Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Two techniques for assessing postoperative voiding function, a randomized trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Letter to the Editor to this article was published on 19 March 2018

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Post-operative voiding dysfunction is common after sling placement and is assessed with a voiding trial (VT) before discharge. We hypothesized that an operating room (OR) initiated retrograde VT (OR-fill) would decrease time to discharge compared with a post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) initiated retrograde VT (PACU-fill).

Methods

This was a parallel non-blinded randomized trial, of women undergoing outpatient sling surgery at a university hospital. In the OR-fill group, fill was initiated after sling placement during cystoscopy by leaving fluid in the bladder. In the PACU-fill group, fill was initiated in the PACU. Pre-VT volumes were recorded and a PVR ≤ 100 mL defined a passed VT. The primary outcome was total PACU time, defined as arrival in PACU until discharge home.

Results

Thirty women were assigned to the OR-fill group and 29 to the PACU-fill group. Time from PACU arrival to VT was shorter in the OR-fill group (41.5 [31.0, 69.3] min vs 69.0 [44.0, 107.0] min, p = 0.03), but total PACU time in the groups was similar (125.0 [90.5, 180.5] min vs 131.5 [93.5, 178.0] min, p = 0.76). Bladder volume before VT was greater in the OR-fill group (557.3 ± 187.3 mL vs 433.0 ± 171.2 mL, p = 0.01). VT pass rates of the two groups were not significantly different (OR-fill 16.7% vs PACU-fill 24.1%, p = 0.48).

Conclusions

OR-fill VT did not decrease total PACU time compared with PACU-fill VT. No overdistension was seen in either group; transient postoperative voiding dysfunction was common.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Luber KM. The definition, prevalence, and risk factors for stress urinary incontinence. Rev Urol. 2004;6 (Suppl 3):S3–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Stav K, Dwyer PL, Rosamilia A, Schierlitz L, Lim YN, Lee J. Midurethral sling procedures for stress urinary incontinence in women over 80 years. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(7):1262–6. doi:10.1002/nau.20862.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kristensen I, Eldoma M, Williamson T, Wood S, Mainprize T, Ross S. Complications of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(11):1353–7. doi:10.1007/s00192-010-1210-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tammela T, Kontturi M, Lukkarinen O. Postoperative urinary retention. I. Incidence and predisposing factors. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1986;20(3):197–201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Klutke C, Siegel S, Carlin B, Paszkiewicz E, Kirkemo A, Klutke J. Urinary retention after tension-free vaginal tape procedure: incidence and treatment. Urology. 2001;58(5):697–701.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Barron KI, Savageau JA, Young SB, Labin LC, Morse AN. Prediction of successful voiding immediately after outpatient mid-urethral sling. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006;17(6):570–5. doi:10.1007/s00192-005-0064-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Richter HE, Albo ME, Zyczynski HM, Kenton K, Norton PA, Sirls LT, et al. Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(22):2066–76. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0912658.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. De Souza GM, Costa WS, Bruschini H, Sampaio FJ. Morphological analysis of the acute effects of overdistension on the extracellular matrix of the rat urinary bladder wall. Ann Anat. 2004;186(1):55–9. doi:10.1016/S0940-9602(04)80122-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosseland LA, Stubhaug A, Breivik H. Detecting postoperative urinary retention with an ultrasound scanner. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002;46(3):279–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Foster Sr RT, Borawski KM, South MM, Weidner AC, Webster GD, Amundsen CL. A randomized, controlled trial evaluating 2 techniques of postoperative bladder testing after transvaginal surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(6):627.e1–7. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.08.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Geller EJ, Hankins KJ, Parnell BA, Robinson BL, Dunivan GC. Diagnostic accuracy of retrograde and spontaneous voiding trials for postoperative voiding dysfunction: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(3):637–42. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e318229e8dd.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim JW, du Moon G, Shin JH, Bae JH, Lee JG, Oh MM. Predictors of voiding dysfunction after mid-urethral sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence. Int Neurourol J. 2012;16(1):30–6. doi:10.5213/inj.2012.16.1.30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kleeman S, Goldwasser S, Vassallo B, Karram M. Predicting postoperative voiding efficiency after operation for incontinence and prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187(1):49–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Odom BD, Ehlert M, Gupta P, Cholyway R, Boura JA, Killinger KA, et al. Clinical comparison of 2 trial-of-void methods after outpatient midurethral sling placement. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016;22(3):172–4. doi:10.1097/SPV.0000000000000258.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Waddle JP, Evers AS, Piccirillo JF. Postanesthesia care unit length of stay: quantifying and assessing dependent factors. Anesth Analg. 1998;87(3):628–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Madersbacher H, Cardozo L, Chapple C, Abrams P, Toozs-Hobson P, Young JS, et al. What are the causes and consequences of bladder overdistension? ICI-RS 2011. Neurourol Urodyn. 2012;31(3):317–21. doi:10.1002/nau.22224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pavlin DJ, Pavlin EG, Gunn HC, Taraday JK, Koerschgen ME. Voiding in patients managed with or without ultrasound monitoring of bladder volume after outpatient surgery. Anesth Analg. 1999;89(1):90–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, et al. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21(2):167–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Brubaker L, Norton PA, Albo ME, Chai TC, Dandreo KJ, Lloyd KL, et al. Adverse events over two years after retropubic or transobturator midurethral sling surgery: findings from the Trial of Midurethral Slings (TOMUS) study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(5):498.e1–6. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2011.07.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lemack GE, Krauss S, Litman H, FitzGerald MP, Chai T, Nager C, et al. Normal preoperative urodynamic testing does not predict voiding dysfunction after Burch colposuspension versus pubovaginal sling. J Urol. 2008;180(5):2076–80. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2008.07.027.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ferrante KL, Kim HY, Brubaker L, Wai CY, Norton PA, Kraus SR, et al. Repeat post-op voiding trials: an inconvenient correlate with success. Neurourol Urodyn. 2014;33(8):1225–8. doi:10.1002/nau.22489.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erinn M. Myers.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Catherine Matthews: consultant for Pelvalon; grant support from Boston Scientific.

The remaining authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Funding

None.

Additional information

This study is registered at the US National Institutes of Health (ClinicalTrials.gov) NCT02150083

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Myers, E.M., Matthews, C.A., Crane, A.K. et al. Two techniques for assessing postoperative voiding function, a randomized trial. Int Urogynecol J 28, 1567–1572 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3310-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3310-y

Keywords

Navigation