Skip to main content
Log in

Stone-event-free survival after ureteroscopic lithotripsy by age: comparison between young and older patients

  • Research
  • Published:
Urolithiasis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine stone-event-free survival after ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL) and risk factors for stone events by age. We retrospectively collected data of all URSL cases at our institution from 2008 to 2021. A total of 1334 cases were included and divided into young (< 65 years, 792 cases), young-old (65–74 years, 316 cases), old-old (75–84 years, 172 cases), and oldest-old (≥ 85 years, 54 cases) groups. Patient characteristics, surgical outcomes, and postoperative stone events were evaluated. The stone-event-free survival and risk factors were compared between young and older groups. Overall, 214 (16.0%) cases developed stone events during a mean follow-up period of 763 days and the 2-year, 5-year, and 8-year stone-event-free survival rates were 84.5%, 72.2%, and 57.2%, respectively. The numbers of stone events in young, young-old, old-old, oldest-old groups were 133 (16.8%), 53 (16.8%), 21 (12.2%), and 7 (13.0%), respectively. No significant differences were found in stone-event-free survival between the young group and each of the older groups. Residual fragment > 4 mm and stone burden ≥ 15 mm were common risk factors in both young and older groups. Especially in older patients, preoperative stenting, which was most often performed to treat obstructive pyelonephritis, was the third risk factor. In conclusion, stone-event-free survival after URSL was comparable between young and older patients. Residual fragment > 4 mm and stone burden ≥ 15 mm were common risk factors in both groups. Preoperative stenting was an additional risk factor in older patients, suggesting that urinary tract infection may influence stone events.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Population reference bureau (2018) 2018 World population data sheet focus on changing age structures. Available from: https://www.prb.org/2018-world-population-data-sheet-with-focus-on-changing-age-structures/.

  2. Cabinet office, government of Japan (2018) Annual report on the ageing society: 2018. Available from: https://www8.cao.go.jp/kourei/english/ annualreport/2018/pdf/c1–1.pdf

  3. Sakamoto S, Miyazawa K, Yasui T et al (2018) Chronological changes in the epidemiological characteristics of upper urinary tract urolithiasis in Japan. Int J Urol 25:373–378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yamashita S, Kohjimoto Y, Hirabayashi Y et al (2017) Upper urinary tract stone disease in patients with poor performance status: active stone removal or conservative management? BMC Urol 17:103

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Waseda Y, Takazawa R, Kobayashi M et al (2020) Successful outcomes of endoscopic lithotripsy in completely bedridden patients with symptomatic urinary calculi. Sci Rep 10:8839

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Taguchi M, Kinoshita H, Anada N et al (2022) Effectiveness and safety of ureteroscopic lithotripsy in young, old-old, and oldest old patients. J Endourol 36:439–443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Emiliani E, Piccirilli A, Cepeda-Delgado M et al (2021) Flexible ureteroscopy in extreme elderly patients (80 years of age and older) is feasible and safe. World J Urol 39:2703–2708

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Prattley S, Voss J, Cheung S et al (2018) Ureteroscopy and stone treatment in the elderly (≥70 years): prospective outcomes over 5- years with a review of literature. Int Braz J Urol 44:750–757

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Berardinelli F, De Francesco P, Marchioni M et al (2017) RIRS in the elderly: is it feasible and safe? Int J Surg 42:147–151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Aykac A, Baran O (2020) Safety and efficacy of retrograde intrarenal surgery in geriatric patients by age groups. Int Urol Nephrol 52:2229–2236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Uchida Y, Takazawa R, Kitayama S et al (2018) Predictive risk factors for systemic inflammatory response syndrome following ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy. Urolithiasis 46:375–381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chew BH, Brotherhood HL, Sur RL et al (2016) Natural history, complications and re-intervention rates of asymptomatic residual stone fragments after ureteroscopy: a report from the EDGE research consortium. J Urol 195:982–986

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ito K, Takahashi T, Somiya S et al (2021) Predictors of repeat surgery and stone-related events after flexible ureteroscopy for renal stones. Urology 154:96–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Iremashvili V, Li S, Penniston KL et al (2019) Role of residual fragments on the risk of repeat surgery after flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy: single center study. J Urol 201:358–363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nevo A, Mano R, Baniel J et al (2017) Ureteric stent dwelling time: a risk factor for post-ureteroscopy sepsis. BJU Int 120:117–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and data collection were performed by all authors. The first draft of the manuscript was written by TT and RT. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryoji Takazawa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Ethical approval

The protocol for this research project has been approved by a suitably constituted Ethics Committee of Tokyo Metropolitan Ohtsuka Hospital (approval number 2020-62) and it conforms to the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all the participants and/or their surrogates.

Registry

Not applicable.

Animal studies

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tamiya, T., Takazawa, R., Uchida, Y. et al. Stone-event-free survival after ureteroscopic lithotripsy by age: comparison between young and older patients. Urolithiasis 51, 74 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-023-01449-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-023-01449-z

Keywords

Navigation