Abstract
The aim of this study is to examine stone-event-free survival after ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL) and risk factors for stone events by age. We retrospectively collected data of all URSL cases at our institution from 2008 to 2021. A total of 1334 cases were included and divided into young (< 65 years, 792 cases), young-old (65–74 years, 316 cases), old-old (75–84 years, 172 cases), and oldest-old (≥ 85 years, 54 cases) groups. Patient characteristics, surgical outcomes, and postoperative stone events were evaluated. The stone-event-free survival and risk factors were compared between young and older groups. Overall, 214 (16.0%) cases developed stone events during a mean follow-up period of 763 days and the 2-year, 5-year, and 8-year stone-event-free survival rates were 84.5%, 72.2%, and 57.2%, respectively. The numbers of stone events in young, young-old, old-old, oldest-old groups were 133 (16.8%), 53 (16.8%), 21 (12.2%), and 7 (13.0%), respectively. No significant differences were found in stone-event-free survival between the young group and each of the older groups. Residual fragment > 4 mm and stone burden ≥ 15 mm were common risk factors in both young and older groups. Especially in older patients, preoperative stenting, which was most often performed to treat obstructive pyelonephritis, was the third risk factor. In conclusion, stone-event-free survival after URSL was comparable between young and older patients. Residual fragment > 4 mm and stone burden ≥ 15 mm were common risk factors in both groups. Preoperative stenting was an additional risk factor in older patients, suggesting that urinary tract infection may influence stone events.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Population reference bureau (2018) 2018 World population data sheet focus on changing age structures. Available from: https://www.prb.org/2018-world-population-data-sheet-with-focus-on-changing-age-structures/.
Cabinet office, government of Japan (2018) Annual report on the ageing society: 2018. Available from: https://www8.cao.go.jp/kourei/english/ annualreport/2018/pdf/c1–1.pdf
Sakamoto S, Miyazawa K, Yasui T et al (2018) Chronological changes in the epidemiological characteristics of upper urinary tract urolithiasis in Japan. Int J Urol 25:373–378
Yamashita S, Kohjimoto Y, Hirabayashi Y et al (2017) Upper urinary tract stone disease in patients with poor performance status: active stone removal or conservative management? BMC Urol 17:103
Waseda Y, Takazawa R, Kobayashi M et al (2020) Successful outcomes of endoscopic lithotripsy in completely bedridden patients with symptomatic urinary calculi. Sci Rep 10:8839
Taguchi M, Kinoshita H, Anada N et al (2022) Effectiveness and safety of ureteroscopic lithotripsy in young, old-old, and oldest old patients. J Endourol 36:439–443
Emiliani E, Piccirilli A, Cepeda-Delgado M et al (2021) Flexible ureteroscopy in extreme elderly patients (80 years of age and older) is feasible and safe. World J Urol 39:2703–2708
Prattley S, Voss J, Cheung S et al (2018) Ureteroscopy and stone treatment in the elderly (≥70 years): prospective outcomes over 5- years with a review of literature. Int Braz J Urol 44:750–757
Berardinelli F, De Francesco P, Marchioni M et al (2017) RIRS in the elderly: is it feasible and safe? Int J Surg 42:147–151
Aykac A, Baran O (2020) Safety and efficacy of retrograde intrarenal surgery in geriatric patients by age groups. Int Urol Nephrol 52:2229–2236
Uchida Y, Takazawa R, Kitayama S et al (2018) Predictive risk factors for systemic inflammatory response syndrome following ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy. Urolithiasis 46:375–381
Chew BH, Brotherhood HL, Sur RL et al (2016) Natural history, complications and re-intervention rates of asymptomatic residual stone fragments after ureteroscopy: a report from the EDGE research consortium. J Urol 195:982–986
Ito K, Takahashi T, Somiya S et al (2021) Predictors of repeat surgery and stone-related events after flexible ureteroscopy for renal stones. Urology 154:96–102
Iremashvili V, Li S, Penniston KL et al (2019) Role of residual fragments on the risk of repeat surgery after flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy: single center study. J Urol 201:358–363
Nevo A, Mano R, Baniel J et al (2017) Ureteric stent dwelling time: a risk factor for post-ureteroscopy sepsis. BJU Int 120:117–122
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and data collection were performed by all authors. The first draft of the manuscript was written by TT and RT. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None declared.
Ethical approval
The protocol for this research project has been approved by a suitably constituted Ethics Committee of Tokyo Metropolitan Ohtsuka Hospital (approval number 2020-62) and it conforms to the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Informed consent
Written informed consent was obtained from all the participants and/or their surrogates.
Registry
Not applicable.
Animal studies
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Tamiya, T., Takazawa, R., Uchida, Y. et al. Stone-event-free survival after ureteroscopic lithotripsy by age: comparison between young and older patients. Urolithiasis 51, 74 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-023-01449-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-023-01449-z