Abstract
Objective
The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of nuclear imaging modalities in the detection of aseptic loosening of total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
Materials and methods
MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched from database inception to December 2018 in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Included studies compared the results of a single imaging modality against an appropriate reference standard of prosthetic TKA loosening, with sufficient information to determine either sensitivity and/or specificity. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool.
Results
The search strategy identified 572 abstracts. Of these, 12 studies comprising 401 patients across four modalities (bone scintigraphy, 18F-FDG-PET, SPECT/CT arthrogram, radionuclide arthrogram) met the inclusion criteria. All included studies used operative findings, a period of clinical or radiographic observation or both as a reference standard for aseptic loosening. Sixteen comparisons with the reference standards were extracted. All studies were at risk of bias across patient selection, the index test, reference standard, and flow and timing of patients. The most accurate test for diagnosis of aseptic loosening in TKA was SPECT/CT arthrography demonstrated by the summary receiver operating characteristic curve.
Conclusions
The best available evidence suggests the most accurate modality for the detection of aseptic loosening in TKA is SPECT/CT arthrography. However, the available evidence has a high risk of bias, and total number of patients studied for each modality is small so further studies are warranted.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ethgen O, Bruyère O, Richy F, Dardennes C, Reginster J-Y. Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty: a qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004;86(5):963–74.
Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). Hip, Knee & Shoulder Arthroplasty: 2018 Annual Report. Adelaide: AOA.
Broughton N, Collopy D, Solomon M. Arthroplasty Society of Australia position statement on follow-up of joint replacement patients. Australian Orthopaedic Association; 2016.
Abu-Amer Y, Darwech I, Clohisy JC. Aseptic loosening of total joint replacements: mechanisms underlying osteolysis and potential therapies. Arthritis Res Ther. 2007;9(Suppl 1):S6.
Mandalia V, Eyres K, Schranz P, Toms A. Evaluation of patients with a painful total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2008;90(3):265–71.
Hirschmann MT, Konala P, Iranpour F, Kerner A, Rasch H, Friederich NF. Clinical value of SPECT/CT for evaluation of patients with painful knees after total knee arthroplasty—a new dimension of diagnostics? BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12(36).
Dennis DA. Evaluation of painful total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2004;19(4 (Suppl 1)):35–40.
Reinartz P. FDG-PET in patients with painful hip and knee arthroplasty: technical breakthrough or more of the same. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;53(1):41–50.
Love C, Marwin SE, Palestro CJ. Nuclear medicine and the infected joint replacement. Semin Nucl Med. 2009;39:66–78:66-78.
Palestro C. Nuclear medicine and the failed joint replacement: past, present, and future. World J Radiol. 2014;6(7):446–58.
Sneag DB, Bogner EA, Potter HG. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the painful total knee arthroplasty. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2015;19:40–8.
Solomon L, Stamenkov R, MacDonald A, Yaikwavong N, Neale S, Moss M, et al. Imaging peri-prosthetic osteolysis around total knee arthroplasties using a human cadaver model. J Arthroplast. 2012;27(6):1069–74.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D, The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.
de Vet H, Eisinga A, Riphagen I, Aertgeerts B, Pewsner D. Chapter 7: searching for Studies. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Version 04: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2008.
Devilléa WLJM, Bezemera PD, Bouter LM. Publications on diagnostic test evaluation in family medicine journals: an optimal search strategy. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53:65–9.
Jones CM, Athanasiou T. Summary receiver operating characteristic curve analysis techniques in the evaluation of diagnostic tests. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:16–20.
Macaskill P, Gatsonis C, Deeks J, Harbord R, Takwoingi Y. Chapter 10: analysing and presenting results. In: Deeks J, Bossuyt P, Gatsonis C, eds. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy version 10: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2010.
Whiting P, Rutjes A, Westwood M, Mallett S, Deeks J, Reitsma J, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(8):529–36.
Zweig M, Campbell G. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem. 1993;39(4):561–77.
Abele JT, Swami VG, Russell G, Masson ECO, Flemming JP. The accuracy of single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography arthrography in evaluating aseptic loosening of hip and knee prostheses. J Arthroplast. 2015;30:1647–51.
Chew CG, Lewis P, Middleton F, Wijngaard R, Deshaies A. Radionuclide arthrogram with SPECT/CT for the evaluation of mechanical loosening of hip and knee prostheses. Ann Nucl Med. 2010;24:735–43.
Claassen L, Ettinger M, Plaass C, Daniilidis K, Calliess T, Ezechieli M. Diagnostic value of bone scintigraphy for aseptic loosening after total knee arthroplasty. Technol Health Care. 2014;22:767–73.
Kitchener MI, Coats E, Keene G, Paterson R. Assessment of radionuclide arthrography in the evaluation of loosening of knee prostheses. Knee. 2006;13:220–5.
Mandegaran R, Agrawal K, Vijayanathan S, Gnanasegaran G. The value of 99mTc-MDP bone SPECT/CT in evaluation of patients with painful knee prosthesis. Nucl Med Commun. 2018;39:397–404.
Manthey N, Reinhard P, Moog F, Knesewitsch P, Hahn K, Tatsch K. The use of [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to differentiate between synovitis, loosening and infection of hip and knee prostheses. Nucl Med Commun. 2002;23:645–53.
Mayer-Wagner S, Mayer W, Maegerlein S, Linke R, Jansson V, Müller PE. Use of 18F-FDG-PET in the diagnosis of endoprosthetic loosening of knee and hip implants. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010;130:1231–8.
Sacchetti G, Ghisellini F, Brambilla M, Consoli AD, Fornara P, Rizzo E, et al. Quantitative Scintigraphic evaluation of total knee arthroplasties: a feasibility study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;325:181–9.
Smith SL, Wastie ML, Forster I. Radionuclide bone scintigraphy in the detection of significant complications after total knee joint replacement. Clin Radiol. 2001;56:221–4.
Sterner T, Pink R, Freudenberg L, Jentzen T, Quitmann H, Bockisch A, et al. The role of [18F] fluoride positron emission tomography in the early detection of aseptic loosening of total knee arthroplasty. Int J Surg. 2007;5:99–104.
Verlooy H, Victor J, Renson L, Vandecruys A, Drent P, Mortelmans L, et al. Limitations of quantitative radionuclide bone scanning in the evaluation of total knee replacement. Clin Nucl Med. 1993;18(8):671–4.
Marx A, Saxler G, Landgraeber S, Löer F, Holland-Letz T, Mv K. Comparison of subtraction arthrography, radionuclide arthrography and conventional plain radiography to assess loosening of total knee arthroplasty. Biomed Tech. 2005;50:143–7.
Jaroma A, Suomalainen J-S, Niemitukia L, Soininvaara T, Salo J, Kröger H. Imaging of symptomatic total knee arthroplasty with cone beam computed tomography. Acta Radiol. 2018;59(12):1500–7.
Verberne S, Sonnega R, Temmerman O, Raijmakers P. What is the accuracy of nuclear imaging in the assessment of periprosthetic knee infection? A meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475(5):1395–410.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 13 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barnsley, L., Barnsley, L. Detection of aseptic loosening in total knee replacements: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Skeletal Radiol 48, 1565–1572 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-019-03215-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-019-03215-y