Skip to main content
Log in

Low b-value (50–100) diffusion-weighted images detect significantly more hyperintense liver lesions in children than T2-weighted images

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Low b-value (50–100 s/mm2) diffusion-weighted images (low b-value DWI) have been shown to be superior to T2-weighted fast spin echo sequence (T2-W) in detecting liver lesions in adults. There are no such studies assessing this difference in children.

Objective

The purpose of the study was to compare the sensitivity of low b-value DWI images and T2-W images in detecting focal liver lesions in children.

Materials and methods

A retrospective review of liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to assess focal liver lesions in 50 children (22 males, 28 females; age: 2 months to 17 years [mean: 10.9 years]) was performed. Two radiologists reviewed both low b-value DWI and T2-W sequences independently on different occasions to note lesions, the smallest lesion size and the location. A consensus reading of the entire MRI examination and a correlation with follow-up, other imaging modalities and pathology in available cases were used to determine the final number of lesions as a reference standard. The average number of lesions per patient detected by both readers on each sequence was compared with each other and with the reference standard using the signed-rank test. The smallest lesions detected by each sequence were compared using the paired t-test.

Results

One hundred seventy hyperintense lesions were identified on consensus review to serve as the reference standard. The average number of lesions identified by both readers on low b-value DWI was 134 (79%) and on T2-W was 95 (56%). There was excellent interobserver agreement for detection of lesions on low b-value DWI (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]=0.96 [0.93–0.98]) and T2-W (ICC=0.85 [0.75–0.91]), with slightly better agreement on low b-value DWI. Both readers identified significantly more number of lesions on low b-value DWI compared to T2-W (Reader 1: P=0.0036, Reader 2: P=0.0001). Compared to the reference standard (mean number of lesions: 3.45), T2-W detected significantly fewer lesions (mean number of lesions: 1.91; P=0.0001) while there was no significant difference in lesion detection on low b-value DWI (mean number of lesions: 2.68; P=0.1527). Low b-value DWI and T2-W were not significantly different in identifying the smallest lesion size (Reader 1: P=0.19, Reader 2: P=0.47).

Conclusion

Low b-value DWI images are more sensitive than T2-W sequences in detecting hyperintense focal liver lesions in children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chavhan GB, Alsabban Z, Babyn PS (2014) Diffusion-weighted imaging in pediatric body MR imaging: principles, technique, and emerging applications. Radiographics 34:E73–E88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Alqatie A, Mann E, Moineddin R et al (2015) Solitary liver lesions in children: interobserver agreement and accuracy of MRI diagnosis. Clin Imaging 39:442–448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Parikh T, Drew SJ, Lee VS et al (2008) Focal liver lesion detection and characterization with diffusion-weighted MR imaging: comparison with standard breath-hold T2-weighted imaging. Radiology 246:812–822

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Soyer P, Boudiaf M, Placé V et al (2011) Preoperative detection of hepatic metastases: comparison of diffusion-weighted, T2-weighted fast spin echo and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging using surgical and histopathologic findings as standard of reference. Eur J Radiol 80:245–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zech CJ, Herrmann KA, Dietrich O et al (2008) Black-blood diffusion-weighted EPI acquisition of the liver with parallel imaging: comparison with a standard T2-weighted sequence for detection of focal liver lesions. Investig Radiol 43:261–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bruegel M, Gaa J, Waldt S et al (2008) Diagnosis of hepatic metastasis: comparison of respiration-triggered diffusion-weighted echo-planar MRI and five t2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequences. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:1421–1429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang DM, Jahng GH, Kim HC et al (2011) The detection and discrimination of malignant and benign focal hepatic lesions: T2 weighted vs diffusion-weighted MRI. Br J Radiol 84:319–326

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. d'Assignies G, Fina P, Bruno O et al (2013) High sensitivity of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for the detection of liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumors: comparison with T2-weighted and dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 268:390–399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chavhan GB, Shelmerdine S, Jhaveri K, Babyn PS (2016) Liver MR imaging in children: current concepts and technique. Radiographics 36:1517–1532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chavhan GB, Caro-Dominguez P (2016) Diffusion-weighted imaging in pediatric body magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr Radiol 46:847–857

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Govind B. Chavhan.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grasparil, A.D., Gupta, H., Sheybani, E. et al. Low b-value (50–100) diffusion-weighted images detect significantly more hyperintense liver lesions in children than T2-weighted images. Pediatr Radiol 49, 1299–1305 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04455-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04455-9

Keywords

Navigation