Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis
A frequent complication following vaginal hysterectomy is the formation of vaginal vault hematoma. The objective of our systematic review was to assess the impact of various interventions in reducing the incidence of vault hematoma or postoperative febrile morbidity following vaginal hysterectomy.
Methods
We carried out a systematic search of Cochrane, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, HTA database, PROSPERO, meta-Register of Controlled Trials (mRCT), PubMed, CENTRAL, Google Scholar, conference abstracts, and a hand search of journals from inception until September 2018. Our search strategy included interventions in women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy with modified vault closure with inclusion of peritoneal edges, vaginal vault drainage, or vaginal packing to reduce the incidence of clinically significant vault hematomas. Two independent reviewers (SR and AD) extracted data using a structured proforma. Meta-analysis was carried out using RevMan 5.3 software.
Results
We identified two studies on modified vaginal vault closure incorporating peritoneal edges that reported a significant reduction in vault hematoma incidence. Meta-analysis of two randomized trials on vaginal drains showed no difference in postoperative febrile morbidity secondary to vault hematoma [risk ratio (RR) 0.8, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.43–1.50]. Similar results were seen on meta-analysis of four randomized trials on the use of vaginal packing (RR 0.8, 95% CI 0.43–1.50).
Conclusions
Inclusion of peritoneal edges in vaginal vault closure may reduce the incidence of vault hematoma. The routine use of vaginal vault drainage and/or packing has not shown to reduce vault hematoma incidence or postoperative febrile morbidity. We recommend a change of practice to include peritoneal edges in vault closure based on the evidence available in our systematic review.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gupta J. Vaginal hysterectomy is the best minimal access method for hysterectomy. Evid Based Med. 2015;20(6):210.
Gitsch G, Berger E, Tatra G. Trends in thirty years of vaginal hysterectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1991;172(3):207–10.
Thomson AJ, Farquharson RG. Vault haematoma and febrile morbidity after vaginal hysterectomy. Hosp Med. 2000;61(8):535–8.
Kuhn RJ, de Crespigny LC. Vault haematoma after vaginal hysterectomy: an invariable sequel? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1985;25(1):59–62.
Dane C, Dane B, Cetin A, Yayla M. Sonographically diagnosed vault hematomas following vaginal hysterectomy and its correlation with postoperative morbidity. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2009;2009:91708.
Thomson AJ, Sproston AR, Farquharson RG. Ultrasound detection of vault haematoma following vaginal hysterectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105(2):211–5.
Ayeleke RO, Mourad S, Marjoribanks J, Calis KA, Jordan V. Antibiotic prophylaxis for elective hysterectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;6:CD004637.
Pergialiotis V, Vlachos D, Rodolakis A, Haidopoulos D, Christakis D, Vlachos G. Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing for vaginal hysterectomies. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;290(2):215–22.
Gupta JK, Sengupta-Giridharan R, Clark TJ. A randomized, controlled trial of open versus closed vaginal vault at vaginal hysterectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005;84(1):90–1.
Jeppson PC, Balgobin S, Rahn DD, Matteson KA, Dieter AA, Ellington DR, et al. Comparison of vaginal hysterectomy techniques and interventions for benign indications: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(5):877–86.
Lee SJ, Roh HJ, Cho HJ, Lee SH, Ahn JW, Kwon YS. Vaginal vault drainage after complicated single-port access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2017;6(2):58–62.
Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25(9):603–5.
Wells G, O’connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; 2011.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Kirkham J, Dwan K, Kramer S, Green S, et al. Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;10:MR000035.
Morris EP, El-Toukhy T, Toozs-Hobson P, Hefni MA. Refining surgical technique to prevent occurrence of vault haematoma after vaginal hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;21(4):379–82.
Miskry T, Magos A. Mass closure: a new technique for closure of the vaginal vault at vaginal hysterectomy. BJOG. 2001;108(12):1295–7.
Baumgarten M, Vos C, Vervest H. Short term postoperative complications after vaginal packing, a randomised controlled study. In: ICS, Toronto, Canada. 2010.
Swartz WH, Tanaree P. T-tube suction drainage and/or prophylactic antibiotics. A randomized study of 451 hysterectomies. Obstet Gynecol. 1976;47(6):665–70.
Dua A, Galimberti A, Subramaniam M, Popli G, Radley S. The effects of vault drainage on postoperative morbidity after vaginal hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2012;119(3):348–53.
Krishnaswamy PH, Jha MS. Efficiency of using a Foley catheter as a pelvic drain in vaginal hysterectomy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;226:21–4.
Urzua M, Astorquiza MRC, Braun H. Post vaginal hysterectomy packing, is it worth? Prospective randomised study. In: IUGA Annual Meeting, Dublin, Ireland. 2013.
Thiagamoorthy G, Khalil A, Cardozo L, Srikrishna S, Leslie G, Robinson D. Te value of vaginal packing in pelvic floor surgery: a randomised double-blind study. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(5):585–91.
Westermann LB, Crisp CC, Oakley SH, Mazloomdoost D, Kleeman SD, Benbouajili JM, et al. To pack or not to pack? A randomized trial of vaginal packing after vaginal reconstructive surgery. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016;22(2):111–7.
Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–60.
Zhang Y, Alonso-Coello P, Guyatt GH, Yepes-Nuñez JJ, Akl EA, Hazlewood G, et al. GRADE guidelines: 19. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences-risk of bias and indirectness. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.01.013.
Zhang Y, Coello PA, Guyatt GH, Yepes-Nuñez JJ, Akl EA, Hazlewood G, et al. GRADE guidelines: 20. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences-inconsistency, imprecision, and other domains. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.05.011.
Acknowledgements
We thank Professor Bob Freeman for his input into the preparation of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
None.
Details of ethical approval
Ethical approval was not required as this is a systematic review of published manuscripts.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rachaneni, S., Dua, A. Interventions to reduce morbidity from vault hematoma following vaginal hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J 30, 1061–1070 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3829-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3829-6