Abstract
An organic-rich columnar prismatic outer shell layer, which extends far beyond the underlying nacre, has allowed pterioid bivalves (the pearl oysters and their allies) to develop flexible valve margins, allowing a tight hermetic seal when shut. In some taxa, the microstructural arrangement is known to be asymmetrically developed between the two valves. The asymmetry was surveyed across 29 taxa of pterioids (including representatives of known genera) confirming that it is typically the right valve which has a greater expanse of prism-only shell (and less nacre) and showing that this portion of the right valve has more organic content (more than twice the value in some instances) than the equivalent in the left. A more detailed investigation of prismatic material in Pteria penguin comparing the right and left valves revealed that the right valve flange has a higher density of smaller prisms, each with its organic envelope, and not a greater thickness of the organic envelopes themselves. The flange is also thinner on the right valve and shown here to be very flexible when wet. This allows it to bend against the rigid left valve when the shell is closed. Comparison of this structural asymmetry in the pterioids with five outgroup taxa in the Ostreidae and Pinnidae suggests that clades with the asymmetry have been freed from the constraints of a flattened valve morphology and to develop inequivalved forms.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Molluscan shell is a biocomposite in which a stiff mineralised phase (usually calcite or aragonite) is embedded in a softer organic matrix that allows energy dissipation, toughness and flexibility (Currey 1999; O’Toole-Howes et al. 2019; Strąg et al. 2020). Shells typically are made of multiple microstructural arrangements, arranged in layers, each having distinctive hierarchical arrangements of the mineral and organic phases (Taylor et al. 1969, 1973; Bieler et al. 2014). Different microstructural types have different properties in relation to not only mechanics but also other factors, such as resistance to dissolution (Chadwick et al. 2019). For any particular taxon, the precise microstructures used for layers are genetically fixed, but the relative thickness of them may be subject to ecophenotypic variation (Telesca et al. 2019). The evolution of particular microstructures and their combinations are presumably under strong evolutionary control, balancing selective advantages and their metabolic costs.
There has been considerable interest in the mechanical performance of biocomposites, in particular of nacre which is well known for its toughness (Jackson et al. 1988; Barthelat et al. 2006; Lin and Meyers 2009; Gim et al. 2019; Sun and Bhushan 2012), and the ways in which they might inform biomimetic designs (e.g. Kakisawa and Sumitomo 2012; Waqar et al. 2018). But despite it being a very early microstructure (Taylor 1973; Vendrasco et al. 2019), many extant molluscan groups do not secrete nacre and even where it does occur, it is always accompanied by at least one other microstructure (usually external to it) (Cartwright and Checa 2007; Bieler et al. 2014). In the bivalves, which show an extraordinary diversity of microstructural arrangements (Taylor et al. 1969, 1973; Bieler et al. 2014), nacre is often accompanied by an outer layer of aragonite prisms in the Palaeoheterodonta and the Anomalodesmata or by calcite prisms in Pteriomorphia. There remains much to understand about the adaptive significance of different microstructural arrangements and the overall aim of this paper is to explore this in relation to the pterioid bivalves.
A common feature of epifaunal bivalves is the possession of flexible valve margins that allow tight hermetic sealing along a broad flat flange around the edge of the shell (Vermeij 1987). This character is found in a range of taxa but principally in the Pteriomorphia within the order Ostreida which are characterised by the possession of an outer shell layer of calcite prisms perpendicular to the valve surface (Bieler et al. 2014; Lemer et al. 2016) (Fig. 1). In the living bivalve, these margins are very flexible and allow it, upon adduction, to close the shell with a substantial flange of material from both valves juxtaposed rather than just at the very margins. The excellent hermetic seal which it allows may have a range of advantages such as protection against predators or against ingress of harmful substances or loss of fluids (Vermeij 1987), in particular through desiccation during emersion in intertidal taxa (Harper and Skelton 1993). Additionally, the ability to form a tight seal after injury allows repair even after quite a catastrophic shell damage (Vermeij 1983; Dietl and Alexander 2005).
Bivalves with flexible valve margins typically construct them from microstructures with a relatively high percentage of organic matrix between the crystals. Here we explore the form of the flexible valve edges in the Order Ostreida, in particular in the Pterioidea. The group is interesting because unlike most bivalves where the microstructural arrangement is the same in the two valves, in many pterioid taxa there is a marked asymmetry whereby the inner layers are less laterally extensive in one valve and also the thickness of the outermost layers appears to differ between them.
The Pterioidea are a clade of shallow-water tropical and subtropical bivalves that exploit a range of epifaunal modes of life, some in intimate commensal relationships with sponges, hydroids and alcyonarians (Tëmkin 2006a). It includes the well-known ‘pearl oyster’ genera Pinctada and Pteria which are of considerable commercial importance. The clade has a long evolutionary history, dating back to the Ordovician (Pojeta and Runnegar 1985), with extinct members of the clade including the Pterineidae and Bakevelliidae, and have been major players in the autecological category of exposed byssate bivalves (Skelton et al. 1990).
Traditionally, the extant Pterioidea have been thought to comprise four families: the Pteriidae, Pulvinitidae, Isognomonidae and Malleidae. While the superfamily is always recovered as a monophyletic group in both morphological and molecular phylogenetic analyses (Steiner and Hammer 2000; Giribet and Distel 2003; Tëmkin 2006a, 2010; Bieler et al. 2014; Combosch et al. 2017), there has been much less support for recognising the constituent families as monophyletic (excluding the Pulvinitidae which is monospecific). Whereas studies based on both morphology and molecular data have failed to support the traditional placement of genera within families, perhaps the most significant finding in molecular phylogenies has been consistent dismantlement of the family ‘Pteriidae’ as a clade comprising both Pteria and Pinctada (Tëmkin 2010; Lemer et al. 2016; Combosch et al. 2017). It is also notable that although earlier morphological analyses suggested the Pinnoidea as sister-group to the pterioids e.g. (Waller 1978; Giribet and Wheeler 2002) with similarities in microstructure being amongst key evidence, a more exhaustive morphological analysis (Tëmkin 2006a) and various molecular analyses have consistently shown the Ostreoidea in that role (Steiner and Hammer 2000; Bieler et al. 2014; Combosch et al. 2017). This suggests that the apparent similarities between the pinnoids and pterioids are merely convergent.
The valve microstructures of pterioids follow the same basic pattern. They have two microstructural types: an outer layer of columnar calcite prisms and an inner layer of sheet nacre made of aragonite, which is traversed by the pallial myostracum (Bieler et al. 2014). The nacreous layer does not extend to the valve edges, leaving a single layer of calcite prisms in the most ventral zone. The microstructure of this outer, more extensive, shell layer consists of relatively coarse columnar prisms (up to 150 µm in width in some cases) secreted perpendicular to the valve surface. With growth, selection occurs among individual prisms so that smaller prisms progressively disappear and larger ones increase and become more similar in width as the layer thickens. Individual prisms are separated from one another by relatively thick organic envelopes ~ 0.5–3 µm wide (Checa et al. 2005, 2016). One notable characteristic of the prismatic flange in living individuals is its extreme flexibility, but in dried specimens in museum collections, it becomes inflexible and very brittle (Tëmkin 2006a). As noted above, another key feature of this flexible prismatic flange in pterioids is that it is often more extensive (i.e. wider) on one valve than the other. This asymmetry has been used by Tëmkin (2006a) as a morphological character for phylogenetic analysis and is clearly apparent in Fig. 1a–c.
In the current study, we use the recent molecular phylogeny of the Pterioidea (Tëmkin 2010) for investigating the occurrence of flexible margins within the Pterioidea. Specifically, we seek to (1) investigate differences in the extent of prismatic flange and its organic content between taxa and also between different valves of the same individual to explore the occurrence of asymmetry; (2) explore the flexibility of prismatic material in a hydrated state; (3) consider the phylogenetic and possible adaptive significance of these traits.
Materials and methods
Materials
We examined representative taxa of extant pterioids in the collections of the Zoology Museum of the University of Cambridge (UMZC), and the Muséum National d´Histoire Naturelle, Paris (MNHN), and the mollusk research collection housed in the Department of Stratigraphy and Paleontology, University of Granada (UGR). In all, we were able to investigate species from each of the extant genera of all recognised families (including most of the type species). We concentrated on the ‘pearl oysters’, i.e. members of the genera Pteria and Pinctada and in particular on the taxa included in the most comprehensive molecular phylogeny of the pearl oysters (Tëmkin 2010). Additionally, we studied members of all three extant genera of Pinnoidea and representatives of some oysters as representatives of outgroups. All taxa used in this study are listed in Table 1.
Morphometric measurements
For all individuals observed, the following measurements were made with digital calipers: maximum dimension (dorsoventral diameter) of the whole bivalve and, for each valve separately, the distance of the ventral margin of the nacre from the hinge along the direction of maximum growth (see Fig. 2). From these data, we calculated the ratios LV/RV to capture the degree of symmetry in microstructure and determined the linear extent of the prismatic flange for each valve as a proportion of the entire valve. Where possible we made measurements for multiple individuals (over as wide a range of size as possible) of a particular species to obtain mean values but this was not possible in all instances. Although less than ideal, the use of smaller numbers appears justified because for those instances where ten individuals were available for study (e.g. Pinctada margaritifera and Pteria colymbus) there were no significant differences (p > 0.05) for the proportion of asymmetry over the range of sizes available. An exception, however, appears to be Electroma alacorvi, where of five individuals there was a greater asymmetry in the larger individuals although our sample size was not sufficient to demonstrate the significance of this.
Optical and scanning electron microscopy
Selected shell pieces were examined by optical and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). For optical microscopy, we used a Nikon SMZ1000 binocular microscope equipped with a digital image acquisition system. Specimens observed in SEM (in high vacuum mode) were previously cleaned with commercial bleach (~ 5% active chlorine), ultrasonicated and air dried, followed by coating with carbon (Hitachi UHS evaporator) and investigated using an Environmental SEM (ESEM) FEI Quanta 400 and a FEG-ESEM FEI QUEMSCAN 650F (Center for Scientific Instrumentation, CIC, University of Granada, UGR, Spain).
For two specimens of Pteria penguin (MNHN 927796, shell length 201 mm, and MNHN 983231, shell length 152 mm) estimates were made of prism density and the thickness of the organic membranes between individual prisms for the prismatic margins of both left and right valves. For each sample, rectangular units (approximately 15–20 × 7–8 mm) from exactly the same areas of both valves were cut out from the ventral prismatic margins. The six positions determined on each bit were evenly distributed on the sample surface and were coincident on both valves when the two internal surfaces opposed, i.e., abutted when the valves were shut (see Supplementary Information for details). The number of prisms was counted within an area 415 × 280 µm. Only complete (i.e. not cut by the edge of the image) prisms were counted. We also estimated inter-prism membrane thickness based on four measurements along transects across the micrographs. The mean thickness of the prismatic lamellae was also assessed.
Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) to determine organic content
The organic content of samples of the prismatic flanges of shells was determined using a thermogravimetric analyser (METTLER-TOLEDO TGA/DSC1) of the CIC (UGR). Briefly, the weight loss of very finely ground small pieces (mostly 40–45 mg original weight) of air-dried shell material (original weight from 20–50 mg) were constantly recorded (precision = 0.1 µg) over a temperature range between 35–38 °C and 950 °C (heating rate = 10 °C min−1). Left and right valves of the same individuals were sampled in all cases and the material was carefully cleaned to remove any traces of periostracum or other adherent material. Shell was removed from the most ventral portion of the margin. Significant weight losses between 200 °C (when both free and structural water losses were complete) and 600 °C (when CaCO3 decomposition into CaO begins) were attributed to the combustion of organic matter (Harper et al. 2009).
Investigation of flexed valves
To investigate the geometry of the flexible margin when the valves were shut, two specimens of Pinctada radiata and one of Pteria avicular from the MNHN collections were selected. They were chosen because they had clearly died when the adductor muscle was fully contracted and remained tightly shut with tissue desiccated in situ. These individuals were embedded in clear polyester resin (Vosschemie, GTS), sectioned along the maximum growth direction and polished to 1 µm.
We also investigated the flexibility of the material when fully hydrated by cutting pieces of prismatic calcite and soaking them in water. When flexible, the pieces were flexed along an approximately co-marginal axis, and inserted into the interior of aluminium or plastic brackets (see Fig. 3e). Some samples were later examined in the environmental mode in an Environmental SEM (ESEM) FEI Quanta 400 of the CIC (UGR). Others were embedded while still hydrated in resin, sectioned, polished (to 0.25 µm), and etched with 5% EDTA for two min. The surfaces were coated with carbon (Hitachi UHS evaporator) and observed in a FEG-ESEM FEI QUEMSCAN 650F (CIC, UGR).
Results
Table 1 presents the summary results for the extent of the prismatic margin and degree of asymmetry between valves in each species studied. Two patterns emerge. Firstly, the extent of the ‘prismatic flange’ is greatest in the Isognomonidae, Malleidae and Pinnoida where the nacre routinely extends to less than three-quarters of the maximum length of the shell, and is often much less (e.g. Crenatula picta and Streptopinna saccata), whereas in most pterioids examined, the nacre is more extensive, i.e. the prismatic flange is less extensive. However, even in the pterioids, the prismatic margin is a significant portion of the valve. Secondly, for some taxa, most notably all Pteria species examined, some Pinctada and some Isognomon (I. isognomon and I. legumen), there is a high degree of asymmetry (taken here to be instances where the metric comparing the two valves is > 1.10) in the shell microstructure between the right and left valves. Typically, where there is an asymmetry, it is the right valve which has the greater amount of exposed prisms. In only those taxa for which we had more than ten specimens, we investigated whether there was any systematic link between valve size and the degree of asymmetry displayed but no cases were discovered.
TGA results
Table 2 shows the results for percentage weight loss in the temperature range 200–600 °C. Although it was not practicable to perform replicates for each sample, to check the accuracy of the measurements, we made two replicates on the same powdered samples of both valves of the Pteria avicular in Table 2. We compared % weight losses at four different temperatures (200, 300, 450 and 600 °C) and found differences of 0.007–0.22%, which indicates a good replication of the results. We also checked differences between two different samples obtained from both valves of a single specimen, namely Pinctada margaritifera 2 (Table 2), at the same temperatures. Differences ranged between 0.04–0.87%, which implies little variability, depending on where the prismatic flange was sampled, but the overall results are consistent between samples.
For some of the taxa (Malleus malleus, Vulsella vulsella, Atrina vexillum and Pinna bicolor) there was comparatively little difference between the organic contents of the right and the left valves. However, for all Pteria spp., Pinctada radiata, Pinctada margaritifera (except for the very largest individual) and Crenatula picta there were marked differences (< 0.25%) between the values recorded from the left and right valves of the same individual with those for the right valve being routinely around twice the value of the left. Only Pteria avicular (both individuals) and single individuals of Crenatula picta and Pinctada radiata presented the opposite case, with the left valves having more organics.
Observations on sections through conjoined valves
Figure 3b–d illustrates the sawn and polished blocks of Pinctada radiata and Pteria avicular, respectively. These clearly show that the marginal parts of the valves are brought into direct contact forming an extensive flange. They also show that the right valve at this point is much thinner than the left. There is a marked asymmetry in the flexure, such that it is the thinner right valve which is clearly bent against the left, and that the nacre in the left valve acts as a rigid foil.
Scanning electron microscopy
For both of the individuals of Pteria penguin for which we measured the density of prisms for standard areas, in five of the six replicates (exception was Specimen 927796, position 1), the number of prims for the right valve was greater than for the left (Table 3) (see example in Fig. 4; all images in Supplementary Information). The difference between the number of prisms in both valves in Specimen 983231 is marked, whereas in Specimen 927796 this difference is attenuated. The one exception might be explained if the prismatic lamella of the left valve was in a very incipient stage of growth, typically characterized by many small prisms, which, with thickening of the lamella, become progressively fewer and larger (the so-called prism competition; e.g. Checa et al. 2016). The thickness of interprismatic membranes varied between 400 and 2150 nm but with no systematic differences discernible between those of left and right valves.
The extreme flexibility of the prismatic material was shown by the ability to bend the wet lamellae within metal brackets (Fig. 3e). Examination of these flexed samples using SEM (environmental mode) provided a good illustration of how the organic membranes expand in the convex zone (Fig. 3e), where the material is in tension. In embedded, polished and etched specimens, this feature is more difficult to appreciate due to the 2D nature of the sections. Nevertheless, they reveal the high degree of flexing the material can reach without fracturing (Fig. 3f). Although we have not carried out a proper statistical study, measurements made on individual organic membranes also reveal consistent increments in thickness towards the convex surface (Fig. 3f). Our results are not surprising since it is only the organic phase which provides the necessary deformation upon bending.
Discussion
Our survey agrees with Tëmkin (2006a) in reporting that the prismatic margins of a number of pterioid taxa are asymmetrically developed, with a tendency for a greater expanse of prismatic flange on the right valve (see Tëmkin 2006a, character 104). Moreover, our data suggest that the prismatic material of the two valves differs, with that of the right being more organic-rich. In the more detailed inspection of Pteria penguin, it was observed that the higher organic content of the prismatic layer of the right valve was the result of an increased number of smaller prisms, each with its own organic envelope, and not by any increase in the thickness of organic membranes per se. In taxa such as Pinctada radiata and Pteria avicular, where the prismatic flange of the left valve is very short, when the valves are shut the more extensive right flange meets the nacreous portion which provides a non-pliable counterpart (Fig. 3b, d).
The organic contents reported herein are arguably amongst the highest levels of organic material of all molluscan microstructures thus far analysed (higher only in Supplementary Information of Checa et al. 2016, up to 16% were reported in a pinnoid). High flexibility of valve margins, whether asymmetric or not, is conferred by high organic content as has been noted for pinnoids (Checa et al. 2016) and the lyonsiid Entodesma navicula (7.4%; Harper et al. 2009), although it is clear that this flexibility only occurs in fresh individuals where the organic material is fully hydrated; O’Toole-Howes et al. (2019) note a two-fold difference in the Young’s Modulus between wet and dry samples of similar organic material from bivalve shells. It is clear that thick organic walls between prisms stretch and compress during flexing, as demonstrated by our observations on re-hydrated specimens (Fig. 3e, f). Our data show that in those taxa where there is an asymmetric development of the prismatic margin, the organic content of the more extensive right valve is typically higher than that of the left and it is clear that it is this valve which flexes against the more rigid left valve. Additionally, the right valve is usually thinner, which also reduces its resistance to flexing.
This trend towards microstructural asymmetry has been achieved independently several times within the pteriomorphs and even within the Pterioida. Figure 5 is a plot of our findings on the molecular phylogeny of the pearl oysters published by Tëmkin (2010). It should be noted that Tëmkin identified the ‘imbricata’ complex as containing a number of units which have been variously identified as species (e.g. Pinctada imbricata, P. fucata and P. radiata), whose relationships are unclear and made problematic by their morphological variability, widespread geographic distribution and their transport and hybridization through the culture of pearls.
Figure 5 reveals that asymmetry occurs in a number of different clades: all Pteria, perhaps two different ones in Pinctada (the more basal taxa P. longisquamosa and chemnitzi and the ‘imbricata’ complex [though this pattern might be interpreted as a character which reverses in the intervening taxa] and also within the Isognomonidae [Isognomon isognomon but not I. ephippium]). These results underline the parallelism and convergence which is rife in the pterioids (Tëmkin 2006a). It is also of note that the outgroup, the ostreoids, also displays asymmetry of valve microstructure with development of a prismatic margin in just the right valve (Taylor et al. 1969; Carriker et al. 1980) suggesting convergent development of a similar trait.
The multiple acquisition of this asymmetry suggests that there may be some adaptive advantages to this derived state. It seems clear that the perceived advantages of flexible margins in general and their capacity to form a tight seal (Vermeij 1987) still apply for the asymmetric arrangement. What, then, might be the advantages of such an asymmetric development? Possession of flattened shells with a low width between the valves may be particularly useful in taxa that nestle in restricted crevices or between the branches of alcyonarians, for example. Such morphologies, however, restrict an organism’s internal space for viscera, most notably perhaps restricting space for gills and reproductive organs. A consequence of the asymmetry between valves described herein, and the ability of one valve to flex against the other may be that it allows the bivalve to develop a more inequivalve form which is principally exploited in the more pleurothetic life habits. It is interesting to note that it is almost invariably the right valve which has the broader prismatic flange and consequently it is the left valve which becomes more cup shaped—which tends to be ‘uppermost’ in the pterioids. In the oysters, the more cupped, less flexible valve, is the ‘lowermost’. There have been multiple evolutionary pathways to bivalves exploiting different adaptive strategies which may be interpreted as anti-predatory (Vermeij 1983, 1987; Harper and Skelton 1993). A key recurrent strategy has been to reduce the danger of marginal damage (Vermeij 1983). The ability to form a tight hermetic seal is likely to be a critical part of the pterioid armour against predators in several different ways, for example, in sealing the bivalve from initial detection by potential predators, by forming a ‘sacrificial rim’ on the outside of the shell and, if damage is not fatal, sealing tightly allowing the enhanced possibility of regrowth and repair without attracting secondary predators. The superposition of the highly flexible prismatic layer with its ability to stop cracks (Strąg et al. 2020), and the nacre which is very tough (Wegst et al. 2015; Gim et al. 2019) but which at the same time is very resistant to bending (e.g. Furuhashi et al. 2009) has created a versatile armour that is effective against a range of predatory taxa with different attack strategies (Vermeij 1987; Harper and Skelton 1993).
Lemer et al. (2016) regard the simple prismato-nacreous shell structure of pterioids and pinnoids as having limited their life habit repertoire compared with other pteriomorphs that had evolved the foliated shell microstructure. Nevertheless, we suggest that the combination of the two microstructures has produced effective armour. The development of the asymmetry described here in the pterioids also enabled morphological novelty, and a broader range of life habits, including becoming pleurothetic and lying on one valve.
Data availability statement
All data are available in the Tables—raw TGA data—available from the authors upon reasonable request.
References
Barthelat F, Li CM, Comi C, Espinosa HD (2006) Mechanical properties of nacre constituents and their impact on mechanical performance. J Mater Res 21:1977–1986. https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.2006.0239
Bieler R, Mikkelsen PM, Collins TM, Glover EA, González VL, Graf DL, Harper EM, Healy J, Kawauchi GY, Sharma PP, Staubach S, Strong EE, Taylor JD, Tëmkin I, Zardus JD, Clark S, Guzmán A, McIntyre E, Sharp P, Giribet G (2014) Investigating the Bivalve Tree of Life: an exemplar-based approach combining molecular and novel morphological characters. Invertebr Syst 28:32–115. https://doi.org/10.1071/IS13010
Carriker MR, Palmer RE, Prezant RS (1980) Functional morphology of the dissoconch valves of the oyster Crassostrea virginica. Proc Natl Shellf Ass 70:139–183
Cartwright JHE, Checa AG (2007) The dynamics of nacre self-assembly. J R Soc Interface 4:491–504. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2006.0188
Chadwick M, Harper EM, Lemasson A, Spicer JI, Peck LS (2019) Quantifying susceptibility of marine invertebrate biocomposites to dissolution in reduced pH. R Soc Open Sci 6:190252. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190252
Checa AG, Rodríguez-Navarro AB, Esteban-Delgado FJ (2005) The nature and formation of calcitic columnar prismatic shell layers in pteriomorphian bivalves. Biomaterials 26:6404–6414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.04.016
Checa AG, Macías-Sánchez E, Harper EM, Cartwright JHE (2016) Organic membranes determine the pattern of the columnar prismatic layer of mollusc shells. Proc R Soc B 283:20160032. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.0032
Combosch DJ, Collins TM, Glover EA, Graf DL, Harper EM, Healy JM, Kawauchi GY, Lemer S, McIntyre E, Strong EE, Taylor JD, Zardus JD, Mikkelsen PM, Giribet G, Bieler R (2017) A family-level tree of life for bivalves based on a Sanger-sequencing approach. Mol Phylogenet Evol 107:191–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2016.11.003
Currey JD (1999) The design of mineralised hard tissues for their mechanical functions. J Exp Biol 202:3285–3294
Dietl GP, Alexander RR (2005) High frequency and severity of breakage-induced shell repair in western Atlantic Pinnidae (Bivalvia). J Molluscan Stud 71:307–311
Furuhashi T, Schwarzinger C, Miksik I, Smrz M, Beran A (2009) Molluscan shell evolution with review of shell calcification hypothesis. Comp Biochem Physiol B 154:351–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpb.2009.07.011
Gim J, Schnitzer N, Otter LM, Cui Y, Motreuil S, Marin F, Wolf SE, Jacob DE, Misra A, Hovden R (2019) Nanoscale deformation mechanics reveal resilience in nacre of Pinna nobilis shell. Nat Comm 10:4822. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12743-z
Giribet G, Distel DL (2003) Bivalve phylogeny and molecular data. In: Lydeard C, Lindberg DR (eds) Molecular systematics and phylogeography of molluscs. Smithsonian Books, Washington, DC, pp 45–90
Giribet G, Wheeler WC (2002) On bivalve phylogeny: a high level analysis of the Bivalvia (Mollusca) based on combined morphology and DNA sequence data. Invertebr Biol 121:271–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7410.2002.tb00132.x
Harper EM, Skelton PW (1993) The Mesozoic marine revolution and epifaunal bivalves. Scripta Geol Spec Issue 2:127–153
Harper EM, Checa AG, Rodríguez-Navarro AB (2009) Organization and mode of secretion of the granular prismatic microstructure of Entodesma navicula (Bivalvia: Mollusca). Acta Zool 90:132–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6395.2008.00338.x
Jackson AP, Vincent JF, Turner RM (1988) The mechanical design of nacre. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 234:415–440. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1988.0056
Kakisawa H, Sumitomo T (2012) The toughening mechanism of nacre and structural materials inspired by nacre. Sci Technol Adv Mater 12:064710. https://doi.org/10.1088/1468-6996/12/6/064710
Lemer S, González VL, Bieler R, Giribet G (2016) Cementing mussels to oysters in the pteriomorphian tree: a phylogenomic approach. Proc R Soc B 283:20160857. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.0857
Lin AYM, Meyers MA (2009) Interfacial shear strength in abalone nacre. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2:607–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2009.04.003
Mikkelsen PM, Tëmkin I, Bieler R, Lyons WG (2004) Pinctada longisquamosa (Dunker, 1852) comb. nov. (Bivalvia: Pteriidae), an unrecognized pearl oyster in the western Atlantic. Malacologia 46:473–501
O’Toole-Howes M, Ingleby R, Mertesdorf M, Dean J, Li W, Carpenter MA, Harper EM (2019) Deconvolution of the elastic properties of bivalve shell nanocomposites from direct measurement and finite element analysis. J Mater Res 34:2869–2880. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2019.159
Pojeta J, Runnegar B (1985) The early evolution of diasome molluscs. In: Trueman ER, Clarke MR (eds) The Mollusca, vol 10. evolution. Academic Press, Orlando, pp 295–336
Skelton PW, Crame JA, Morris NJ, Harper EM (1990) Adaptive divergence and taxonomic radiation in post-Palaeozoic bivalves. In: Taylor PD, Larwood G (eds) Major evolutionary radiations. Systematics Association Special Volume 42, pp 91–117
Steiner G, Hammer S (2000) Molecular phylogeny of the Bivalvia inferred from 18S rDNA sequences with particular reference to the Pteriomorphia. In: Harper EM, Taylor JD, Crame JA (eds) The evolutionary biology of the Bivalvia. Geological Society, London, pp 11–29
Strąg M, Maj Ł, Bieda M, Petrzak P, Jarzębska A, Gluch J, Topal E, Kutukova K, Clausner A, Heyn W, Berent K, Nalepka K, Zschech E, Checa AG, Sztwiertnia K (2020) Anisotropy of mechanical properties of Pinctada margaritifera mollusk shell. Nanomaterials 10:634. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10040634
Sun J, Bhushan B (2012) Hierarchical structure and mechanical properties of nacre: a review. RSC Adv 2:7617–7632. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2RA20218B
Taylor JD (1973) The structural evolution of the bivalve shell. Palaeontology 16:519–534
Taylor JD, Kennedy WJ, Hall AD (1969) The shell structure and mineralogy of the Bivalvia. Introduction, Nuculacea-Trigonacea. Bull Br Mus Nat Hist Zool Suppl 3:1–125
Taylor JD, Kennedy WJ, Hall AD (1973) The shell structure and mineralogy of the Bivalvia. II. Lucinacea-Clavagellacea, Conclusions. Bull Br Mus Nat Hist Zool 22:25384
Telesca L, Peck LS, Sanders T, Thyrring J, Sehr MK, Harper EM (2019) Plasticity and environmental heterogeneity predict geographic resilience patterns of foundation species to future change. Glob Change Biol 25:4179–4193. https://doi.org/10.1101/401588
Tëmkin I (2006a) Morphological perspective on classification and evolution of Recent Pterioidea (Mollusca: Bivalvia). Zool J Linnean Soc 148:253–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2006.00257.x
Tëmkin I (2006b) Anatomy, shell morphology, and microstructure of the living fossil Pulvinites exempla (Hedley, 1914) (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Pulvinitidae). Zool J Linnean Soc 148:523–552. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2006.00263.x
Tëmkin I (2010) Molecular phylogeny of pearl oysters and their relatives (Mollusca, Bivalvia, Pterioidea). BMC Evol Biol 10:342. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-10-342
Vendrasco MJ, Checa AG, Heimbrock WP (2019) Remarkable preservation of shell microstructures from the Late Ordovician of the Cincinnati Arch region, USA, and the success of nacre among Ordovician mollusks. J Paleontol 93:658–672. https://doi.org/10.1017/jpa.2018.106
Vermeij GJ (1983) Traces and trends of predation, with special reference to bivalved animals. Palaeontology 26:455–465
Vermeij GJ (1987) Evolution and escalation. An ecological history of life. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Waller TR (1978) Morphology, morphoclines and a new classification of the Pteriomorphia (Mollusca: Bivalvia). Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 284:345–365. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1978.0072
Waqar T, Akhtar SS, Arif AFM, Hakeem AS (2018) Design and development of ceramic-based composites with tailored properties for cutting tool inserts. Ceram Int 44:2421–22431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.09.009
Wegst UGK, Bai H, Saiz E, Tomsia AP, Ritchie RO (2015) Bioinspired structural materials. Nat Mater 14:23–36. https://doi.org/10.1038/NMAT4089
Acknowledgements
Funding was provided by projects CGL2013-48247-P and CGL 2017-85118-P of the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación. A.G.C. also acknowledges the Research Group RNM363 (Junta de Andalucía) and the Unidad Científica de Excelencia UCE-PP2016-05 of the University of Granada for financial support. We are grateful to Philippe Maestrati for access to the MNHN collections, Mercedes Checa for assistance with measurements and the constructive comments of two reviewers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
No live individuals were captured as part of this study.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: J. Grassle.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Reviewed by G. Vermeij and an undisclosed expert.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Harper, E.M., Checa, A.G. Tightly shut: flexible valve margins and microstructural asymmetry in pterioid bivalves. Mar Biol 167, 78 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-020-03693-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-020-03693-y