizumab or placebo: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA oncol 6(4):519–527

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Giobbie-Hurder A, Gelber RD, Regan MM (2013) Challenges of guarantee-time bias. J clin oncol 31:2963–2969. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.49.5283

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Cho IS, Chae YR, Kim JH et al (2017) Statistical methods for elimination of guarantee-time bias in cohort studies: a simulation study. BMC Med Res Methodol 17:126. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0405-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Yuasa T, Urakami S, Yonese J (2018) Recent advances in medical therapy for metastatic urothelial cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 23:599–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-018-1260-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Grothey A, Sugrue MM, Purdie DM et al (2008) Bevacizumab beyond first progression is associated with prolonged overall survival in metastatic colorectal cancer: results from a large observational cohort study (BRiTE). J clin oncol 26:5326–5334. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.16.3212

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Puzanov I, Amaravadi RK, McArthur GA et al (2015) Long-term outcome in BRAF(V600E) melanoma patients treated with vemurafenib: Patterns of disease progression and clinical management of limited progression. Eur j cancer 51:1435–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2015.04.010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. von Minckwitz G, du Bois A, Schmidt M et al (2009) Trastuzumab beyond progression in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive advanced breast cancer: a german breast group 26/breast international group 03–05 study. J clin oncol 27:1999–2006. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.19.6618

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Burotto M, Wilkerson J, Stein W et al (2014) Continuing a cancer treatment despite tumor growth may be valuable: sunitinib in renal cell carcinoma as example. PLoS ONE 9:e96316

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ou SHI, Jänne PA, Bartlett CH et al (2014) Clinical benefit of continuing ALK inhibition with crizotinib beyond initial disease progression in patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC. Ann Oncol 25:415–422. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdt572

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Petrelli F, Barni S (2013) A pooled analysis of 2618 patients treated with trastuzumab beyond progression for advanced breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 13:81–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2012.11.008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Escudier B, Motzer RJ, Sharma P et al (2017) Treatment beyond progression in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab in checkMate 025. Eur Urol 72:368–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.03.037

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ogihara K, Kikuchi E, Shigeta K et al (2020) The pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is a novel biomarker for predicting clinical responses to pembrolizumab in platinum-resistant metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients. Urol Oncol: Semin Orig Investig 38:602.e1-602.e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.02.005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Tamura D, Jinnouchi N, Abe M et al (2020) Prognostic outcomes and safety in patients treated with pembrolizumab for advanced urothelial carcinoma: experience in real-world clinical practice. Int J Clin Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-019-01613-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Blumenthal GM, Theoret MR, Pazdur R (2017) Treatment beyond progression with immune checkpoint inhibitors—known unknowns. JAMA Oncol 3:1473. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.1819

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception and design: WF, TK, SE. Collection and assembly of data: WF, TY, ST, YK, YI, YE, MT, FU, HO, MH. Data analysis and interpretation: WF, TK, TY, SK, FU, JM, YO, HA. Manuscript writing: all authors. Final approval of manuscript: all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wataru Fukuokaya.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Shin Egawa is a paid consultant/advisor to Takeda, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Janssen, and Pfizer. The other authors declare no conflict of interest associated with this manuscript.

Ethics approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fukuokaya, W., Kimura, T., Yanagisawa, T. et al. Clinical benefit of continuing pembrolizumab treatment beyond progression in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Cancer Immunol Immunother 71, 229–236 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-021-02980-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-021-02980-x

Keywords

Navigation