Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Rhinoplasty in elderly patients: analysis of outcomes and patient’s satisfaction following 20 years experiences

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Rhinoplasty is one of the most complex procedures in plastic surgery. In patients over 65, the procedure is even more demanding because of the coexistence of multiple complicating psychological and anatomical factors. The aims of our study were to analyze the necessity of rhinoplasty in elderly patients, to analyze the perception of patients before and after procedures and compare these patients with younger population, to review all cases done in our department over the past 20 years, and to summarize all procedures.

Methods

We designed a retrospective study of patients that had submitted to primary rhinoplasty by the same surgical team from 1997 to 2017. The inclusion criteria were as follows: Italian national patients of either sex over 65 years old who underwent primary rhinoplasty in our department. The exclusion criteria were as follows: psychiatric disorder, abuse of alcohol or drugs, patients who had undergone secondary rhinoplasty, or patients with previous trauma. Our final sample was 125 patients. We submitted FACE-Q rhinoplasty module to 25 patients comparing the results with a control group of younger patients.

Results

Of 1703 patients who underwent primary rhinoplasty in our Department of Plastic Surgery from 1997 to 2017, only 125 were over 65 years old. The average age was 68 years old, with 72 male and 53 female patients. From June 2016 to May 2017, the Italian version of FACE-Q rhinoplasty module was given to 25 elderly patients pre- and postoperatively and to 25 younger patients (control group), for comparison. All patients answered the postoperative module 6 months after their procedure. The most noticeable result was in tip perception, in fact in the > 65 years old group. Two surgeons reviewed and summarized all 125 cases and procedures, which were 89 open approach, 36 closed approach, 17 reduction rhinoplasty, 108 augmentation rhinoplasty, 47 dorsum grafts, 159 tip grafts, 9 alar region grafts, and 5 other grafts.

Conclusions

The tip of the nose is the focus of attention for older patients who want to undergo this surgery and require surgical procedures for increased projection and support. Augmentation rhinoplasty plays a fundamental role in the remodeling of the nose in patients over 65 years old.

Level of Evidence: Level III, risk/prognostic study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barone M, Cogliandro A, Di Stefano N, Tambone V, Persichetti P (2017) A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures after rhinoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274(4):1807–1811

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Moss TP, Cogliandro A, Pennacchini M, Tambone V, Persichetti P (2013) Appearance distress and dysfunction in the elderly: international contrasts across Italy and the UK using DAS59. Aesthetic Plast Surg 37(6):1187–1193

  3. Barone M, Cogliandro A, Di Stefano N, Aronica R, Tambone V, Persichetti P (2017) Linguistic validation of the “FACE-Q Rhinoplasty Module” in Italian. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274(3):1771–1772

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tenna S, Cogliandro A, Barone M, Panasiti V, Tirindelli M, Nobile C, Persichetti P (2017) Comparative study using autologous fat grafts plus platelet-rich plasma with or without fractional CO2 laser resurfacing in treatment of acne scars: analysis of outcomes and satisfaction with FACE-Q. Aesthetic Plast Surg 41(3):661–666

  5. Klassen AF, Cano SJ, East CA, Baker SB, Badia L, Schwitzer JA, Pusic AL (2016) Development and psychometric evaluation of the FACE-Q scales for patients undergoing rhinoplasty. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 18(1):27–35

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Parkes ML, Kamer FM (1973) The mature nose. Laryngoscope 83(2):157–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Patterson CN (1980) The aging nose: characteristics and correction. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 13:275–288

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rees TD (1978) Rhinoplasty in the older adult. Ann Plast Surg 1(1):27–29

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Barone M, Cogliandro A, La Monaca G, Tambone V, Persichetti P (2015) Cognitive investigation study of patients admitted for cosmetic surgery: information, expectations, and consent for treatment. Arch Plast Surg 42(1):46–51

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Rohrich RJ, Hollier LH Jr, Janis JE, Kim J (2004) Rhinoplasty with advancing age. Plast Reconstr Surg 114(7):1936–1944

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rohrich RJ, Hollier LH (1999) Rhinoplasty with advancing age: characteristics and management. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 32(4):755–773

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rohrich RJ, Hollier LH (1996) Rhinoplasty with advancing age. Characteristics and management. Clin Plast Surg 23(2):281–296

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Massie JP, Runyan CM, Stern MJ, et al (2016) Nasal septal anatomy in skeletally mature patients with cleft lip and palate. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 18(5):347–353

  14. Krmpotić-Nemanić J, Kostović I, Rudan P, Nemanić G (1971) Morphological and histological changes responsible for the droop of the nasal tip in advanced age. Acta Otolaryngol 71(1-6):278–281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Caterson SA, Singh M, Kueckelhaus M, Caterson EJ, Eriksson E (2015) Skin excision as an adjunctive technique to rhinoplasty in middle-aged and elderly patients. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 3:e532

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Slavit DH, Lipton RJ, Kern EB, McCaffrey TV (1990) Rhinolift operation in the treatment of the aging nose. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 103:462–467

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Klassen AF, Cano SJ, Schwitzer JA, Scott AM, Pusic AL (2015) FACE-Q scales for health-related quality of life, early life impact and satisfaction with outcomes and decision to have treatment: development and validation. Plast Reconstr Surg 135(2):375–386

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Barone M, Cogliandro A, Coppola MM, Persichetti P (2017) Role of patient-reported outcomes measures in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017  Apr 5. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003538

  19. Barone M, Cogliandro A, Cagli B, Persichetti P (2015) FACE-Q scales for health-related quality of life, early life impact, satisfaction with outcomes, and decision to have treatment: development and validation. Plast Reconstr Surg 136:272e–273e

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Barone M, Cogliandro A, Cagli B, Persichetti P (2015) The face as an expression of who you are. Plast Reconstr Surg 135:640e–641e

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Johnson CM Jr, Anderson JR (1978) Nose-lift operation: an adjunct to aging-face surgery. Arch Otolaryngol 104:1–3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mauro Barone.

Ethics declarations

Funding

None.

Conflict of interest

Mauro Barone, Annalisa Cogliandro, G. Cassotta, M. Signoretti, Nicola Di Stefano, Vittoradolfo Tambone, Paolo Persichetti declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of our University. All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Patients provided informed consent before participating in this study.

Patient consent

Patients provided written consent for the use of their images.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barone, M., Cogliandro, A., Cassotta, G. et al. Rhinoplasty in elderly patients: analysis of outcomes and patient’s satisfaction following 20 years experiences. Eur J Plast Surg 41, 395–400 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-017-1387-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-017-1387-7

Keywords

Navigation