Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mitigating the Denosumab-Induced Rebound Phenomenon with Alternating Short- and Long-Acting Anti-resorptive Therapy in a Young Boy with Severe OI Type VI

  • Case Reports
  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) type VI, a recessively inherited form of OI caused by mutations in SERPINF1, is a severe form distinguished by osteomalacia on bone histomorphometry. We describe a boy with severe OI type VI who was initially treated with intravenous (IV) zoledronic acid (ZA) at 1.4 years of age; however, a year later he transitioned to denosumab 1 mg/kg sub-cutaneously every three months in an effort to decrease fracture rates. After two years on denosumab, he presented with symptomatic hypercalcemia due to the denosumab-induced, hyper-resorptive rebound phenomenon. Laboratory parameters at the time of the rebound were as follows: elevated serum ionized calcium (1.62 mmol/L, N 1.16–1.36), elevated serum creatinine due to hypercalcemia-induced muscle catabolism (83 µmol/L, N 9–55), and suppressed parathyroid hormone (PTH) (< 0.7 pmol/L, N 1.3–5.8). The hypercalcemia was responsive to low-dose IV pamidronate, with a rapid decline in serum ionized calcium, and otherwise normalization of the aforementioned parameters within 10 days. To benefit from the powerful, albeit short-term, anti-resorptive effect of denosumab without further rebound episodes, he was treated thereafter with denosumab 1 mg/kg alternating every three months with IV ZA 0.025 mg/kg. Five years later, he remained on dual alternating anti-resorptive therapy without further rebound episodes, and an overall improvement in his clinical status. This novel pharmacological approach of alternating short- and long-term anti-resorptive therapy every three months has not previously been described. Our report suggests this strategy may be an effective method for prevention of the rebound phenomenon in select children for whom denosumab may be beneficial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ward LM, Bardai G, Moffatt P, Al-Jallad H, Trejo P, Glorieux FH, Rauch F (2016) Osteogenesis imperfecta type VI in individuals from Northern Canada. Calcif Tissue Int 98(6):566–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-016-0110-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Glorieux FH, Ward LM, Rauch F, Lalic L, Roughley PJ, Travers R (2002) Osteogenesis imperfecta type VI: a form of brittle bone disease with a mineralization defect. J Bone Miner Res 17(1):30–38. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.1.30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Trejo P, Palomo T, Montpetit K, Fassier F, Sato A, Glorieux FH, Rauch F (2017) Long-term follow-up in osteogenesis imperfecta type VI. Osteoporos Int 28(10):2975–2983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-4141-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Baron R, Ferrari S, Russell RGG (2011) Denosumab and bisphosphonates: different mechanisms of action and effects. Bone 48(4):677–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2010.11.020

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Trejo P, Rauch F, Ward LM (2018) Hypercalcemia and hypercalciuria during denosumab treatment in children with osteogenesis imperfecta type VI. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 18(1):76–80

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Hoyer-Kuhn H, Franklin J, Allo G, Kron M, Netzer C, Eysel P, Hero B, Schoenau E, Semler O (2016) Safety and efficacy of denosumab in children with osteogenesis imperfecta: a first prospective trial. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 16(1):24–32

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Land C, Rauch F, Travers R, Glorieux FH (2007) Osteogenesis imperfecta type VI in childhood and adolescence: effects of cyclical intravenous pamidronate treatment. Bone 40(3):638–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2006.10.010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Glorieux FH, Travers R, Taylor A, Bowen JR, Rauch F, Norman M, Parfitt AM (2000) Normative data for iliac bone histomorphometry in growing children. Bone 26(2):103–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/s8756-3282(99)00257-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. McDonald MM, Khoo WH, Ng PY, Xiao Y, Zamerli J, Thatcher P, Kyaw W, Pathmanandavel K, Grootveld AK, Moran I et al (2021) Osteoclasts recycle via osteomorphs during RANKL-stimulated bone resorption. Cell 184(5):1330-1347.e13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.02.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Boyce AM (2017) Denosumab: an emerging therapy in pediatric bone disorders. Curr Osteoporos Rep 15(4):283–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-017-0380-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Anastasilakis AD, Makras P, Doulgeraki A, Polyzos SA, Guarnieri V, Papapoulos SE (2021) Denosumab for the treatment of primary pediatric osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 32(11):2377–2381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-021-06002-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Horiuchi K, Kobayashi E, Mizuno T, Susa M, Chiba K (2021) Hypercalcemia following discontinuation of denosumab therapy: a systematic review. Bone Rep 15:101148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bonr.2021.101148

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Sydlik C, Dürr HR, Pozza SBD, Weißenbacher C, Roeb J, Schmidt H (2020) Hypercalcaemia after treatment with denosumab in children: bisphosphonates as an option for therapy and prevention? World J Pediatr 16(5):520–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12519-020-00378-w

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Brown JP, Roux C, Törring O, Ho PR, Beck Jensen JE, Gilchrist N, Recknor C, Austin M, Wang A, Grauer A, Wagman RB (2013) Discontinuation of denosumab and associated fracture incidence: analysis from the fracture reduction evaluation of denosumab in osteoporosis every 6 months (FREEDOM) trial. J Bone Miner Res 28(4):746–752. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.1808

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Vanderniet JA, Wall CL, Mullins A, London K, Lim L, Hibbert S, Briody J, Padhye B, Poon M, Biggin A, Dalla-Pozza L, Munns CF (2022) Denosumab for central giant cell granuloma in an Australian tertiary paediatric centre. Bone 159:116395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2022.116395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sølling AS, Harsløf T, Langdahl B (2021) Treatment with zoledronate subsequent to denosumab in osteoporosis: a 2-year randomized study. J Bone Miner Res 36(7):1245–1254. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.4305

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tsourdi E, Langdahl B, Cohen-Solal M, Aubry-Rozier B, Eriksen EF, Guañabens N, Obermayer-Pietsch B, Ralston SH, Eastell R, Zillikens MC (2017) Discontinuation of denosumab therapy for osteoporosis: a systematic review and position statement by ECTS. Bone 105:11–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2017.08.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Anastasilakis AD, Makras P, Yavropoulou MP, Tabacco G, Naciu AM, Palermo A (2021) Denosumab discontinuation and the rebound phenomenon: a narrative review. J Clin Med 10(1):152. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10010152

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

LMW is supported by a Tier 1 Clinical Research Chair in Pediatric Bone Disorders from the University of Ottawa and the Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute. MER is supported by a Junior Clinical Research Chair in Genetic Skeletal Disorders from the University of Ottawa and the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ES extracted the data from the medical chart, compiled the results, and prepared the first draft of the manuscript, with the assistance of LMW, NK, VK and MOM. LMW supervised the data extraction, the drafting of the case report, and edited all versions of the manuscript. LMW, MAP, HS, SC, and KS cared for the patient. FR carried out the bone histomorphometry, SW conducted the bone densitometry, and KK provided radiology expertise in interpretating imaging findings. All authors critically reviewed and endorsed the final submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leanne M. Ward.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

LMW has participated in clinical trials with ReveraGen, Ascendis, PTC, Catabasis, Novartis, Ultragenyx and Amgen, received unrestricted educational grants from Alexion, Ipsen and Ultragenyx, and received consulting fees from Santhera, Ipsen, Ultragenyx, PTC, Novartis, and Amgen (with funds to LMW's institution). MER has participated in clinical trials with Amgen (with funds to MER’s institution). SC has received research grant funding from Zimmer Biomet and ConMed Linvatec, consulting fees for assisting with surgical training from Stryker and Smith & Nephew, and has participated in a clinical trial with Ascendis Biopharma (with Funds to SC’s institution). KS has consulted for Medtronic and has received research grants from Meditronics, Ascendis and SpinoModulation (all funds to KS’s institution). FR has been a consultant to Sanofi and Ultragenyx, received research grants from MITACS and Mereo BioPharma and a study grant from Ultragenyx, Catabasis, PreciThera (all funds to FR’s institution). The other co-authors have no competing interests to declare.

Ethical Approval and Informed Consent

All procedures performed in this study that involved human participant were in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments. Written consent was obtained from the patient’s caregiver in line with the Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute ethical requirements. Written consent was obtained from the patient’s caregiver in line with the Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute ethical requirements.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

223_2023_1065_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

Supplementary file1 (PDF 1655 KB) Supplementary Figure. Serum phosphate levels pre- and post- hypercalcemia rebound event.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seale, E., Molina, M.O., Carsen, S. et al. Mitigating the Denosumab-Induced Rebound Phenomenon with Alternating Short- and Long-Acting Anti-resorptive Therapy in a Young Boy with Severe OI Type VI. Calcif Tissue Int 112, 613–620 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-023-01065-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-023-01065-4

Keywords

Navigation