Skip to main content
Log in

Improving groundwater-flow modeling using optimal zoning methods

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Environmental Geology

Abstract

Hydraulic conductivity sometimes exhibits complicated spatial variation over a site. A thorough understanding of the spatial distributions of hydraulic conductivity helps to make deterministic models of groundwater more accurate. This study presents a novel procedure that combines simulated annealing algorithms (SA) and the shortest distance method (SD) with the modular three-dimensional groundwater flow model (MODFLOW). The procedure is applied to a hypothetical site with groundwater-monitoring wells to minimize the difference between simulated and observed hydraulic head for optimal zoning of the spatial distribution of hydraulic conductivity. The results of this optimal zoning method indicate that this new procedure not only improves the efficiency of optimization, but also increases the probability of finding the global optimum, minimizing the errors of the hydraulic head simulated by MODFLOW in two scenarios, one with known and the other with unknown hydraulic conductivity. The results also illustrated that the procedure can effectively determine and delineate hydrogeological zones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5. a
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8. a
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10. a
Fig. 11. a
Fig. 12. a
Fig. 13.
Fig. 14.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdulla FA, Al-Khatib MA, Al-Ghazzawi ZD (2000) Development of groundwater modeling for the AZROQ basin. Environ Geol 40(1/2):11–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Detwiler RL, Mehl S, Rajaram H, Cheung WW (2002) Comparison of an algebraic multigrid algorithm to two iterative solvers used for modeling ground water flow and transport. Ground Water 40(3):267–272

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch CV, Journel AG (1992) Geostatistical software library and user's guide. Oxford University Press, New York

  • Dougherty DE, Marryott RA (1991) Optimal groundwater management: 1. simulated annealing. Water Resour Res 27(10):2493–2508

    Google Scholar 

  • Ella VB, Melvin SW, Kanwar RS, Jones LC, Horton R (2002) Inverse three-dimensional groundwater modeling using the finite-difference method for recharge estimation in a glacial till aquitard. Trans Am Soc Agric Eng 45(3):703–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman L, Rousseeuw PJ (1990) Finding groups in data. Wiley, New York

  • Kirkpatrick S (1984) Optimization by simulated annealing: quantitative studies. J Statistic Phys 34(5/6):975–986

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD, Vecchi MP (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220:671–680

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin YP, Chang TK, Teng TP (2001a) Characterization soil lead by comparing of sequential Gaussian simulation, simulated annealing simulation and kriging methods. Environ Geol 41(1/2):189–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin YP, Tan YC, Rouhani S (2001b) Identifying spatial characteristics of transmissivity using simulated annealing and kriging methods. Environ Geol 41:200–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majumdar PK, Ghosh NC, Chakravorty B (2002) Analysis of arsenic-contaminated groundwater domain in the Nadia district of West Bengal (India). Hydrol Sci, J Sci Hydrol 47:S55–S66

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald MG, Harbaugh AW (1988) A modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model. Techniques of Water Resources Investigations, 06-A1. US Geological Survey

  • Metropolis N, Rosenbluth A, Rosenbluth M, Teller A, Teller E, Chem J (1953) Equation of state calculations by fast computation machines. Physics 21:1087–1092

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mikake S, Yoshida H, Koide K, Yanagizawa K, Ogata N, Maekawa K (2000) Methodology development for modeling heterogeneous conductivity fields for a sandstone type uranium deposit, central Japan. Eng Geol 56:185–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth C, Chiles JP, De Fouquet C (1998) Combing geostatistics and flow simulators to identify transmissivity. Adv Water Resour 21(7):555–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sophocleous MA, Koelliker JK, Govindaraju RS, Birdie T, Ramireddygari SR, Perkins SP (1999) Integrated numerical modeling for basin-wide water management: the case of the Rattlesnake Creek basin in south-central Kansas. J Hydrol 214:179–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tung CP, Chou CA (2002) Application of tabu search to groundwater parameter zonation. J Am Water Resour Assoc 38(4):1115–1126

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang PP, Zheng C (1998) An efficient approach for successively perturbed groundwater models. Adv Water Resour 21:499–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen XH, Capilla JE, Deutsch CV, Gomez-Hernandez JJ, Cullick AS (1999) A program to create permeability fields that honor single-phase flow rate and pressure data. Comput Geosci 25:217–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wingle WL, Poeter EP, McKenna SA (1999) UNCERT: geostatistics, uncertainty analysis and visualization software applied to groundwater flow and contaminant transport modeling. Comput Geosci 25:365–376

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu-Pin Lin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tung, CP., Tang, CC. & Lin, YP. Improving groundwater-flow modeling using optimal zoning methods. Env Geol 44, 627–638 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-003-0822-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-003-0822-1

Keywords

Navigation