Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Voided volume for postoperative voiding assessment following prolapse and urinary incontinence surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Commentary to this article was published on 13 October 2020

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The objective was to compare the safety and accuracy of voided volume with the standard retrograde fill approach for voiding assessment after pelvic floor surgery.

Methods

This cohort represents all women in our repository who underwent postoperative voiding assessment following procedures for pelvic floor disorders between September 2011 and June 2014. One surgeon utilized a spontaneous voiding (SV) protocol and allowed any patient who voided 150 ml or more at one time to pass the trial. The other surgeon used a retrograde fill (RF) protocol. This involved instilling the bladder with 300 ml of water or until maximum capacity immediately after the outpatient procedures and on the first postoperative day for hospitalized patients. For this protocol, a voided volume of 200 ml was considered sufficient to pass the trial.

Results

In this cohort, 431 women had a voiding trial with SV, and 318 with RF. The groups were similar with respect to baseline characteristics but more women in the RF group had a sling-only procedure. The failure rates of the RF (22.8%) and SV (20.0%) groups were similar (p = 0.46). Among women who passed the voiding trial, similar percentages of women returned with urinary retention and needed catheter insertion after the RF (1.6%) and SV (0.9%) methods (p = 0.65).

Conclusion

Spontaneous voiding trial based on a minimum voided volume of 150 ml is a safe and reliable alternative to the retrograde fill method after female pelvic floor procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Klarskov P, Andersen JT, Asmussen CF, et al. Acute urinary retention in women: a prospective study of 18 consecutive cases. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1987;21:29–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Selius BA, Subedi R. Urinary retention in adults: diagnosis and initial management. Am Fam Physician. 2008;77:643–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tunitsky-Bitton E, Murphy A, Barber MD, et al. Assessment of voiding after sling: a randomized trial of 2 methods of postoperative catheter management after midurethral sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212:597.e1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferrante KL, Kim HY, Brubaker L, Wai CY, Norton P, Kraus SR, et al. Repeat post-p voiding trials: an inconvenient correlate with success. Neurourol Urodyn. 2014;33:1225–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barber MD, Kleeman S, Karram MM, et al. Transobturator tape compared with tension-free vaginal tape for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:611–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barron KI, Savageau JA, Young SB, Labin LC, Morse AN. Prediction of successful voiding immediately after outpatient mid-urethral sling. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006;17:570–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Geller EJ, Hankins KJ, Parnell BA, Robinson BL, Dunivan GC. Diagnostic accuracy of retrograde and spontaneous voiding trials for postoperative voiding dysfunction: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118:637–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Foster RT Sr, Borawski KM, South MM, Weidner AC, Webster GD, Amundsen CL. A randomized, controlled trial evaluating 2 techniques of postoperative bladder testing after transvaginal surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:627.e1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pulvino JQ, Duecy EE, Buchsbaum GM, Flynn MK. Comparison of 2 techniques to predict voiding efficiency after inpatient urogynecologic surgery. J Urol. 2010;184:1408–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wheeler TL 2nd, Richter HE, Greer WJ, Bowling CB, Redden DT, Varner RE. Predictors of success with postoperative voiding trials after a mid urethral sling procedure. J Urol. 2008;179:600–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kleeman S, Goldwasser S, Vassallo B. Predicting postoperative voiding efficiency after operation for incontinence and prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kobak W, Walters M, Piemonte M. Determinants of voiding after three types of incontinence surgery: a multivariable analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97:86–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ingber MS, Vasavada SP, Moore CK, Rackley RR, Firoozi F, Goldman HB. Force of stream after sling therapy: safety and efficacy of rapid discharge care pathway based on subjective patient report. J Urol. 2011;185:993–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hooton TM, Bradley SF, Cardenas DD, et al. Diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of catheter-associated urinary tract infection in adults: 2009 international clinical practice guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2010;50:625–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Elkadry EA, Kenton KS, FitzGerald MP, Shott S, Brubaker L. Patient-selected goals: a new perspective on surgical outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:1551–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Molden S, Patterson D, Tarr M, Sanses T, Bracken J, Nguyen A. Risk factors leading to midurethral sling revision: a multicenter case-control study. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:1253–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Nihal Z. Dolgun: data collection, manuscript writing; Keisha Jones: project development, manuscript writing; Oz Harmanli: data analysis, project development, manuscript writing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oz Harmanli.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors did not have any conflicts of interest in preparing this report.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dolgun, N.Z., Jones, K. & Harmanli, O. Voided volume for postoperative voiding assessment following prolapse and urinary incontinence surgery. Int Urogynecol J 32, 587–591 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04346-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04346-w

Keywords

Navigation