Abstract
Monocytes exhibit direct and indirect antitumour activities and may be potentially useful for various forms of adoptive cellular immunotherapy of cancer. However, blood is a limited source of them. This study explored whether monocytes can be obtained from bone marrow haematopoietic CD34+ stem cells of colon cancer patients, using previously described protocol of expansion and differentiation to monocytes of cord blood-derived CD34+ haematopoietic progenitors. Data show that in two-step cultures, the yield of cells was increased approximately 200-fold, and among these cells, up to 60 % of CD14+ monocytes were found. They consisted of two subpopulations: CD14++CD16+ and CD14+CD16−, at approximately 1:1 ratio, that differed in HLA-DR expression, being higher on the former. No differences in expression of costimulatory molecules were observed, as CD80 was not detected, while CD86 expression was comparable. These CD14+ monocytes showed the ability to present recall antigens (PPD, Candida albicans) and neoantigens expressed on tumour cells and tumour-derived microvesicles (TMV) to autologous CD3+ T cells isolated from the peripheral blood. Monocytes also efficiently presented the immunodominant HER-2/neu369–377 peptide (KIFGSLAFL), resulting in the generation of specific cytotoxic CD8+ T lymphocytes (CTL). The CD14++CD16+ subset exhibited enhanced cytotoxicity, though nonsignificant, towards tumour cells in vitro. These observations indicate that generation of monocytes from CD34+ stem cells of cancer patients is feasible. To our knowledge, it is the first demonstration of such approach that may open a way to obtain autologous monocytes for alternative forms of adaptive and adoptive cellular immunotherapy of cancer.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Monocytes/macrophages are important players in the host response to the growing tumour, with both enhancing and inhibitory capacities [1–3]. Despite the former, they are still regarded as potential cells that can be used for cellular forms of cancer immunotherapy. Blood monocytes isolated by cytapheresis have been used as a source of effector cytotoxic cells with rather disappointing results [4]. Such strategies require large numbers of monocytes, sometimes their activation, and are based on their direct cytotoxic activity. It is well established that peripheral blood (PB) monocytes exhibit significant cytotoxicity in vitro, which is mediated by some cytokines, for example, surface bound tumour necrosis factor (TNF), and release of reactive nitrogen and oxygen intermediates (RNI and ROI, respectively) [5–7]. Furthermore, PB monocytes can also act as antigen-presenting cells (APC) [8] which may be useful for presentation of tumour-associated antigens (TAA) for the generation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes used in adoptive immunotherapy [9]. Along this way, microvesicles (MV) that are shed by many cells of the body, in particular these rapidly proliferating, are playing an important role in cell to cell communication [10]. We have previously shown that tumour-derived MV (TMV) carry some determinants of the tumour cells and transfer them to monocytes [11]. It is also known that TMV express TAA [12]. Therefore, TMV may be a useful source of neoantigens to be presented to cytotoxic T cells.
Among two main subpopulations of PB monocytes, CD14++CD16− and CD14+CD16++ [13], the latter possess an enhanced antitumour activity, as judged by an increased production of TNF, interleukin (IL)-12, ROI and cytotoxic activity in vitro [14]. However, CD14+CD16++ cells are the minor population consisting of approximately 5–10 % of total monocytes [13, 15, 16], and nonproliferating cells may be very limited in numbers that are required for adoptive immunotherapy of cancer [4]. We have previously described the protocol for generation of monocytes from cord blood (CB) haematopoietic CD34+ progenitors which may give rise to potentially unlimited numbers of monocytes, as up to 1000-fold increase in cells in comparison with the initial inoculum was obtained, and among them up to 60 % of CD14+ cells consisting of two novel subsets CD14++CD16+ and CD14+CD16− were found. They differed not only in the CD14 but also in other determinants expression and functional activity [17].
In the present study, the attempts were undertaken to obtain monocytes from bone marrow (BM) haematopoietic CD34+ stem cells of patients with colon cancer and to determine their immunophenotype and some functional activities. This paper shows that monocytes with similar characteristics as CB CD34+ cell-derived monocytes, consisting of CD14++CD16+ and CD14+CD16− subsets, can be generated and exhibited APC capacity and cytotoxicity against tumour cells.
Materials and methods
Bone marrow biopsy and isolation of CD34+ cells
Bone marrow from patients with colorectal cancer (Duke’s C stage) was obtained by needle aspiration from the iliac crest, after written consents from the patients. The 15 patients (6 females and 9 males) with mean age 66 ± 14 years, before surgery and without any previous or current treatment were studied. Aspirates were suspended in saline, and mononuclear cells from them and from peripheral blood (PBMC) were isolated accordingly by standard density-gradient centrifugation (Lymphocyte Separation Medium 1077, PAA Laboratories GmbH, Pasching, Austria). Then the CD34+ cells were isolated from PBMC using the EasySep Human CD34 Positive Selection Kit (StemCell Technologies, Vancouver, Canada), based on magnetic cell sorting. The mean number of CD34+ cells recovered was 1.6 × 105 ± 1.4 × 105. The study was approved by the local Jagiellonian University Ethical Committee (No. KBET/86/B/2007 and KBET/193/B/2011).
Generation of monocytes
CD34+ cells were expanded and differentiated to monocytes in two-step cultures in the expansion and differentiation media, each step 7–10 days, as previously described [17].
Immunophenotyping
The following anti-human monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) were used: anti-CD14 allophycocyanin (APC)-conjugated, anti-CD16 and anti-HLA-DR, both phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated, anti-CD80 and anti-CD86, both fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated (all from BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA). In parallel, staining with appropriate isotype-matched mouse immunoglobulins (BD Pharmingen) were used as negative controls. After incubation for 30 min at 4 °C with mAbs or isotype controls, the cells were washed, resuspended in 0.3 ml of PBS containing 0.1 % sodium azide and analysed by flow cytometry (FACS Canto, BD Biosciences Immunocytometry Systems, San Jose, CA) using FACS DiVa v. 5.1 software. List mode data for 20,000 events were acquired, and statistical analysis was performed according to the fluorescence intensity of cells stained with appropriate isotype controls.
Isolation of monocytes and their subpopulations
Cells cultured in the differentiation medium were harvested, washed, and suspended at the concentration of 10 × 106/ml. After staining with anti-CD14 APC and anti-CD16 PE-conjugated mAbs, the cells were sorted using a 100 μm nozzle tip in FACS Aria II (BD Biosciences) into CD14+ monocytes (total population) and CD14++CD16+ and CD14+CD16− subpopulations. Sorted cells were collected into polystyrene Falcon 2057 tubes (BD Biosciences) precoated with foetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, Paisley, UK), to avoid plastic charging and cell attachment to the wall. The cells were washed and suspended in RPMI 1640 medium (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), supplemented with gentamycin (50 μg/ml), glutamine (2 mM) and 5 % FBS (all from Gibco).
Isolation of T lymphocytes
The CD3+ cells were isolated from PBMC (obtained as above) using the EasySep Human CD3 Positive Selection Kit (StemCell Technologies) based on magnetic cell sorting. Isolated CD3+ lymphocytes were suspended in Serum Free Type Cell Freezing Medium (Bambanker, Lymphotec, Tokyo, Japan) and stored at −80 °C until use.
Tumour cell lines and tumour-derived microvesicles (TMV)
Human pancreatic carcinoma (HPC-4) cell line established in this laboratory [18] and DeTa (colon carcinoma) were cultured and passaged as previously described [19], except that FBS was deprived of MV by centrifugation at 50,000×g for 1 h. TMV from HPC-4 cells (TMVHPC) were obtained as previously described [11]. Briefly, supernatants from well-grown cell cultures were collected and spun down at 2,000×g for 20 min to remove cell debris. Then supernatants were again pelleted (RC28S centrifuge, Sorvall, Newton, CT) at 50,000×g for 1 h at 4 °C. Pellets were washed several times in RPMI 1640 to remove FBS and finally resuspended in serum-free RPMI 1640 medium. Quantification of TMV protein concentration was evaluated by the Bradford method (BioRad, Hercules, CA). The cells and TMVHPC were tested for the presence of HER-2/neu using APC-labelled anti-HER-2/neu mAb (BD Biosciences) and flow cytometry analysis (FACS Canto).
Antigen presentation
The CD34+ cell-derived CD14+ monocytes (1 × 104/well) isolated by FACS sorting were cultured for 2 h in the presence of recall antigens: purified protein derivative (PPD, 25 μg/ml; Statenserum Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark) or Candida albicans (BioRad, Marnes-la-Coqunetté, France), or γ-irradiated (20 Gy) HPC-4 cells, or TMVHPC (5 μg/ml final concentration) or specific TAA antigen–HER2/neu immunodominant peptide KIFGSLAFL (5 μg/ml) in flat-bottom 96-well plates (Sarstedt, Numbrecht, Germany) in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with l-glutamine (2 mM), 10 % human AB serum and gentamycin (50 μg/ml, all from Gibco). Then, autologous T cells, after thawing and washing three times in RPMI 1640 medium, were added (1 × 105/well). T lymphocytes alone or with the appropriate stimulus and unstimulated cultures were used in parallel as negative controls. Cells were cultured in triplicates for 6 days at 37 °C in 5 % CO2 atmosphere, with a 6 h terminal pulse of [3H]-thymidine (1 μCi/well). Index of proliferation was calculated according to the formula: cpm of 3H-thymidine incorporation in the stimulated culture/cpm of appropriate negative control cultures. BM monocytes were generated, and T lymphocytes were isolated only from the patients whose PBMC proliferated in response to specified stimulants.
Detection of HER-2/neu-specific cytotoxic CD8+ T cells (CTL)
For the detection of HER-2/neu-specific CTL, only patients positive for HLA-A2 antigens were selected. Expression of HLA-A2 was determined by patients’ blood lymphocytes staining, using PE-conjugated mouse anti-human HLA-A2 mAb or PE-conjugated isotype-matched mouse immunoglobulins (both BD Pharmingen) as a negative control, followed by lysis of erythrocytes (FACS Lysing Solution, BD Biosciences) and flow cytometry analysis (FACS Canto). Patients positive for HLA-A2 expression were further tested for the presence of CTL specific to the immunodominant HER-2/neu369–377 epitope. For this purpose, whole blood samples were stained with PE-labelled HLA-A*0201 pentamer complex (ProImmune Ltd., Oxford, UK), folded around the HER-2/neu369–377-specific epitope. As a negative control, staining with HLA-A*0201 negative control pentamer (ProImmune) was used. The cells were incubated with indicated pentamers for 30 min. at 20 °C followed by washing and staining with peridinin chlorophyll protein complex (PerCP)-conjugated anti-CD3 and FITC-conjugated anti-CD8 mAb (BD Pharmingen) for 30 min. at 4 °C in the dark. Then, the cells were washed and erythrocytes were lysed (FACS Lysing Solution). After additional washing, cells were analysed by flow cytometry (FACS Canto). Data from a minimum 50,000 CD3+ cells were collected, and detection of more than 0.2 % HER-2/neu pentamer-stained CD3+ CD8+ cells above the background was considered positive.
Generation of HER-2/neu-specific CTL
To check the ability of patients BM CD34+ cell-derived monocytes to induce HER-2/neu-specific CTL, the cells from patients positive for primed HER-2/neu369–377 CTL were used. T cells were isolated and stored, as described above, until monocytes were generated. After thawing, T cells (5 × 105/well) were cultured with 5 × 104 BM stem cell-derived autologous CD14+ monocytes, in the presence of HER-2/neu369–377 peptide (KIFGSLAFL; 5 μg/ml, ProImmune) in RPMI 1640 medium, supplemented with l-glutamine (2 mM), 10 % human AB serum and gentamycin (50 μg/ml, all from Gibco). After 7 days of culture, the level of HER-2/neu369–377-specific CTL was determined by pentamer staining and flow cytometry analysis, as described above.
Determination of cytotoxic activity
Cytotoxicity of monocytes and their subpopulations towards HPC-4 and DeTa cells was determined as previously described [6]. Briefly, monocytes (5 × 104/well), tumour cells (2 × 104/well) or their mixtures were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium for 24 h. Then, the culture medium was removed and 100 μl per well of MTT (2 mg/ml; 1, 3-[4,5-dimetylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide, Sigma) dye solution was added for 4 h. Formed formazan was extracted with isopropyl alcohol (Fluka Chemie AG, Buchs, Switzerland), containing 0.04 N HCL and its content determined by spectrophotometrical measurement of absorbance using two different wavelengths: 570 and 630 nm. The percentage of cytotoxicity was calculated according to the formula previously described [20]:
Statistical analysis
Nonparametric one-way ANOVA test with the Microcal Origin software v. 5.0 (Northampton, MA) was used for analysis. The differences were considered significant at p < 0.05.
Results
Immunophenotype of CD34+ cell-derived monocytes
Following culture of CD34+ cells in the expansion and differentiation media, the number of cells increased approximately 200-fold (range 75–440) (Fig. 1a) with up to 60 % of CD14+ cells at day 20 (Fig. 1b). Among them, CD14++CD16+ and CD14+CD16− subsets in approximately 1:1 proportion were observed (Fig. 2a). Then, the expression of costimulatory molecules on these subsets was determined. The CD80 was not detected, CD86 was comparable on both subsets, while significantly higher HLA-DR expression on CD14++CD16+ monocytes was observed (Fig. 2b, c).
Determination of HER-2/neu expression on HPC-4 cells and TMVHPC
In order to check whether tumour cells and their TMV used exhibit TAA, expression of HER-2/neu was analysed by flow cytometry. Figure 3a shows that almost all HPC-4 cells expressed HER-2/neu. In contrast, its expression on TMVHPC was markedly lower when compared to the cells they originated from (Fig. 3b). Furthermore, both HPC-4 cells and to a lesser extend TMVHPC expressed MUC-1 and contained HER-2/neu, MAGE-1,3 and MUC-1 mRNA (data not shown). We concluded that both the cells and their TMV may be used as a source of TAA.
Proliferation of T lymphocytes in response to recall antigens or TAA
First, to validate the occurrence of T lymphocytes priming, we studied the response of patients’ PBMC to recall antigens (PPD, Candida), γ-irradiated HPC-4 cells or TMVHPC. For further studies, only T lymphocytes and BM CD34+ cells from patients whose PBMC responded to the stimulants were used. PBMC from 8 control subjects did not respond to HPC-4 and TMVHPC (data not shown). The autologous T lymphocytes isolated from PB of cancer patients were added to CD34+ cell-derived CD14+ monocytes and preexposed to recall antigens, γ-irradiated HPC-4 cells, and TMVHPC. Figure 4 shows that patients’ T lymphocytes responded to recall antigens when cultured with autologous monocytes. The cells also proliferated following stimulation with HER-2/neu-positive HPC-4 cells or TMVHPC. T lymphocytes alone cultured in the presence of stimulants did not proliferate. It was concluded that CD34+ cell-derived monocytes from cancer patients are able to present recall antigens and TAA to autologous T cells.
Generation of HER-2/neu369–377-specific CTL
As the HER-2/neu-derived peptides, naturally processed as TAA, are recognized by tumour-specific, HLA-A2-restricted CTL in colorectal cancer [21], in the next set of experiments we evaluated the proliferative response of T cells stimulated with HER2/neu369–377 immunodominant peptide in the presence of patients’ BM CD34+ cell-derived monocytes as APC. For this part of study, only patients positive for HLA-A2 expression and for the occurrence of primed CTL specific to the immunodominant HER-2/neu369–377 epitope in the blood were selected. This group contained four patients whose level of HER-2/neu-specific CTL in the blood exceeded 0.2 % (range 0.25–1.2 %). T cells isolated from these patients were cultured with population of autologous CD14+ BM CD34+ cell-derived monocytes and stimulated with HER-2/neu369–377 peptide (KIFGSLAFL). After 7 days of culture, proliferation index increased (Fig. 5a). Simultaneously, the level of peptide-specific CTL was determined by flow cytometry (Fig. 5b) and found to be significantly increased in cultures of monocytes with T cells, as compared to PBMC (Fig. 5c). This indicates that BM CD34+ cell-derived CD14+ monocytes induced propagation of HER2/neu-specific CTL.
Cytotoxicity
The total population of monocytes (CD14+ cells), used at different doses, exhibited substantial spontaneous cytotoxicity towards HPC-4 and DeTa cancer cells (Fig. 6). The CD14++CD16+ monocytes showed slightly higher cytotoxic/cytostatic activity in comparison with total population of monocytes or their CD14+CD16− subset, though the differences were statistically not significant.
Discussion
The present observations clearly demonstrate the feasibility of in vitro generation of monocytes from BM CD34+ haematopoietic stem cells of colon cancer patients. This model study was limited to a few patients and a small volume of BM aspirates that were available. We have used the protocol that was elaborated for production of monocytes from CB haematopoietic CD34+ stem cells, which enabled up to 1000-fold increase in cultured cells among which up to 60 % were CD14+ monocytes, and included the two-step cultures of the expansion and differentiation. These monocytes consisted of novel CD14++CD16+ and CD14+CD16− subpopulations with the ratio 1:2 and were clearly different from PB monocytes subsets by phenotype and functions [17]. The use of BM CD34+ cells from cancer patients also led to the production of up to 60 % CD14+ monocytes containing these subsets, however, occurring at the ratio 1:1. The reason for the differences in the ratios of the monocyte subsets generated from BM and CB CD34+ cells are unknown but may be due to the initial kinetic state of these cells or their level of lineage commitment [22]. These subsets showed similar expression of costimulatory molecule CD86, the lack of CD80 and an enhanced expression of HLA-DR detected mostly on CD14++CD16+ monocytes. The latter finding is similar to this CB monocyte subset, which shows an increased allostimulatory capacity [17] and PB CD14+CD16++ subpopulation [14]. The increased expression of HLA-DR may imply the higher potential of this subset to act as APC. However, due to a small number of cells available, antigen-presenting ability in respect to recall antigens and TAA was studied only for the total population of obtained monocytes. For determination of APC activity, patients were selected on the basis of their PBMC response to these antigens. The response of autologous T cells cultured with monocytes to recall antigens was observed, which is similar to PB monocytes [8]. Furthermore, such cultures stimulated with tumour cells or TMV that express HER-2/neu and possibly other neoantigens also responded. However, no proliferation was observed in cultures with the addition of patients’ plasma, which is known to contain TMV. This may be due to the relatively small concentration of TMV in the plasma [23]. Also, no response of T cells cultured with autologous CB CD34+ cell-derived monocytes, used as control, to the stimuli employed was detected, though these cultures were responding to polyclonal stimulation with anti-CD3 mAb (data not shown). This may indicate that nonprimed CB T lymphocytes did not proliferate in response to TAA. It is also supported by the finding that patients, but not healthy donors PBMC, responded to HPC-4 cells or TMVHPC (data not shown). We wish to suggest that response of patients’ T lymphocytes to HPC-4 cells and TMVHPC is driven by TAA which are expressed on their surface. Our data indicate that HER-2/neu-specific CTL are detected in the blood of colon cancer patients. These CTL were propagated in response to the immunodominant HER-2/neu369–377 peptide presented by patients’ autologous BM CD34+ cell-derived monocytes. This observation indicates that BM CD34+ cell-derived monocytes are potent APC and can be used for expansion of TAA-specific CTL; however, the protocol for more effective yield of expanded CTL needs to be further elaborated as the increase in HER-2/neu369–377 CTL number in our study was not impressive when compared to other studies using dendritic cells for stimulation with tumour-derived peptides [24, 25]. It should be noted that we used for their generation short-term cultures and low initial numbers of T cells, which were available for the study. In addition, we are aware of the fact that these cells were determined only phenotypically and no functional studies of CTL were performed, as the number of CTL obtained was very low. These limited observations were initiated only to proof the feasibility of this approach.
The question may arise, whether monocytes obtained from BM-derived CD34+ cells of healthy donors behave differently or in the same way as those from cancer patients. Due to ethical reasons, such controls were not introduced into our study. However, the data obtained from CB CD34+ cell-derived monocytes suggest that the absence of the response in their cultures with autologous T cells is rather due to the lack of priming the latter and not to the inability of monocytes to act as APC. This observation also indirectly indicates the specificity of the response of patients’ T cells.
It is known that human PB monocytes express spontaneous cytotoxicity towards tumour cells in vitro, which is thought to be associated with their production of TNF, ROI, RNI [6, 14, 26]. Among PB monocytes, CD14+CD16++ subset (nonclassical monocytes) [13] exhibits a higher cytotoxicity towards tumour cells [14]. The present data indicate that CD14+ monocytes generated from BM stem cells of colon cancer patients also show substantial cytotoxicity, which was rather associated (nonsignificantly) with CD14++CD16+ subset. This makes this subset similar to PB CD14+CD16++ subpopulation [14]. Therefore, we cannot assign cytotoxicity of generated monocytes to any particular subset. However, we wish to suggest that in general, BM CD34+ cell-derived monocytes of cancer patients possess a higher cytotoxic/cytostatic activity, around 40 %, while such monocytes generated from CB around 20 % [27].
In summary, the data presented provide evidence that it is possible to generate monocytes from BM haematopoietic CD34+ stem cells of cancer patients, which show the ability to effectively present TAA or HER-2/neu369–377 dominant peptide and to act as cytotoxic cells against tumour cells in vitro. It may open the way for generation, potentially on large scale, autologous monocytes that can be used in various forms of adaptive and adoptive cellular immunotherapy of cancer.
References
Balkwill F, Mantovani A (2001) Inflammation and cancer: back to Virchow? Lanvet 357:539–545
Mantovani A, Sica A (2010) Macrophages, innate immunity and cancer: balance, tolerance, and diversity. Curr Opin Immunol 22:231–237
Mytar B, Baj-Krzyworzeka M, Majka M, Stankiewicz D, Zembala M (2008) Human monocytes both enhance and inhibit the growth of human pancreatic cancer in SCID mice. Anticancer Res 28:187–192
Andreesen R, Hennemann B, Krause SW (1998) Adoptive immunotherapy of cancer using monocyte-derived macrophages: rationale, current status, and perspectives. J Leukoc Biol 64:419–426
Klostergaard J (1987) Role of tumor necrosis factor in monocyte/macrophage tumor cytotoxicity in vitro. Nat Immunol Cell Growth Regul 6:161–166
Mytar B, Siedlar M, Woloszyn M, Ruggiero I, Pryjma J, Zembala M (1999) Induction of reactive oxygen intermediates in human monocytes by tumour cells and their role in spontaneous monocyte cytotoxicity. Br J Cancer 79:737–743
Zembala M, Siedlar M, Marcinkiewicz J, Pryjma J (1994) Human monocytes are stimulated for nitric oxide release in vitro by some tumour cells but not by cytokines and lipopolysaccharide. Eur J Immunol 24:435–439
Zembala M, Uracz W, Ruggiero I, Mytar B, Pryjma J (1984) Isolation and functional characteristics of FcR+ and FcR− human monocyte subsets. J Immunol 133:1293–1299
Gattinoni L, Powell DJ Jr, Rosenberg SA, Restifo NP (2006) Adoptive immunotherapy of cancer: building on success. Nat Rev Immunol 6:383–393
Taylor DD, Gercel-Taylor C (2005) Tumour-derived exosomes and their role in cancer-associated T-cell signalling defects. Br J Cancer 92:305–311
Baj Krzyworzeka M, Szatanek R, Weglarczyk K, Baran J, Urbanowicz B, Branski P, Ratajczak MZ, Zembala M (2006) Tumour-derived microvesicles carry several determinants and mRNA of tumour cells and transfer some of these determinants to monocytes. Cancer Immunol Immunother 55:808–918
Sidhu SS, Mengistab AT, Tauscher AN, La Vail J, Basbaum C (2004) The microvesicle as a vehicle for EMMPRIN in tumor-stromal interactions. Oncogene 29:956–963
Ziegler-Heitbrock L, Ancuta P, Crowe S, Dalod M, Grau V, Hart DN, Leenen PJ, Liu YJ, MacPherson G, Randolph GJ, Scherberich J, Schmitz J, Shortman K, Sozzani S, Strobl H, Zembala M, Austyn JM, Lutz MB (2010) Nomenclature of monocytes and dendritic cells in blood. Blood 116:74–80
Szaflarska A, Baj-Krzyworzeka M, Siedlar M, Weglarczyk K, Ruggiero I, Hajto B, Zembala M (2004) Antitumour response of CD14+CD16+ monocyte subpopulation. Exp Hematol 32:748–755
Ziegler-Heitbrock HW, Fingerle G, Strobel M, Schraut W, Stelter F, Schutt C, Passlick B, Pforte A (1993) The novel subset of CD14+/CD16+ blood monocytes exhibits features of tissue macrophages. Eur J Immunol 23:2053–2058
Ziegler-Heitbrock HW (1996) Heterogeneity of human blood monocytes: the CD14+CD16+ subpopulation. Immunol Today 17:424–428
Stec M, Weglarczyk K, Baran J, Zuba E, Mytar B, Pryjma J, Zembala M (2007) Expansion and differentiation of CD14+CD16− and CD14++CD16+ human monocyte subsets from cord blood CD34+ haematopoietic progenitors. J Leukoc Biol 82:594–602
Siedlar M, Stachura J, Szczepanik AM, Popiela T, Mattei M, Vendetti S, Colizzi V, Zembala M (1995) Characterization of human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell line with high metastatic potential in SCID mice. Invasion Metastasis 15:60–69
Mytar B, Siedlar M, Woloszyn M, Colizzi V, Zembala M (2001) Cross-talk between human monocytes and cancer cells during reactive oxygen intermediates generation: the essential role of hyaluronan. Int J Cancer 94:727–732
Hruby Z, Beck KF (1997) Cytotoxic effect of autocrine and macrophage-derived nitric oxide on cultured rat mesangial cells. Clin Exp Immunol 107:76–82
Rongcun Y, Salazar-Onfray F, Charo Y, Malmberg K-J, Evrin K, Maes H, Kono K, Hising C, Petersson M, Larsson O, Lan L, Appella E, Sette A, Celis E, Kiessling R (1999) Identification of new HER2/neu-derived peptide epitopes that can elicit specific CTL against autologous and allogeneic carcinomas and melanomas. J Immunol 163:1037–1044
Takizawa H, Regoes RR, Boddupalli CS, Bonhoeffer S, Manz MG (2011) Dynamic variation in cycling of hematopoietic stem cells in steady state and inflammation. J Exp Med 208:273–284
Baran J, Baj-Krzyworzeka M, Weglarczyk K, Szatanek R, Zembala M, Barbasz J, Czupryna A, Szczepanik A, Zembala M (2010) Circulating tumour-derived microvesicles in plasma of gastric cancer patients. Cancer Immunol Immunother 59:841–850
Ho WY, Nguyen HN, Wolf M, Kuball J, Greenberg PD (2006) In vitro methods for generating CD8 + T-cell clones for immunotherapy from the naive repertoire. J Immunol Methods 310:40–52
Rasmussen AM, Borelli G, Hoel HJ, Lislerud K, Gaudernack G, Kvalheim G, Aarvak T (2010) Ex vivo expansion protocol for human tumor specific T cells for adoptive T cell therapy. J Immunol Methods 355:52–60
Mytar B, Woloszyn M, Macura-Biegun A, Hajto B, Ruggiero I, Piekarska B, Zembala M (2004) Involvement of pattern recognition receptors in the induction of cytokines and reactive oxygen intermediates production by human monocytes/macrophages stimulated with tumour cells. Anticancer Res 24:2287–2293
Stec M, Baran J, Szatanek R, Mytar B, Baj-Krzyworzeka M, Gozdzik J, Siedlar M, Zembala M (2012) Interactions of monocyte subpopulations generated from cord blood CD34(+) hematopoietic progenitors with tumor cells: Assessment of antitumor potential. Exp Hematol. 25, doi:10.1016/j.exphem.2012.07.008 (Epub ehead of print)
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education (grants no. N402 110 32/3560, N N401 052 538 and NN 401 290 239). We wish to thank Dr. Kazimierz Weglarczyk for flow cytometry data analysis and Ms. Irena Ruggiero for the excellent technical support.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Malgorzata Stec and Jarosław Baran: Equal contribution.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Stec, M., Baran, J., Szatanek, R. et al. Properties of monocytes generated from haematopoietic CD34+ stem cells from bone marrow of colon cancer patients. Cancer Immunol Immunother 62, 705–713 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-012-1375-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-012-1375-5