Skip to main content
Log in

After-hours radiology coverage in children’s hospitals: a multi-center survey

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although the provision of pediatric emergency and trauma radiology has become increasingly prevalent in North America over the last few years, many hospitals differ in their models of providing after-hours coverage.

Objective

To describe the scope of after-hours radiology services provided in children’s hospitals in North America, and the means by which different radiology departments deliver this coverage.

Materials and methods

The Society for Pediatric Radiology Emergency and Trauma Imaging Committee developed a survey that we electronically distributed to a single representative from each of the 79 hospitals represented in the Society of Chiefs of Radiology at Children’s Hospitals (SCORCH).

Results

Completed questionnaires were submitted between Aug. 2, 2017, and Sept. 29, 2017, by 44/79 (56%) SCORCH representatives. Contemporaneous after-hours interpretation of radiographs (81%), ultrasounds (81%), body CT (79%) and neurologic CT (75%) with preliminary or final reports was common. Coverage was accomplished most commonly by a combination of evening and overnight shifts 17/44 (39%). Eleven of 44 (25%) hospitals used a model in which radiologists rotate working blocks of overnight service followed by blocks off service. Only 2/44 (5%) hospitals exclusively provided pager coverage after hours. Attending pediatric radiologists were assigned to the majority of after-hours shifts 110/175 (63%), but radiology trainees provided interpretations independently for varying periods of time at 19/44 (43%) surveyed hospitals. Incentives to work after hours included the option to work remotely, as well as additional income, time off, and academic time.

Conclusion

The model for delivering after-hours pediatric radiology coverage varies. Most hospitals, however, provide contemporaneous interpretations of radiographs, US, body CT and neurologic CT. Most institutions use evening shifts to extend coverage later, with many providing subsequent overnight coverage. Although most shifts are staffed by attending pediatric radiologists, radiology trainees commonly interpret studies independently for varying durations of time after hours.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Coleman S, Holalkere NS, Doherty G et al (2016) Radiology 24/7 in-house attending coverage: do benefits outweigh cost? Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 45:241–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Towbin AJ, Iyer SB, Brown J et al (2013) Practice policy and quality initiatives: decreasing variability in turnaround time for radiographic studies from the emergency department. Radiographics 33:361–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sellers A, Hillman BJ, Wintermark M (2014) Survey of after-hours coverage of emergency department imaging studies by U.S. academic radiology departments. J Am Coll Radiol 11:725–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Donaldson JS, Thakrar KH (2017) 24/7 pediatric radiology attending coverage: times are changing. Pediatr Radiol 47:803–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Markowitz RI, Meyer JS, Hegman JA, Fellows KE (1998) The impact of extended radiology attending coverage in a children's hospital. Pediatr Radiol 28:167–170

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Aquino M, Koberlein G (2017) After-hours pediatric radiology coverage at Cincinnati Children’s hospital medical center. Pediatr Radiol 47:S228

    Google Scholar 

  7. SurveyMonkey (2020) Survey engine. www.surveymonkey.com. Accessed 27 Jan 2020

  8. Walter RS (1995) Radiology practices in emergency departments associated with pediatric residency training programs. Pediatr Emerg Care 11:78–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Isaacman DJ, Davis HW (1993) Pediatric emergency medicine: state of the art. Pediatrics 91:587–590

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Guimaraes CV, Leach JL, Jones BV (2011) Trainee misinterpretations on pediatric neuroimaging studies: classification, imaging analysis, and outcome assessment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32:1591–1599

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Halsted MJ, Kumar H, Paquin JJ et al (2004) Diagnostic errors by radiology residents in interpreting pediatric radiographs in an emergency setting. Pediatr Radiol 34:331–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Collins J, Gruppen LD, Bailey JE et al (2014) 24/7/365 in-house radiologist coverage: effect on resident education. Acad Radiol 21:842–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. England E, Collins J, White RD et al (2015) Radiology report turnaround time: effect on resident education. Acad Radiol 22:662–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael R. Aquino.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aquino, M.R., Maresky, H.S., Amirabadi, A. et al. After-hours radiology coverage in children’s hospitals: a multi-center survey. Pediatr Radiol 50, 907–912 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-020-04647-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-020-04647-8

Keywords

Navigation