Skip to main content
Log in

Re: Gi et al. 2018, In vivo positive mutagenicity of 1,4-dioxane and quantitative analysis of its mutagenicity and carcinogenicity in rats, Archives of Toxicology 92:3207–3221

  • Letter to the Editor, News and Views
  • Published:
Archives of Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 17 May 2019

This article has been updated

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Change history

  • 17 May 2019

    The publisher would like to apologize for the failed cross-linking to the following Letter to the Editor by Paul A.

Notes

  1. It should be noted that reanalysis of the data presented in Table 2 yielded a NOEL of 1000 ppm. For details about the approach employed for NOEL determination see Johnson et al. (2014).

References

  • Barlow S, Renwick AG, Kleiner J, Bridges JW, Busk L, Dybing E, Edler L, Eisenbrand G, Fink-Gremmels J, Knaap A, Kroes R, Liem D, Muller DJ, Page S, Rolland V, Schlatter J, Tritscher A, Tueting W, Wurtzen G (2006) Risk assessment of substances that are both genotoxic and carcinogenic report of an International Conference organized by EFSA and WHO with support of ILSI Europe. Food Chem Toxicol 44:1636–1650

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benford D, Bolger PM, Carthew P, Coulet M, DiNovi M, Leblanc JC, Renwick AG, Setzer W, Schlatter J, Smith B, Slob W, Williams G, Wildemann T (2010) Application of the Margin of Exposure (MOE) approach to substances in food that are genotoxic and carcinogenic. Food Chem Toxicol 48(Suppl 1):S2–S24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2009.11.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gi M, Fujioka M, Kakehashi A, Okuno T, Masumura K, Nohmi T, Matsumoto M, Omori M, Wanibuchi H, Fukushima S (2018) In vivo positive mutagenicity of 1,4-dioxane and quantitative analysis of its mutagenicity and carcinogenicity in rats. Arch Toxicol 92:3207–3221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-018-2282-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson GE, Soeteman-Hernandez LG, Gollapudi BB, Bodger OG, Dearfield KL, Heflich RH, Hixon JG, Lovell DP, MacGregor JT, Pottenger LH, Thompson CM, Abraham L, Thybaud V, Tanir JY, Zeiger E, van Benthem J, White PA (2014) Derivation of point of departure (PoD) estimates in genetic toxicology studies and their potential applications in risk assessment. Environ Mol Mutagen 55:609–623. https://doi.org/10.1002/em.21870

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wills JW, Johnson GE, Battaion HL, Slob W, White PA (2017) Comparing BMD-derived genotoxic potency estimations across variants of the transgenic rodent gene mutation assay. Environ Mol Mutagen 58:632–643. https://doi.org/10.1002/em.22137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zeller A, Duran-Pacheco G, Guerard M (2017) An appraisal of critical effect sizes for the benchmark dose approach to assess dose-response relationships in genetic toxicology. Arch Toxicol 91:3799–3807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-017-2037-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul A. White.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

White, P.A., Zeller, A., Pfuhler, S. et al. Re: Gi et al. 2018, In vivo positive mutagenicity of 1,4-dioxane and quantitative analysis of its mutagenicity and carcinogenicity in rats, Archives of Toxicology 92:3207–3221. Arch Toxicol 93, 211–212 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-018-2370-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-018-2370-1

Navigation