Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Preconcentration of DNA using magnetic ionic liquids that are compatible with real-time PCR for rapid nucleic acid quantification

  • Paper in Forefront
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nucleic acid extraction and purification represents a major bottleneck in DNA analysis. Traditional methods for DNA purification often require reagents that may inhibit quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) if not sufficiently removed from the sample. Approaches that employ magnetic beads may exhibit lower extraction efficiencies due to sedimentation and aggregation. In this study, four hydrophobic magnetic ionic liquids (MILs) were investigated as DNA extraction solvents with the goal of improving DNA enrichment factors and compatibility with downstream bioanalytical techniques. By designing custom qPCR buffers, we directly incorporated DNA-enriched MILs including trihexyl(tetradecyl)phosphonium tris(hexafluoroacetylaceto)nickelate(II) ([P6,6,6,14+][Ni(hfacac)3−]), [P6,6,6,14+] tris(hexafluoroacetylaceto)colbaltate(II) ([Co(hfacac)3−]), [P6,6,6,14+] tris(hexafluoroacetylaceto)manganate(II) ([Mn(hfacac)3−]), or [P6,6,6,14+] tetrakis(hexafluoroacetylaceto)dysprosate(III) ([Dy(hfacac)4−]) into reaction systems, thereby circumventing the need for time-consuming DNA recovery steps. Incorporating MILs into the reaction buffer did not significantly impact the amplification efficiency of the reaction (91.1%). High enrichment factors were achieved using the [P6,6,6,14+][Ni(hfacac)3−] MIL for the extraction of single-stranded and double-stranded DNA with extraction times as short as 2 min. When compared to a commercial magnetic bead-based platform, the [P6,6,6,14+][Ni(hfacac)3−] MIL was capable of producing higher enrichment factors for single-stranded DNA and similar enrichment factors for double-stranded DNA. The MIL-based method was applied for the extraction and direct qPCR amplification of mutation prone-KRAS oncogene fragment in plasma samples.

Magnetic ionic liquid solvents are shown to preconcentrate sufficient KRAS DNA template from an aqueous solution in as short as 2 min without using chaotropic salts or toxic organic solvents. By using custom-designed qPCR buffers, DNA can be directly amplified and quantified from four MILs examined in this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jobling MA, Gill P. Encoded evidence: DNA in forensic analysis. Nat Rev Genet. 2004;5:739–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schwarzenbach H, Hoon DSB, Pantel K. Cell-free nucleic acids as biomarkers in cancer patients. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:426–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bremen SU, Miller DN, Bryant JE, Madsen EL, Ghiorse WC. Evaluation and optimization of DNA extraction and purification procedures for soil and sediment samples evaluation and optimization of DNA extraction and purification procedures for soil and sediment samples. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65(11):4715–24.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schrader C, Schielke A, Ellerbroek L, Johne R. PCR inhibitors - occurrence, properties and removal. J Appl Microbiol. 2012;113(5):1014–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Patel R, Kvach JT, Mounts P. Isolation and restriction endonuclease analysis of mycobacterial DNA. J Gen Microbiol. 1986;132(2):541–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wen J, Legendre LA, Bienvenue JM, Landers JP. Purification of nucleic acids in microfluidic devices. Anal Chem. 2008;80(17):6472–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fan ZH, Mangru S, Granzow R, Heaney P, Ho W, Dong Q, et al. Dynamic DNA hybridization on a chip using paramagnetic beads. Anal Chem. 1999;71(21):4851–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Butler JM. U.S. initiatives to strengthen forensic science & international standards in forensic DNA. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2015;18:4–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Hayashi S, Hamaguchi H. Discovery of a magnetic ionic liquid [bmim]FeCl4. Chem Lett. 2004;33(12):1590–1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Del Sesto RE, McCleskey TM, Burrell AK, Baker GA, Thompson JD, Scott BL, et al. Structure and magnetic behavior of transition metal based ionic liquids. Chem Commun. 2008:447–9.

  11. Krieger BM, Lee HY, Emge TJ, Wishart JF, Castner EW Jr. Ionic liquids and solids with paramagnetic anions. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2010;12(31):8919–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Clark KD, Nacham O, Yu H, Li T, Yamsek MM, Ronning DR, et al. Extraction of DNA by magnetic ionic liquids: tunable solvents for rapid and selective DNA analysis. Anal Chem. 2015;87(3):1552–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Clark KD, Varona M, Anderson JL. Ion-tagged oligonucleotides coupled with a magnetic liquid support for the sequence-specific capture of DNA. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2017;56(26):7630–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Clark KD, Purslow JA, Pierson SA, Nacham O, Anderson JL. Rapid preconcentration of viable bacteria using magnetic ionic liquids for PCR amplification and culture-based diagnostics. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2017;409(21):4983–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Merib J, Spudeit DA, Corazza G, Carasek E, Anderson JL. Magnetic ionic liquids as versatile extraction phases for the rapid determination of estrogens in human urine by dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography-diode array detection. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-017-0823-7.

  16. Yu H, Merib J, Anderson JL. Faster dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction methods using magnetic ionic liquids as solvents. J Chromatogr A. 2016;1463:11–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chatzimitakos T, Binellas C, Maidatsi K, Stalikas C. Magnetic ionic liquid in stirring-assisted drop-breakup microextraction: proof-of-concept extraction of phenolic endocrine disrupters and acidic pharmaceuticals. Anal Chim Acta. 2016;910:53–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Clark KD, Yamsek MM, Nacham O, Anderson JL. Magnetic ionic liquids as PCR-compatible solvents for DNA extraction from biological samples. Chem Commun. 2015;51(94):16771–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pandit KR, Nanayakkara IA, Cao W, Raghavan SR, White IM. Capture and direct amplification of DNA on chitosan microparticles in a single PCR-optimal solution. Anal Chem. 2015;87(21):11022–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pierson SA, Nacham O, Clark KD, Nan H, Mudryk Y, Anderson JL. Synthesis and characterization of low viscosity hexafluoroacetylacetonate-based hydrophobic magnetic ionic liquids. New J Chem. 2017;41(13):5498–505.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kreader CA. Relief of amplification inhibition in PCR with bovine serum albumin or T4 gene 32 protein. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996;62(3):1102–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Taly V, Pekin D, Benhaim L, Kotsopoulos SK, Le Corre D, Li X, et al. Multiplex Picodroplet digital PCR to detect & KRAS mutations in circulating DNA from the plasma of colorectal cancer patients. Clin Chem. 2013;59(12):1722–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Behbahani M, Najafi F, Bagheri S, Bojdi MK, Salarian M, Bagheri A. Application of surfactant assisted dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction as an efficient sample treatment technique for preconcentration and trace detection of zonisamide and carbamazepine in urine and plasma samples. J Chromatogr A. 2013;1308(20):25–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Purohit HJ, Kapley A, Moharikar AA, Narde G. A novel approach for extraction of PCR-compatible DNA from activated sludge samples collected from different biological effluent treatment plants. J Microbiol Methods. 2003;52(3):315–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang H, Wang J, Zhang S. Binding Gibbs energy of ionic liquids to calf thymus DNA: a fluorescence spectroscopy study. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2011;13(9):3906–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Stroun M, Anker P, Lyautey J, Lederrey C, Maurice PA. Isolation and characterization of DNA from the plasma of cancer patients. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1987;23(6):707–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Thierry AR, Mouliere F, El Messaoudi S, Mollevi C, Lopez-Crapez E, Rolet F, et al. Clinical validation of the detection of KRAS and BRAF mutations from circulating tumor DNA. Nat Med. 2014;20(4):430–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Devonshire AS, Whale AS, Gutteridge A, Jones G, Cowen S, Foy CA, et al. Towards standardisation of cell-free DNA measurement in plasma: controls for extraction efficiency, fragment size bias and quantification. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2014;406(26):6499–512.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Sparks AB, Struble CA, Wang ET, Song K, Oliphant A. Noninvasive prenatal detection and selective analysis of cell-free DNA obtained from maternal blood: evaluation for trisomy 21 and trisomy 18. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(4):319.e1–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Stemmer C, Beau-Faller M, Pencreac’h E, Guerin E, Schneider A, Jaqmin D, et al. Use of magnetic beads for plasma cell-free DNA extraction: toward automation of plasma DNA analysis for molecular diagnostics. Clin Chem. 2003;49(11):1953–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

J.L.A. acknowledges funding from the Chemical Measurement and Imaging Program at the National Science Foundation (CHE-1709372).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University, 1605 Gilman Hall, Ames, IA, 50011, USA

    Miranda N. Emaus, Kevin D. Clark, Paige Hinners & Jared L. Anderson

Authors
  1. Miranda N. Emaus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kevin D. Clark
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paige Hinners
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jared L. Anderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jared L. Anderson.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 232 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Emaus, M.N., Clark, K.D., Hinners, P. et al. Preconcentration of DNA using magnetic ionic liquids that are compatible with real-time PCR for rapid nucleic acid quantification. Anal Bioanal Chem 410, 4135–4144 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-018-1092-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-018-1092-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation