Skip to main content
Log in

Transseptal Puncture for Catheter Ablation in Children

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Transseptal puncture (TP) is used in pediatric patients to access the left atrium in left-sided arrhythmia catheter ablation. Performing this procedure can be difficult and risky, especially in small children. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of TPs in children ≤ 30 kg. Between April 2012 and April 2018, a retrospective evaluation was conducted of the clinical features, procedural outcomes, and follow-ups of ≤ 30 kg pediatric patients who required TPs for left-sided ablations at a pediatric electrophysiology center in which a three-dimensional mapping system was routinely used. A total of 45 pediatric patients who were ≤ 30 kg, underwent TPs: 10 patients ≤ 20 kg (Group 1) and 35 patients > 20 kg and ≤ 30 kg (Group 2). The TP success rate was 97.8%. The median procedure and fluoroscopy times were 120 min and 5.43 min, respectively. One patient developed self-limited pericardial effusion during the procedure; however, there were no incidences of cardiac tamponade. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the procedure time and fluoroscopy time, and pericardial effusion was only observed in Group 2. TPs are safe and feasible in small children. These procedures can be performed with low complication rates in children weighing ≤ 30 kg.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brugada J, Blom N, Sarquella-Brugada G, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Deanfield J, Janousek J, Abrams D et al (2013) European Heart Rhythm Association; Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapy for arrhythmias in the pediatric population: EHRA and AEPC-Arrhythmia Working Group joint consensus statement. Europace 15:1337–1382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kubus P, Vıt P, Gebauer RA, Zaoral L, Peichl P, Fiala M, Janoušek J (2014) Long-term results of paediatric radiofrequency catheter ablation: a population-based study. Europace 16:1808–1813

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hiippala A, Happonen JM (2015) Population-based single-center outcome for pediatric catheter ablation of common supraventricular tachycardias. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 38:115–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Anselmino M, Matta M, Saglietto A, Calò L, Giustetto C, Scaglione M, Gaita F (2018) Transseptal or retrograde approach for transcatheter ablation of left sided accessory pathways: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol 272:202–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Roelke M, Smith AJ, Palacios IF (1994) The technique and safety of transseptal left heart catheterization: the Massachusetts General Hospital experience with 1,279 procedures. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 32:332–339

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. De Ponti R, Cappato R, Curnis A, Della Bella P, Padeletti L, Raviele A, Santini M et al (2006) Trans-septal catheterization in the electrophysiology laboratory: data from a multicenter survey spanning 12 years. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:1037–1042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bowers MR, O’Neill PG, Bhaskar R, Aryana A (2018) Three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping to guide transseptal catheterization HeartRhythm. Case Rep 6:219–221

    Google Scholar 

  8. An HS, Choi EY, Kwon BS, Kim GB, Bae EJ, Noh CI, Choi JY (2013) Radiofrequency catheter ablation for supraventricular tachycardia: a comparison study of children aged 0–4 and 5–9 years. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 36:1488–1494

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Backhoff D, Klehs S, Müller MJ, Schneider H, Kriebel T, Paul T, Krause U (2016) Radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular pathways in infants and toddlers ≤ 15 kg. Pediatr Cardiol 37:892–898

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Friedman RA, Walsh EP, Silka MJ, Calkins H, Stevenson WG, Rhodes LA, Deal BJ et al (2002) NASPE Expert Consensus Conference: radiofrequency catheter ablation in children with and without congenital heart disease. Report of the writing committee. North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 25:1000–1017

    Google Scholar 

  11. von Alvensleben JC, Dick M II, Bradley DJ, LaPage MJ (2014) Transseptal access in pediatric and congenital electrophysiology procedures: defining risk. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 41:273–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lesh MD, Van Hare GF, Scheinman MM, Ports TA, Epstein LA (1993) Comparison of the retrograde and transseptal methods for ablation of left free wall accessory pathways. J Am Coll Cardiol 22:542–549

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Calkins H, Langberg J, Sousa J, el-Atassi R, Leon A, Kou W, Kalbfleisch S et al (1992) Radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular connections in 250 patients: abbreviated therapeutic approach to Wolff-Parkinson-White. Circulation 85:1337–1346

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hashem S, Choudhury AK, Paul GK, Rahman MZ (2015) Comparison between retrograde and transeptal approach in radiofrequency catheter ablation of left accessory pathways. Mymensingh Med J 24:94–102

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Law IH, Fischbach PS, LeRoy S, Lloyd TR, Rocchini AP, Dick M (2001) Access to the left atrium for delivery of radiofrequency ablation in young patients: retrograde aortic vs transseptal approach. Pediatr Cardiol 22:204–209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bashore TM, Bates ER, Berger PB, Clark DA, Cusma JT, Dehmer GJ, Kern MJ et al (2011) American College of Cardiology. Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. American College of Cardiology/Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions Clinical Expert Consensus Document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards. A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:2170–2214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Venneri L, Rossi F, Botto N, Andreassi MG, Salcone N, Emad A, Lazzeri M et al (2009) Cancer risk from professional exposure in staff working in cardiac catheterization laboratory: insights from the National Research Council’s Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation VII Report. Am Heart J 157:118–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Efstathopoulos EP, Katritsis DG, Kottou S, Kalivas N, Tzanalaridou E, Giazitzoglou E, Korovesis S et al (2006) Patient and staff radiation dosimetry during cardiac electrophysiology studies and catheter ablation procedures: a comprehensive analysis. Europace 8:443–448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yoshida S, Suzuki T, Yoshida Y, Watanabe S, Nakamura K, Sasaki T, Kawasaki Y et al (2016) Feasibility and safety of transseptal puncture procedures for radiofrequency catheter ablation in small children weighing below 30 kg: single-centre experience. Europace 18:1581–1586

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. McCauley MD, Patel N, Greenberg SJ, Molina-Razavi JE, Safavi-Naeini P, Razavi M (2016) Fluoroscopy-free atrial transseptal puncture. Eur J Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2:57

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Clark J, Bockoven JR, Lane J, Patel CR, Smith G (2008) Use of three-dimensional catheter guidance and trans-esophageal echocardiography to eliminate fluoroscopy in catheter ablation of left-sided accessory pathways. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 31:283–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gaita F, Caponi D, Pianelli M, Scaglione M, Toso E, Cesarani F, Boffano C et al (2010) Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a cause of silent thromboembolism? Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of cerebral thromboembolism in patients undergoing ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circulation 122:1667–1673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Serhat Koca.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from the children’s parents/guardians.

Research Involving with Human and Animal Participants

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koca, S., Akdeniz, C. & Tuzcu, V. Transseptal Puncture for Catheter Ablation in Children. Pediatr Cardiol 40, 799–804 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-019-02069-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-019-02069-4

Keywords

Navigation