Abstract
Background
Since the pioneering works of Malt and Komatsu and Tamai in the 1960s, thousands of replantations and revascularizations of the upper extremity have been performed worldwide. The advent of microsurgery allowed surgeons to replant or revascularize essentially any amputated part. However, the mechanism of injury or patient comorbidities are important factors that can affect the outcomes.
Methods
Patients submitted to upper extremity replantation or revascularization between 2014 and June 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic features, type of accident, mechanism of injury, amputation level, and success rate were examined.
Results
Over the 4.5-year period, 45 replantations and 20 revascularizations were performed. The vast majority of patients were male. The mean age was 45.7 years old in the replantation group and 49.2 years old in the revascularization group. In both groups, the crush/avulsion injury was the most common mechanism. The overall success rate was 57.8% in replantation and 75% in revascularization. The failure in the replantation group was mainly due to arterial insufficiency.
Conclusions
The success of revascularization is higher than replantation; however, the mechanism of injury seems to be a critical determinant of the outcome.
Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Malt RA, McKhann C (1964) Replantation of several arms. JAMA 189:716–722
Komatsu S, Tamai S (1968) Successful replantation of a complety cut-off thumb: case report. Plast Reconstr Surg 42:374–377
Soucacos PN, Beris AE, Touliatos AS, Korobilias AB, Gelalis J, Sakas G (1995) Complete versus incomplete nonviable amputations of the thumb: comparison of the survival rate and functional results. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 264:16–18
Boulas HJ (1998) Amputations of the fingers and hand: indications for replantation. J Am Acad Orthop Sur 6:100–105
Pederson WC (2001) Replantation. Plast Reconstr Sur 107:823–841
Cavadas PC (2008 Aug) Multilevel replantation of the palm and digits. Plast Reconstr Surg 122(2):95e–96e
Casal D, Gomez MM, Antunes P, Candeias H, Almeida MA (2013) Defying standard criteria for digital replantation: a case series. Int J Surg Case Rep 4:597–602
Neinstein RM, Dvali LT, Le S, Anastakis DJ (2012) Complete digital amputations undergoing replantation surgery: a 10-year retrospective study. Hand (N Y) 7:263–266
Fufa D, Calfee R, Wall L, Zeng W, Goldfarb C (2013) Digit replantation: experience of two U.S. academic level-I trauma centers. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:2127–2134
Oruç M et al (2017) Eight years of clinical experience with digit replantation: demographic characteristics and outcomes. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 23(4)
Yoshimura M (2003) Indications and limits of digital replantation. JMAJ 46:460–467
Waikakul S, Sakkarnkosol S, Vanadurongwan V, Unnanuntana A (2000) Results of 1018 digital replantations in 552 patients. Injury 31:33–40
Yu H, Wei L, Liang B, Hou S, Wang J, Yang Y (2015) Nonsurgical factors of digital replantation and survival rate: a metaanalysis. Indian J Orthop 49:265–271
Wei FC, Chang YL, Chen HC, Chuang CC (1988) Three successful digital replantations in a patient after 84, 86, and 94 hours of cold ischemia time. Plast Reconstr Surg 82:346–350
Cavadas PC, Rubí C, Thione A, Pérez-Espadero A (2018) Immediate versus overnight-delayed digital replantation: comparative retrospective cohort study of survival outcomes. J Hand Surg Am 43(7):625–630
Costa H et al (1991) One-staged coverage and revascularization of traumatized limbs by a flow-through radial mid-forearm free flap. Br J Plast Surg 44:533–537
Costa H, Cunha C, Conde A, Barsdley A, McGrouther DA (1997) The flow-through free flap in replantation surgery: a new concept. Eur J Plast Surg 20:181–185
Funding
No funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Tiago Guedes, Marta Azevedo, João Morais, Carolina Andresen, Gustavo Coelho, Horácio Zenha, and Horácio Costa declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this kind of retrospective study, formal consent is not required.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guedes, T., Azevedo, M., Morais, J. et al. Replantation and revascularization of the upper extremity: clinical experience of a microsurgical department in Portugal. Eur J Plast Surg 42, 457–462 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-019-01520-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-019-01520-2