Abstract
The objective of this work was to determine the antibacterial effect of Lactobacillus plantarum strains of pork origin against Campylobacter coli strains, and to conduct experimental colonization pilot models in mice for both microorganisms. Inhibition assays allowed evaluation and selection of L. plantarum LP5 as the strain with the highest antagonistic activity against C. coli and with the best potential to be used in in vivo study. Adult 6-week-old female Balb/cCmedc mice were lodged in two groups. The treated group was administered with 9.4 log10CFU/2 times/wk of L. plantarum LP5. L. plantarum LP5 was recovered from the feces and cecum of the inoculated mice. However, when bacteria stopped being administered, probiotic counts decreased. Experimental colonization with C. coli was carried out in five groups of mice. All animals were treated with antibiotics in their drinking water to weaken the indigenous microbiota and to allow colonization of C. coli. Four groups were administered once with different C. coli strains (DSPV458: 8.49 log10CFU; DSPV567: 8.09 log10CFU; DSPV570: 8.46 log10CFU; DSPV541: 8.86 log10CFU, respectively). After 8 h, mice inoculated with different C. coli strains were colonized because the pathogen was detected in their feces. L. plantarum LP5 tolerated the gastrointestinal conditions of murine model without generating adverse effects on the animals. C. coli DSPV458 colonized the mice without causing infection by lodging in their digestive tract, thus generating a reproducible colonization model. Both models combined could be used as protection murine models against pathogens to test alternative control tools to antibiotics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AESAN (2012) Informe del comité científico de la Agencia Española de Seguridad Alimentaria y Nutrición con relación a las medidas de control para reducir la presencia de Campylobacter spp. en carne fresca de aves (pollo). Rev. Del Comité Científico nº 16. AESAN, España, pp 21-55
Arena MP, Silvain A, Normanno G, Grieco F, Drider D, Spano G, Fiocco D (2016) Use of Lactobacillus plantarum strains as a bio-control strategy against food-borne pathogenic microorganisms. Front Microbiol 7:464. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00464
Avnİ Kırmacı H, Özer BH, Akçelik M, Akçelİk N (2016) Identification and characterisation of lactic acid bacteria isolated from traditional Urfa cheese. Int J Dairy Technol 69(2):301–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0307.12260
Balasingham K, Valli C, Radhakrishnan L, Balasuramanyam D (2017) Probiotic characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from swine intestine. Vet World 10(7):825. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2017.825-829
Bereswill S, Fischer A, Plickert R, Haag LM, Otto B, Kühl AA, Loddenkemper C (2011) Novel murine infection models provide deep insights into the “menage a trois” of Campylobacter jejuni, microbiota and host innate immunity. PLoS ONE 6(6):e20953. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020953
Brown K, Abbott DW, Uwiera RR, Inglis GD (2018) Removal of the cecum affects intestinal fermentation, enteric bacterial community structure, and acute colitis in mice. Gut Microbes 9(3):218–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2017.1408763
Castañeda Guillot C (2018) Probióticos, puesta al día: an update. Rev Cubana Pediatr 90(2):286–298
Chang C, Miller JF (2006) Campylobacter jejuni colonization of mice with limited enteric flora. Infect Immun 74(9):5261–5271. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.01094-05
Collado M, Meriluoto J, Salminen S (2007) Role of commercial probiotic strains against human pathogen adhesion to intestinal mucus. Lett Appl Microbiol 45(4):454–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2007.02212.x
Dec M, Nowaczek A, Urban-Chmiel R, Stepien-Pysniak D, Wernicki A (2018) Probiotic potential of Lactobacillus isolates of chicken origin with anti-Campylobacter activity. J Vet Med Sci. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.18-0092
Didari T, Solki S, Mozaffari S, Nikfar S, Abdollahi M (2014) A systematic review of the safety of probiotics. Expert Opin Drug Saf 13(2):227–239. https://doi.org/10.1517/14740338.2014.872627
Doulgeraki AI, Paramithiotis S, Kagkli DM, Nychas GJE (2010) Lactic acid bacteria population dynamics during minced beef storage under aerobic or modified atmosphere packaging conditions. Food Microbiol 27(8):1028–1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2010.07.004
Dubos R, Schaedler RW, Costello R, Hoet P (1965) Indigenous, normal, and autochthonous flora of the gastrointestinal tract. J Exp Med 122(1):67–76
EFSA (2019) The European Union one health 2018 zoonoses report. EFSA J 17(12):e05926. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5926
FAO (2006) Consulta de Expertos. Probióticos en los alimentos. Propiedades saludables y nutricionales y directrices para la evaluación
Fauchere J, Veron M, Lellouch-Tubiana A, Pfister A (1985) Experimental infection of gnotobiotic mice with Campylobacter jejuni: colonisation of intestine and spread to lymphoid and reticulo-endothelial organs. J Med Microbiol 20(2):215–224. https://doi.org/10.1099/00222615-20-2-215
Field LH, Underwood JL, Berry L (1984) The role of gut flora and animal passage in the colonisation of adult mice with Campylobacter jejuni. J Med Microbiol 17(1):59–66. https://doi.org/10.1099/00222615-17-1-59
Frizzo L, Bertozzi E, Soto L, Sequeira G, Armesto RR, Rosmini M (2010) Studies on translocation, acute oral toxicity and intestinal colonization of potentially probiotic lactic acid bacteria administered during calf rearing. Livest Sci 128(1–3):28–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2009.10.009
Giallourou N, Medlock GL, Bolick DT, Medeiros PH, Ledwaba SE, Kolling GL, Guerrant RL (2018) A novel mouse model of Campylobacter jejuni enteropathy and diarrhea. PLoS Pathog 14(3):e1007083. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007083
Gosiewski T, Brzychczy-Wloch M (2015) The Use of PFGE method in genotyping of selected bacteria species of the Lactobacillus genus. Methods Mol Biol 1301:225–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2599-5_18
Guarner F, Malagelada JR (2003) Gut flora in health and disease. Lancet 361(9356):512–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12489-0
Jordan K, Dalmasso M (eds) (2015) Pulse Field Gel Electrophoresis. Humana Press, New York
Kemmett K (2015) Probiotics and enzymes: A good combination. AFMA Matrix 24(2):35–37
Kleerebezem M, Boekhorst J, van Kranenburg R, Molenaar D, Kuipers OP, Leer R, Fiers MW (2003) Complete genome sequence of Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100(4):1990–1995. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0337704100
Lee A, O’rourke J, Barrington P (1986) Mucus colonization as a determinant of pathogenicity in intestinal infection by Campylobacter jejuni: a mouse cecal model. Infect Immun 51(2):536–546
Li Y, Canchaya C, Fang F, Raftis E, Ryan KA, van Pijkeren JP, O’Toole PW (2007) Distribution of megaplasmids in Lactobacillus salivarius and other lactobacilli. J Bacteriol 189(17):6128–6139. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00447-07
Maćkiw E, Korsak D, Rzewuska K, Tomczuk K, Rożynek E (2012) Antibiotic resistance in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolated from food in Poland. Food Control 23(2):297–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2011.08.022
Mills DC, Gundogdu O, Elmi A, Bajaj-Elliott M, Taylor PW, Wren BW, Dorrell N (2012) Increase in Campylobacter jejuni invasion of intestinal epithelial cells under low-oxygen coculture conditions that reflect the in vivo environment. Infect Immun 80(5):1690–1698. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.06176-11
Rajoka MSR, Hayat H, Sarwar S, Mehwish H, Ahmad F, Hussain N, Shi J (2018) Isolation and evaluation of probiotic potential of lactic acid bacteria isolated from poultry intestine. Microbiol 87(1):116–126. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0026261718010150
Roldán ML, Otero JL, Villarreal F, Baroni MR, Carrasco MS, Álvarez C, Simonetta AC (2011) Efecto inhibidor de Lactobacillus casei 206/1 contra Escherichia coli O157: H7. Rev Soc Ven Microbiol 31(1):37–41
Rossler E, Fuhr EM, Lorenzón G, Romero-Scharpen A, Berisvil AP, Blajman JE, Signorini ML (2017) Presencia de serotipos de Campylobacter jejuni O: 19 en la cadena avícola Argentina. Rev Argent Microbiol 49(2):178–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ram.2016.12.002
Ruiz MJ, Colello R, Padola NL, Etcheverría AI (2017) Efecto inhibitorio de Lactobacillus spp. sobre bacterias implicadas en enfermedades transmitidas por alimentos. Rev Argent Microbiol 49(2):174–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ram.2016.10.005
Santini C, Baffoni L, Gaggia F, Granata M, Gasbarri R, Di Gioia D, Biavati B (2010) Characterization of probiotic strains: an application as feed additives in poultry against Campylobacter jejuni. Int J Food Microbiol 141:S98–S108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.03.039
Signorini ML, Rossler E, Diaz David DC, Olivero CR, Romero-Scharpen A, Soto LP, Fusari ML (2018) Antimicrobial Resistance of thermotolerant Campylobacter species isolated from humans, food-producing animals, and products of animal origin: A worldwide meta-analysis. Microb Drug Resist 24(8):1174–1190. https://doi.org/10.1089/mdr.2017.0310
Tannock GW (1999) Analysis of the intestinal microflora: a renaissance. In: Konings WN, Kuipers OP, Veld JH (eds) Lactic acid bacteria: genetics, metabolism and applications. Springer, Dordrecht
Vallejo M, Etchechoury V, Horiszny C, Marguet E (2009) Inhibición de Escherichia coli O157: H7 por cepas Lactobacillus aisladas de queso ovino. Analecta Vet 29:15–19
Verso LL, Lessard M, Talbot G, Fernandez B, Fliss I (2017) Isolation and selection of potential probiotic bacteria from the pig gastrointestinal tract. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-017-9309-3
Vinderola G, Gueimonde M, Gomez-Gallego C, Delfederico L, Salminen S (2017) Correlation between in vitro and in vivo assays in selection of probiotics from traditional species of bacteria. Trends Food Sci Technol 68:83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2017.08.005
Zbrun M, Olivero C, Romero-Scharpen A, Rossler E, Soto L, Astesana D, Frizzo L (2015) Antimicrobial resistance in thermotolerant Campylobacter isolated from different stages of the poultry meat supply chain in Argentina. Food Control 57:136–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.03.045
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by CONICET (Proyecto PUE 058), National Agency for Scientific and Technological Promotion (Proyecto PICT 2016-3495) and Universidad Nacional del Litoral (Proyecto CAI+D 50120150100152LI, CAI+D 50120150100151LI and CAI+D Orientado 2016 2-14). We are grateful to Carolina Olivero, Noelí Sirini and Eugenia Rossler for their technical assistance. The authors would like to thank the Center for Comparative Medicine (ICIVET CONICET / UNL) for their indispensable contribution to the work. We are grateful to Dr. Gerardo Leotta at the Institute of Veterinary Genetics ‘Engineer Fernando Noel Dulout’ (IGEVET), National Council of Scientific and Technical Research, La Plata, Argentina, for his permission to use their BioNumerics software version 6.6 for the analysis of DGGE bacterial profiles. We would like to thank Dr. Marta Cerdà-Cuéllar (Microbiology Laboratory, CRESA, IRTA) for collaborating with us by kindly providing the reference strain NCTC 11366 (Doyle 1948).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by Erko Stackebrandt.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ruiz, M.J., Zbrun, M.V., Signorini, M.L. et al. In vitro screening and in vivo colonization pilot model of Lactobacillus plantarum LP5 and Campylobacter coli DSPV 458 in mice. Arch Microbiol 203, 4161–4171 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-021-02385-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-021-02385-5