Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Single prior caesarean section and risk of anal sphincter injury

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Injury to the anal sphincter at vaginal delivery remains the leading cause of faecal incontinence in women. Previous studies reported an increased incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) in women attempting vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC). The aim of the paper was to establish whether women in their second pregnancy, with one previous uterine scar, are at a higher risk of OASI compared with nulliparous women.

Methods

All primiparous and secundiparous women with a previous caesarean section who delivered from 2008 to 2017 were analysed in a single-centre retrospective study. The primary endpoint was OASI. Labour characteristics in both groups were compared, and a multiple regression model was created.

Results

There were 8573 vaginal deliveries of nulliparous women and 3453 deliveries of women in their second pregnancy with a previous caesarean section, of whom 550 had a successful VBAC. There was no significant difference in the rate of OASI between primiparous women and those who had a successful VBAC: 3.5% (297/8573) versus 3.1% (17/550), P = 0.730). Foetal macrosomia (>4 kg) and forceps delivery were risk factors for sphincter injury, while episiotomy and epidural anaesthesia were protective.

Conclusions

VBAC does not confer an increased risk of OASI after a first delivery by caesarean section when compared with nulliparous women. The rate of successful VBAC may be contributory and suggests that the risk conferred by VBAC may be unit-specific. Unit and national-level audit is necessary to investigate this risk further.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fenner DE, Genberg B, Brahma P, et al. Fecal and urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery with anal sphincter disruption in an obstetrics unit in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:1543–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, et al. Anal-sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1905–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang JJ, et al. WHO statement on caesarean section rates. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;123:667–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Marshall NE, Fu R, Guise J-M (2011) Impact of multiple cesarean deliveries on maternal morbidity: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 205:262.e1–8.

  5. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Birth after previous caesarean birth, second. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. Practice bulletin no. 184: vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130:e217–33.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hehir MP, Fitzpatrick M, Cassidy M, et al. Are women having a vaginal birth after a previous caesarean delivery at increased risk of anal sphincter injury? BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;121:1515–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Räisänen S, Vehviläinen-Julkunen K, Cartwright R, et al. A prior cesarean section and incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injury. Int Urogynecology J. 2013;24:1331–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Richter HE, Brumfield CG, Cliver SP, et al. Risk factors associated with anal sphincter tear: a comparison of primiparous patients, vaginal births after cesarean deliveries, and patients with previous vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:1194–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lowder JL, Burrows LJ, Krohn MA, Weber AM. Risk factors for primary and subsequent anal sphincter lacerations: a comparison of cohorts by parity and prior mode of delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196:344.e1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rees P, van der Gaag N, de Beer J, Heins F. European regional populations: current trends, future pathways, and policy options. Eur J Popul. 2012;28:385–416.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. DeLancey JOL. The hidden epidemic of pelvic floor dysfunction: achievable goals for improved prevention and treatment. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:1488–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Eogan M, Daly L, O’Connell PR, O’Herlihy C. Does the angle of episiotomy affect the incidence of anal sphincter injury? BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;113:190–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fitzgerald MP, Weber AM, Howden N, et al. Risk factors for anal sphincter tear during vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:29–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Baghestan E, Irgens LM, Børdahl PE, Rasmussen S. Trends in risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries in Norway. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:25–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell D, Edozien L, et al. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears among primiparous women in England between 2000 and 2012: time trends and risk factors. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;120:1516–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Eskandar O, Shet D. Risk factors for 3rd and 4th degree perineal tear. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;29:119–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hopkins LM, Caughey AB, Glidden DV, Laros RK. Racial/ethnic differences in perineal, vaginal and cervical lacerations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:455–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Laine K, Rotvold W, Staff AC. Are obstetric anal sphincter ruptures preventable?- large and consistent rupture rate variations between the Nordic countries and between delivery units in Norway: incidence of obstetric anal sphincter rupture. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92:94–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The Management of Third- and Fourth-Degree Perineal Tears, third. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Williams A, Adams EJ, Bolderson J, et al. Effect of a new guideline on outcome following third-degree perineal tears: results of a 3-year audit. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003;14:385–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Abenhaim HA, Morin L, Benjamin A, Kinch RA. Effect of instrument preference for operative deliveries on obstetrical and neonatal outcomes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007;134:164–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Powell J, Gilo N, Foote M, et al. Vacuum and forceps training in residency: experience and self-reported competency. J Perinatol. 2007;27:343–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yeomans ER. Operative vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115:645–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Samarasekera DN, Bekhit MT, Preston JP, Speakman CTM. Risk factors for anal sphincter disruption during child birth. Langenbeck's Arch Surg. 2009;394:535–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wilcox MA, Chang AM, Johnson IR. The effects of parity on birthweight using successive pregnancies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1996;75:459–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Khong T, Adema E, Erwich JJH. On an anatomical basis for the increase in birth weight in second and subsequent born children. Placenta. 2003;24:348–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Murphy DJ, Macleod M, Bahl R, et al. A randomised controlled trial of routine versus restrictive use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery: a multicentre pilot study. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;115:1695–702 discussion 1702-1703.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Dahl C, Kjølhede P. Obstetric anal sphincter rupture in older primiparous women: a case–control study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85:1252–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Aiken CE, Aiken AR, Prentice A. Influence of the duration of the second stage of labor on the likelihood of obstetric anal sphincter injury. Birth. 2015;42:86–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, Drogheda, Co. Louth, Ireland

    Bobby D. O’Leary, Ciara E. Nolan & Vineta Ciprike

Authors
  1. Bobby D. O’Leary
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ciara E. Nolan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vineta Ciprike
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bobby D. O’Leary.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Conference presentations

Oral presentation at IUGA 2018 in Vienna, Austria on 29/6/2018.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

O’Leary, B.D., Nolan, C.E. & Ciprike, V. Single prior caesarean section and risk of anal sphincter injury. Int Urogynecol J 30, 959–964 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3797-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3797-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation