Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Analysis of changes in sexual function in women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse repair with abdominal or vaginal approaches

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

To examine changes in sexual function after abdominal and transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse repair.

Methods

Women enrolled in our prospective, longitudinal prolapse database with abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC) or transvaginal (TVR) pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair with or without mesh, between 19 December 2008 through 4 June 2014. The Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12) and the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI -20) were mailed preoperatively, and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Patients completed Global Response Assessments to rate their overall satisfaction.

Results

Two hundred and four of the 300 women met the inclusion criteria: 74 out of 204 (36 %) had ASC and 130 out of 204 (64 %) had TVR. Seventy-two out of seventy-four ASCs were performed robotically and 2 were open. Baseline demographics were similar except that the ASC patients were significantly younger (60 vs 63, P = 0.019) and had a higher rate of apical repair (77 % vs 55 %). Thirty-six out of seventy-four ASC (48.7 %) and 63 out of 128 TVR patients (49.2 %) were sexually active at baseline (P = 0.94). Sixteen out of thirty-eight ASC (42.1 %) and 18 out 63 TVR patients (28.6 %; P = 0.16) reported dyspareunia at baseline. Seventy-two out of seventy-four ASC (97 %) and 86 out of 130 TVR patients (66 %) had mesh-augmented repairs. There was no difference in sexual activity or dyspareunia between the groups at the 6- or 12-month follow-up. PISQ and PFDI scores improved significantly in both the ASC and TVR groups over time compared with the baseline (p < 0.0001). Most women in the ASC (77.5 %) and TVR (64.8 %) groups were satisfied with the results of prolapse surgery at 12 months.

Conclusions

Sexual function and pelvic floor symptoms improved in a similar manner in patients after abdominal and transvaginal POP surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. El Haddad R, Svabik K, Masata J, Koleska T, Hubka P, Martan A (2013) Women’s quality of life and sexual function after transvaginal anterior repair with mesh insertion. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 167(1):110–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim SR, Moon YJ, Kim SK, Bai SW (2014) Changes in sexual function and comparison of questionnaires following surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Yonsei Med J 55(1):170–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Abdel-Fattah M, Familusi A, Fielding S, Ford J, Bhattacharya S (2011) Primary and repeat surgical treatment for female pelvic organ prolapse and incontinence in parous women in the UK: a register linkage study. BMJ Open 1(2), e000206

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Siddiqui NY, Fulton RG, Kuchibhatla M, Wu JM (2012) Sexual function after vaginal versus nonvaginal prolapse surgery. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 18(4):239–242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jia X, Glazener C, Mowatt G et al (2008) Efficacy and safety of using mesh or grafts in surgery for anterior and/or posterior vaginal wall prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 115(11):1350–1361

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nieminen K, Hiltunen R, Takala T et al (2010) Outcomes after anterior vaginal wall repair with mesh: a randomized, controlled trial with a 3 year follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203(3):235.e1–235.e8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Weber MA, Lakeman MM, Laan E, Roovers JP (2014) The effects of vaginal prolapse surgery using synthetic mesh on vaginal wall sensibility, vaginal vasocongestion, and sexual function: a prospective single-center study. J Sex Med 11(7):1848–1855

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Burrows LJ, Meyn LA, Walters MD, Weber AM (2004) Pelvic symptoms in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 104(5 Pt 1):982–988

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Liang CC, Lo TS, Tseng LH, Lin YH, Lin YJ, Chang SD (2012) Sexual function in women following transvaginal mesh procedures for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 23(10):1455–1460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Altman D, Elmer C, Kiilholma P, Kinne I, Tegerstedt G, Falconer C (2009) Sexual dysfunction after trocar-guided transvaginal mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 113(1):127–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Celik DB, Kizilkaya Beji N, Yalcin O (2014) Sexual function in women after urinary incontinence and/or pelvic organ prolapse surgery. J Clin Nurs 23(17–18):2637–2648

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bartuzi A, Futyma K, Kulik-Rechberger B, Skorupski P, Rechberger T (2012) Transvaginal Prolift(®) mesh surgery due to advanced pelvic organ prolapse does not impair female sexual function: a prospective study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 165(2):295–298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sentilhes L, Berthier A, Sergent F, Verspyck E, Descamps P, Marpeau L (2008) Sexual function in women before and after transvaginal mesh repair for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19(6):763–772

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Azar M, Noohi S, Radfar S, Radfar MH (2008) Sexual function in women after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19(1):53–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Milani AL, Hinoul P, Gauld JM, Sikirica V, van Drie D, Cosson M (2011) Trocar-guided mesh repair of vaginal prolapse using partially absorbable mesh: 1 year outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 204(1):74.e1–74.e8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Salamon CG, Lewis CM, Priestley J, Culligan PJ (2014) Sexual function before and 1 year after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 20(1):44–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. De Tayrac R, Devoldere G, Renaudie J et al (2007) Prolapse repair by vaginal route using a new protected low-weight polypropylene mesh: 1-year functional and anatomical outcome in a prospective multicentre study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18(3):251–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rogers RG, Coates KW, Kammerer-Doak D, Khalsa S, Qualls C (2003) A short form of the pelvic organ prolapse/urinary incontinence sexual questionnaire (PISQ-12). Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 14(3):164–168, discussion 168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC (2005) Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol 193(1):103–113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pauls RN, Segal JL, Silva WA, Kleeman SD, Karram MM (2006) Sexual function in patients presenting to a urogynecology practice. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17(6):576–580

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jha S, Gray T (2015) A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse on sexual function. Int Urogynecol J 26(3):321–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ulrich D, Dwyer P, Rosamilia A, Lim Y, Lee J (2015) The effect of vaginal pelvic organ prolapse surgery on sexual function. Neurourol Urodyn 34(4):316–321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mamik MM, Rogers RG, Qualls CR, Morrow JD (2014) The minimum important difference for the pelvic organ prolapse-urinary incontinence sexual function questionnaire. Int Urogynecol J 25(10):1321–1326

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Panman CM, Wiegersma M, Talsma MN et al (2014) Sexual function in older women with pelvic floor symptoms: a cross-sectional study in general practice. Br J Gen Pract 64(620):e144–e150

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Knoepp LR, Shippey SH, Chen CC, Cundiff GW, Derogatis LR, Handa VL (2010) Sexual complaints, pelvic floor symptoms, and sexual distress in women over forty. J Sex Med 7(11):3675–3682

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Schmid C (2013) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4: CD004014.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Alperin M, Ellison R, Meyn L, Frankman E, Zyczynski HM (2013) Two-year outcomes after vaginal prolapse reconstruction with mesh pelvic floor repair system. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 19(2):72–78

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

Larry Sirls is a consultant for Johnson and Johnson and research investigator for American Medical Systems and Cook. Priyanka Gupta, James Payne, Kim Killinger, Michael Ehlert, Jamie Bartley, Jason Gilleran, Judy Boura have no conflicts to disclose.

Source of funding

Ministrelli Program for Urology Research and Education (MPURE-Philanthropy)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Priyanka Gupta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gupta, P., Payne, J., Killinger, K.A. et al. Analysis of changes in sexual function in women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse repair with abdominal or vaginal approaches. Int Urogynecol J 27, 1919–1924 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3066-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3066-9

Keywords

Navigation