Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of fluoroscopic injection location on immediate and delayed pain relief in patients with greater trochanteric pain syndrome

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Object

The purpose of this study was to assess whether fluoroscopically guided corticosteroid injections into the extrabursal tissues, trochanteric (subgluteus maximus) bursa, or subgluteus medius bursa provide better immediate and short-term pain relief.

Materials and methods

All fluoroscopically guided corticosteroid injections performed over a 67-month period for greater trochanteric pain syndrome were retrospectively reviewed. Procedural images were reviewed by two musculoskeletal radiologists to determine the dominant injection site based on final needle positioning and contrast spread pattern, with discrepancies resolved by consensus. Statistical analysis of the association between pain score reduction and dominant injection site was performed.

Results

One hundred forty injections in 121 patients met the inclusion criteria. The immediate and 1-week post-injection pain reduction was statistically significant for trochanteric bursa, subgluteus medius bursa, and non-bursal injections. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the degree of pain reduction between the groups. There was statistically significant increase in the 1-week post-injection mean pain score compared with immediate post-injection mean pain score in the subgluteus medius bursa and non-bursal injection groups (p < 0.01) but not in the trochanteric bursa group.

Conclusion

Fluoroscopy is frequently chosen over blind injection or ultrasound guidance for trochanteric steroid injections in patients with a high body mass index. Our results indicate that fluoroscopically guided steroid injections into the trochanteric bursa and subgluteus medius bursa significantly reduced immediate and 1-week post-injection pain scores, as do non-bursal injections. Steroid injection into the subgluteus medius bursa and non-bursal sites may be less effective in maintaining pain reduction at 1-week post-injection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mallow M, Nazarian LN. Greater trochanteric pain syndrome diagnosis and treatment. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. Elsevier Inc; 2014;25:279–289.

  2. Segal NA, Felson DT, Torner JC, Zhu Y, Curtis JR, Niu J, et al. Greater trochanteric pain syndrome: epidemiology and associated factors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:988–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Williams BS, Cohen SP. Greater trochanteric pain syndrome: a review of anatomy, diagnosis and treatment. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:1662–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tortolani PJ, Carbone JJ, Quartararo LG. Greater trochanteric pain syndrome in patients referred to orthopedic spine specialists. Spine J. 2002;2:251–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Blankenbaker DG, Ullrick SR, Davis KW, De Smet AA, Haaland B, Fine JP. Correlation of MRI findings with clinical findings of trochanteric pain syndrome. Skelet Radiol. 2008;37:903–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dwek J, Pfirrmann C, Stanley A, Pathria M, Chung CB. MR imaging of the hip abductors: normal anatomy and commonly encountered pathology at the greater trochanter. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2005;13:691–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Silva F, Adams T, Feinstein J, Arroyo RA. Trochanteric bursitis: refuting the myth of inflammation. J Clin Rheumatol. 2008;14:82–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Long SS, Surrey DE, Nazarian LN. Sonography of greater trochanteric pain syndrome and the rarity of primary bursitis. Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201:1083–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brinks A, van Rijn RM, Willemsen SP, Bohnen AM, Verhaar JAN, Koes BW, et al. Corticosteroid injections for greater trochanteric pain syndrome: a randomized controlled trial in primary care. Ann Fam Med. 2011;9:226–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bianchi S, Martinoli C. Ultrasound of the musculoskeletal system. Baert A, Knauth M, Sartor K, editor. Berlin: Springer; 2007.

  11. Cohen SP, Narvaez JC, Lebovits AH, Stojanovic MP. Corticosteroid injections for trochanteric bursitis: is fluoroscopy necessary? A pilot study. Br J Anaesth British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2005;94:100–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mu A, Peng P, Agur A. Landmark-guided and ultrasound-guided approaches for trochanteric bursa injection: a cadaveric study. Anesth Analg. 2017;124:966–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cohen SP, Strassels SA, Foster L, Marvel J, Williams K, Crooks M, et al. Comparison of fluoroscopically guided and blind corticosteroid injections for greater trochanteric pain syndrome: multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2009;338:986–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoffmann A, Pfirrmann CWA. The hip abductors at MR imaging. Eur J Radiol Elsevier Ireland Ltd. 2012;81:3755–62.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pfirrmann CW, Chung CB, Theumann NH, Trudell DJ, Resnick D. Greater trochanter of the hip: attachment of the abductor mechanism and a complex of three bursae--MR imaging and MR bursography in cadavers and MR imaging in asymptomatic volunteers. Radiology. 2001;221:469–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. McEvoy JR, Lee KS, Blankenbaker DG, Del Rio AM, Keene JS. Ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injections for treatment of greater trochanteric pain syndrome: greater trochanter bursa versus subgluteus medius bursa. Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201:313–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Labrosse JM, Cardinal É, Leduc BE, Duranceau J, Rémillard J, Bureau NJ, et al. Effectiveness of ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection for the treatment of gluteus medius tendinopathy. Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:202–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mitchell WG, Kettwich SC, Sibbitt WL, Sibbitt RR, Muruganandam M, Rolle NA, et al. Outcomes and cost-effectiveness of ultrasound-guided injection of the trochanteric bursa. Rheumatol Int. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2018;38:393–401.

  19. McWhorter J, Francis R, Heckmann R. Influence of local steroid injections on traumatized tendon properties. A biomechanical and histological study. Am J Sport Med. 1991;19:435–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kennedy J, Willis R. The effects of local steroid injections on tendons: a biomechanical and microscopic correlative study. Am J Sport Med. 1976;4:11–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lu H, Yang H, Shen H, Ye G, Lin XJ. The clinical effect of tendon repair for tendon spontaneous rupture after corticosteroid injection in hands: a retrospective observational study. Med (United States). 2016;95.

  22. Nichols AW. Complications associated with the use of corticosteroids in the treatment of athletic injuries. Clin J Sport Med. 2005;15:370–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Coombes BK, Bisset L, Vicenzino B. Efficacy and safety of corticosteroid injections and other injections for management of tendinopathy: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 2010;376:1751–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas C. Nacey.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mao, L.J., Crudup, J.B., Quirk, C.R. et al. Impact of fluoroscopic injection location on immediate and delayed pain relief in patients with greater trochanteric pain syndrome. Skeletal Radiol 49, 1547–1554 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-020-03451-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-020-03451-7

Keywords

Navigation