Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Imaging with 124I in differentiated thyroid carcinoma: is PET/MRI superior to PET/CT?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to compare integrated PET/CT and PET/MRI for their usefulness in detecting and categorizing cervical iodine-positive lesions in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer using 124I as tracer.

Methods

The study group comprised 65 patients at high risk of iodine-positive metastasis who underwent PET/CT (low-dose CT scan, PET acquisition time 2 min; PET/CT2) followed by PET/MRI of the neck 24 h after 124I administration. PET images from both modalities were analysed for the numbers of tracer-positive lesions. Two different acquisition times were used for the comparisons, one matching the PET/CT2 acquisition time (2 min, PET/MRI2) and the other covering the whole MRI scan time (30 min, PET/MRI30). Iodine-positive lesions were categorized as metastasis, thyroid remnant or inconclusive according to their location on the PET/CT images. Morphological information provided by MRI was considered for evaluation of lesions on PET/MRI and for volume information.

Results

PET/MRI2 detected significantly more iodine-positive metastases and thyroid remnants than PET/CT2 (72 vs. 60, p = 0.002, and 100 vs. 80, p = 0.001, respectively), but the numbers of patients with at least one tumour lesion identified were not significantly different (21/65 vs. 17/65 patients). PET/MRI30 tended to detect more PET-positive metastases than PET/MRI2 (88 vs. 72), but the difference was not significant (p = 0.07). Of 21 lesions classified as inconclusive on PET/CT, 5 were assigned to metastasis or thyroid remnant when evaluated by PET/MRI. Volume information was available in 34 % of iodine-positive metastases and 2 % of thyroid remnants on PET/MRI.

Conclusions

PET/MRI of the neck was found to be superior to PET/CT in detecting iodine-positive lesions. This was attributed to the higher sensitivity of the PET component, Although helpful in some cases, we found no substantial advantage of PET/MRI over PET/CT in categorizing iodine-positive lesions as either metastasis or thyroid remnant. Volume information provided by MRI for some iodine-positive lesions might be useful in dosimetry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Freudenberg LS, Jentzen W, Stahl A, Bockisch A, Rosenbaum-Krumme SJ. Clinical applications of 124I-PET/CT in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38 Suppl 1:S48–56. doi:10.1007/s00259-011-1773-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jentzen W, Freudenberg L, Eising EG, Sonnenschein W, Knust J, Bockisch A. Optimized 124I PET dosimetry protocol for radioiodine therapy of differentiated thyroid cancer. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:1017–23. doi:10.2967/jnumed.107.047159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jentzen W, Hoppenbrouwers J, van Leeuwen P, van der Velden D, van de Kolk R, Poeppel TD, et al. Assessment of lesion response in the initial radioiodine treatment of differentiated thyroid cancer using 124I PET imaging. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:1759–65. doi:10.2967/jnumed.114.144089.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee J, Nah KY, Kim RM, Oh YJ, An YS, Yoon JK, et al. Effectiveness of [(124)I]-PET/CT and [(18)F]-FDG-PET/CT for localizing recurrence in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma. J Korean Med Sci. 2012;27:1019–26. doi:10.3346/jkms.2012.27.9.1019.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. de Pont C, Halders S, Bucerius J, Mottaghy F, Brans B. 124I PET/CT in the pretherapeutic staging of differentiated thyroid carcinoma: comparison with posttherapy 131I SPECT/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40:693–700. doi:10.1007/s00259-012-2331-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Van Nostrand D, Moreau S, Bandaru VV, Atkins F, Chennupati S, Mete M, et al. (124)I positron emission tomography versus (131)I planar imaging in the identification of residual thyroid tissue and/or metastasis in patients who have well-differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2010;20:879–83. doi:10.1089/thy.2009.0430.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Czernin J, Herrmann K. The potential of PET/MRI imaging in oncology: a comment to a summary report of the First PET/MRI Workshop in Tuebingen in 2012. Mol Imaging Biol. 2013;15:372–3. doi:10.1007/s11307-013-0642-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Delso G, Furst S, Jakoby B, Ladebeck R, Ganter C, Nekolla SG, et al. Performance measurements of the Siemens mMR integrated whole-body PET/MR scanner. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:1914–22. doi:10.2967/jnumed.111.092726.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Czernin J, Ta L, Herrmann K. Does PET/MR imaging improve cancer assessments? Literature evidence from more than 900 patients. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:59S–62S. doi:10.2967/jnumed.114.141838.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Antoch G, Bockisch A. Combined PET/MRI: a new dimension in whole-body oncology imaging? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36 Suppl 1:S113–20. doi:10.1007/s00259-008-0951-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mattsson S, Soderberg M. Radiation dose management in CT, SPECT/CT and PET/CT techniques. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2011;147:13–21. doi:10.1093/rpd/ncr261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Martinez-Moller A, Souvatzoglou M, Delso G, Bundschuh RA, Chefd’hotel C, Ziegler SI, et al. Tissue classification as a potential approach for attenuation correction in whole-body PET/MRI: evaluation with PET/CT data. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:520–6. doi:10.2967/jnumed.108.054726.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wiesmuller M, Quick HH, Navalpakkam B, Lell MM, Uder M, Ritt P, et al. Comparison of lesion detection and quantitation of tracer uptake between PET from a simultaneously acquiring whole-body PET/MR hybrid scanner and PET from PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40:12–21. doi:10.1007/s00259-012-2249-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Finkelstein SE, Grigsby PW, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F, Moley JF, Hall BL. Combined [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for detection of recurrent, 131I-negative thyroid cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:286–92. doi:10.1245/s10434-007-9611-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Loeffelbein DJ, Souvatzoglou M, Wankerl V, Martinez-Moller A, Dinges J, Schwaiger M, et al. PET-MRI fusion in head-and-neck oncology: current status and implications for hybrid PET/MRI. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70:473–83. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu Z, Xun X, Wang Y, Mei L, He L, Zeng W, et al. MRI and ultrasonography detection of cervical lymph node metastases in differentiated thyroid carcinoma before reoperation. Am J Transl Res. 2014;6:147–54.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen Q, Raghavan P, Mukherjee S, Jameson MJ, Patrie J, Xin W, et al. Accuracy of MRI for the diagnosis of metastatic cervical lymphadenopathy in patients with thyroid cancer. Radiol Med. 2015;120(10):959–66. doi:10.1007/s11547-014-0474-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kuhn FP, Hullner M, Mader CE, Kastrinidis N, Huber GF, von Schulthess GK, et al. Contrast-enhanced PET/MR imaging versus contrast-enhanced PET/CT in head and neck cancer: how much MR information is needed? J Nucl Med. 2014;55:551–8. doi:10.2967/jnumed.113.125443.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Queiroz MA, Hullner M, Kuhn F, Huber G, Meerwein C, Kollias S, et al. PET/MRI and PET/CT in follow-up of head and neck cancer patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:1066–75. doi:10.1007/s00259-014-2707-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nagarajah J, Jentzen W, Hartung V, Rosenbaum-Krumme S, Mikat C, Heusner TA, et al. Diagnosis and dosimetry in differentiated thyroid carcinoma using 124I PET: comparison of PET/MRI vs PET/CT of the neck. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:1862–8. doi:10.1007/s00259-011-1866-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Seiboth L, Van Nostrand D, Wartofsky L, Ousman Y, Jonklaas J, Butler C, et al. Utility of PET/neck MRI digital fusion images in the management of recurrent or persistent thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2008;18:103–11. doi:10.1089/thy.2007.0135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jentzen W, Freudenberg L, Bockisch A. Quantitative imaging of (124)I with PET/ CT in pretherapy lesion dosimetry. Effects impairing image quantification and their corrections. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;55:21–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Binse.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the principles of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not describe any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Binse, I., Poeppel, T.D., Ruhlmann, M. et al. Imaging with 124I in differentiated thyroid carcinoma: is PET/MRI superior to PET/CT?. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 43, 1011–1017 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-015-3288-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-015-3288-y

Keywords

Navigation