Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Endoscopic calcaneoplasty for the treatment of Haglund’s deformity provides better clinical functional outcomes, lower complication rate, and shorter recovery time compared to open procedures: a systematic review

  • ANKLE
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this research is to report the clinical outcome following surgical correction of Haglund’s deformity summarising different surgical strategies and comparing clinical outcomes, failures, complications and return to activities of patients underwent open and endoscopic techniques.

Methods

A systematic search of the literature was conducted using eight different databases. Thirty-five studies were included in the systematic review. A total of 1260 ankles of 1147 patients were grouped in accordance with the surgical approach (open, endoscopic, or percutaneous).

Results

The overall mean age was 44.8 ± 8.2 (range 14.9–82) years with a mean follow-up of 30.9 ± 17.1 (range 3–132) months. Analysis of clinical outcomes of open and endoscopic techniques demonstrated significant differences of AOFAS (87.1 ± 5.9 versus 90.7 ± 4.2 points; P < 0.001), complications (15.5% versus 4.1%; P < 0.001), failures (6.0% versus 1.2%; P < 0.001), time to return to daily activities (17.2 ± 9.3 versus 6.3 ± 1.0 weeks; P < 0.001) and time to return to sport (20.7 ± 3.3 versus 11.9 ± 0.3 weeks; P < 0.001) in the studies that reported these specific outcome measures.

Conclusion

Surgical correction of Haglund’s deformity provides overall good clinical results and high subjective satisfaction. Endoscopic procedures demonstrated better final AOFAS, a lower rate of complications and failures, and shorter recovery time when compared to open techniques.

Level of evidence

Level IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahn JH, Ahn CY, Byun CH, Kim YC (2015) Operative treatment of Haglund syndrome with central Achilles tendon-splitting approach. J Foot Ankle Surg 54:1053–1056. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2015.05.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aldahshan W, Elsherief F, Elbehairy HF, Abdelaziz AM (2017) Endoscopic calcaneoplasty for treatment of Haglund’s syndrome. Egypt Orthop J 53(2):107–112

    Google Scholar 

  3. Allam MT, Fadel ME, Quolquela MA, Samy AM (2019) Surgical resection of Haglund’s deformity by Achilles tendon splitting approach. Med J Cairo Univ 87:3451–3458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson JA, Suero E, O’Loughlin PF, Kennedy JG (2008) Surgery for retrocalcaneal bursitis: a tendon-splitting versus a lateral approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:1678–1682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0281-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Appala Raju S, Rajasekhara Rao G, Vijayabhushanam M, Venkateswara RM, Anil B (2015) Comparision of open versus endoscopic calcaneoplasty for haglunds deformity: a short term analysis. J Evol Med Dent Sci 4(12):1950–1954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Basran SS, Sajid I, Bansal P (2018) Endoscopic management of patients with Haglund’s disease: a prospective study. J Bone Joint Dis 33(1):31–34

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brunner J, Anderson J, O’Malley M, Bohne W, Deland J, Kennedy J (2005) Physician and patient based outcomes following surgical resection of Haglund’s deformity. Acta Orthop Belg 71:718–723

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Calder JD, Saxby TS (2003) Surgical treatment of insertional Achilles tendinosis. Foot Ankle Int 24:119–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110070302400203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen CH, Huang PJ, Chen TB, Cheng YM, Lin SY, Chiang HC, Huang CY, Huang CK (2001) Surgical treatment for Haglund’s deformity. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 17:419–422

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Clancy WG (1980) Runners’ injuries. Part two. Evaluation and treatment of specific injuries. Am J Sports Med 8:287–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354658000800415

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Chandler J, Welch VA, Higgins JP, Thomas J (2019) Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews a new edition of the cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10:142. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.ED000142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. DeVries JG, Summerhays B, Guehlstorf DW (2009) Surgical correction of Haglund’s triad using complete detachment and reattachment of the Achilles tendon. J Foot Ankle Surg 48:447–451. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2009.03.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ewais WM, Romeih MA (2017) Hind-foot endoscopic decompression of the retrocalcaneal space as an appropriate treatment for refractory Haglund’s syndrome. Egypt Orthop J 52(3)

  14. Georgiannos D, Lampridis V, Vasiliadis A, Bisbinas I (2017) Treatment of insertional Achilles pathology with dorsal wedge calcaneal osteotomy in athletes. Foot Ankle Int 38:381–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100716681139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, Schünemann HJ, Group GW (2008) GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 336:924–926. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Haglund P (1928) Beitrag zur Klinik der Achillessehne. Zeitschr Orthop Chir 49:49–58

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hardy A, Rousseau R, Issa SP, Gerometta A, Pascal-Moussellard H, Granger B, Khiami F (2018) Functional outcomes and return to sports after surgical treatment of insertional Achilles tendinopathy: surgical approach tailored to the degree of tendon involvement. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 104:719–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2018.05.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Iversen JV, Bartels EM, Langberg H (2012) The victorian institute of sports assessment—achilles questionnaire (visa-a)—a reliable tool for measuring achilles tendinopathy. Int J Sports Phys Ther 7:76–84

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Jerosch J (2015) Endoscopic calcaneoplasty. Foot Ankle Clin 20:149–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcl.2014.10.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jerosch J, Nasef NM (2003) Endoscopic calcaneoplasty–rationale, surgical technique, and early results: a preliminary report. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11:190–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-003-0365-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jerosch J, Schunck J, Sokkar SH (2007) Endoscopic calcaneoplasty (ECP) as a surgical treatment of Haglund’s syndrome. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:927–934. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-006-0279-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jiang Y, Li Y, Tao T, Li W, Zhang K, Gui J, Ma Y (2016) The double-row suture technique: a better option for the treatment of haglund syndrome. Biomed Res Int 2016:1895948. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1895948

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Kaynak G, Öğüt T, Yontar NS, Botanlıoğlu H, Can A, Ünlü MC (2013) Endoscopic calcaneoplasty: 5 year results. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 47:261–265. https://doi.org/10.3944/aott.2013.3003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M (1994) Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 15:349–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110079401500701

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kondreddi V, Gopal RK, Yalamanchili RK (2012) Outcome of endoscopic decompression of retrocalcaneal bursitis. Indian J Orthop 46:659–663. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.104201

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Labib SA, Pendleton AM (2012) Endoscopic calcaneoplasty: an improved technique. J Surg Orthop Adv 21:176–180. https://doi.org/10.3113/jsoa.2012.0176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Langley GB, Sheppeard H (1985) The visual analogue scale: its use in pain measurement. Rheumatol Int 5:145–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00541514

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Leitze Z, Sella EJ, Aversa JM (2003) Endoscopic decompression of the retrocalcaneal space. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:1488–1496. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200308000-00009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lin HA, Chong HA, Yeo W (2014) Calcaneoplasty and reattachment of the Achilles tendon for insertional tendinopathy. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 22:56–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/230949901402200115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lu CC, Cheng YM, Fu YC, Tien YC, Chen SK, Huang PJ (2007) Angle analysis of Haglund syndrome and its relationship with osseous variations and Achilles tendon calcification. Foot Ankle Int 28:181–185. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2007.0181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lui TH (2016) Endoscopic calcaneoplasty and achilles tendoscopy with the patient in supine position. Arthrosc Tech 5:e1475–e1479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2016.08.027

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Lui TH, Lo CY, Siu YC (2019) Minimally invasive and endoscopic treatment of haglund syndrome. Foot Ankle Clin 24:515–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcl.2019.04.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Madarevic T, Rakovac I, Ruzic L, Tudor A, Gudac Madarevic D, Prpic T, Sestan B (2014) Ultrasound-assisted calcaneoplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:2250–2253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2692-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Maffulli N, Denaro V, Loppini M (2012) Haglunds deformity. In: Foot Ankle Int, vol 33. vol 9. United States, pp 807–808; author reply 808. https://doi.org/10.3113/fai.2012.0807

  35. Mansour MM (2017) Endoscopic versus open treatment of Haglund’s syndrome. Egypt Orthop J 52:190–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. McGarvey WC, Palumbo RC, Baxter DE, Leibman BD (2002) Insertional Achilles tendinosis: surgical treatment through a central tendon splitting approach. Foot Ankle Int 23:19–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110070202300104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Michels F, Guillo S, King A, Jambou S, de Lavigne C (2008) Endoscopic calcaneoplasty combined with Achilles tendon repair. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:1043–1046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-008-0602-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mir NA, Ali N, Khan K, Dar TA, Khandy RI, Dhar SA (2018) Surgical resection of Haglund deformity by lateral approach: our institutional experience on 29 heels. Int J Res Orthop 4(4):595–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 62:1006–1012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Natarajan S, Narayanan VL (2015) Haglund deformity—surgical resection by the lateral approach. Malays Orthop J 9:1–3. https://doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1503.006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Neyisci C, Erdem Y, Bileki AB, Yurttas Y (2019) More extensile osteotomy in the treatment of posterior calcaneal osteophyte (Haglund’s disease). Med Science 8:923–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Nilsson-Helander K, Thomee R, Silbernagel KG, Thomee P, Faxen E, Eriksson BI, Karlsson J (2007) The Achilles tendon total rupture score (ATRS): development and validation. Am J Sports Med 35:421–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546506294856

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Notari MA, Mittler BE (1984) An investigation of Fowler-Philip’s angle in diagnosing Haglund’s deformity. J Am Podiatry Assoc 74:486–489. https://doi.org/10.7547/87507315-74-10-486

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group*. "The Oxford Levels of Evidence 2". Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. https://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653. Accessed February 1st, 2020.

  45. Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Mahomed N, Demazière A (1993) Anterior impingement of the ankle treated by arthroscopic removal of bony spurs. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75:437–440

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ortmann FW, McBryde AM (2007) Endoscopic bony and soft-tissue decompression of the retrocalcaneal space for the treatment of Haglund deformity and retrocalcaneal bursitis. Foot Ankle Int 28:149–153. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2007.0149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Pauker M, Katz K, Yosipovitch Z (1992) Calcaneal ostectomy for Haglund disease. J Foot Surg 31:588–589

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Perlman MD (1992) Enlargement of the entire posterior aspect of the calcaneus: treatment with the Keck and Kelly calcaneal osteotomy. J Foot Surg 31:424–433

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Roth KE, Mueller R, Schwand E, Maier GS, Schmidtmann I, Sariyar M, Maus U (2014) Open versus endoscopic bone resection of the dorsolateral calcaneal edge: a cadaveric analysis comparing three dimensional CT scans. J Foot Ankle Res 7:56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-014-0056-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Sammarco GJ, Taylor AL (1998) Operative management of Haglund’s deformity in the nonathlete: a retrospective study. Foot Ankle Int 19:724–729. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110079801901102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Sanders R, Fortin P, DiPasquale T, Walling A (1993) Operative treatment in 120 displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures. results using a prognostic computed tomography scan classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res 290:87–95

    Google Scholar 

  52. Schneider W, Niehus W, Knahr K (2000) Haglund’s syndrome: disappointing results following surgery—a clinical and radiographic analysis. Foot Ankle Int 21:26–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110070002100105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Scholten PE, van Dijk CN (2006) Endoscopic calcaneoplasty. Foot Ankle Clin 11:439–446, viii. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcl.2006.02.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Sella EJ, Caminear DS, McLarney EA (1998) Haglund’s syndrome. J Foot Ankle Surg 37:110–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1067-2516(98)80089-6 ((discussion 173))

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Sergio F, Catani O, Fusini F, Langella F, Cautiero G, Ponzo I, Zanchini F (2018) Treating Haglund’s Deformity with percutaneous Achilles tendon decompression: a case series. Muscles, Ligaments and Tendons J 8:488–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J (2003) Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 73:712–716. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02748.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Stephens MM (1994) Haglund’s deformity and retrocalcaneal bursitis. Orthop Clin North Am 25:41–46

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Sundararajan PP, Wilde TS (2014) Radiographic, clinical, and magnetic resonance imaging analysis of insertional Achilles tendinopathy. J Foot Ankle Surg 53:147–151. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2013.12.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Syddall HE, Martin HJ, Harwood RH, Cooper C, Aihie Sayer A (2009) The SF-36: a simple, effective measure of mobility-disability for epidemiological studies. J Nutr Health Aging 13:57–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-009-0010-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Syed TA, Perera A (2016) A proposed staging classification for minimally invasive management of haglund’s syndrome with percutaneous and endoscopic surgery. Foot Ankle Clin 21:641–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcl.2016.04.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Taylor GJ (1986) Prominence of the calcaneus: is operation justified? J Bone Joint Surg Br 68:467–470

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Tourne Y, Baray AL, Barthelemy R, Moroney P (2018) Contribution of a new radiologic calcaneal measurement to the treatment decision tree in Haglund syndrome. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 104:1215–1219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2018.08.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Vaishya R, Agarwal AK, Azizi AT, Vijay V (2016) Haglund’s syndrome: a commonly seen mysterious condition. Cureus 8:e820. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.820

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. van Dijk CN (2006) Hindfoot endoscopy for posterior ankle pain. Instr Course Lect 55:545–554

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. van Dijk CN, van Dyk GE, Scholten PE, Kort NP (2001) Endoscopic calcaneoplasty. Am J Sports Med 29:185–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465010290021101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. van Dijk CN, van Sterkenburg MN, Wiegerinck JI, Karlsson J, Maffulli N (2011) Terminology for Achilles tendon related disorders. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:835–841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1374-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. van Sterkenburg MN, Groot M, Sierevelt IN, Spennacchio PA, Kerkhoffs GM, van Dijk CN (2011) Optimization of portal placement for endoscopic calcaneoplasty. Arthroscopy 27:1110–1117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2011.02.030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Vega J, Baduell A, Malagelada F, Allmendinger J, Dalmau-Pastor M (2018) Endoscopic Achilles Tendon Augmentation With Suture Anchors After Calcaneal Exostectomy in Haglund Syndrome. Foot Ankle Int 39:551–559. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100717750888

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Watson AD, Anderson RB, Davis WH (2000) Comparison of results of retrocalcaneal decompression for retrocalcaneal bursitis and insertional achilles tendinosis with calcific spur. Foot Ankle Int 21:638–642. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110070002100802

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Wiegerinck JI, Kerkhoffs GM, van Sterkenburg MN, Sierevelt IN, van Dijk CN (2013) Treatment for insertional Achilles tendinopathy: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:1345–1355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2219-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Wu Z, Hua Y, Li Y, Chen S (2012) Endoscopic treatment of Haglund’s syndrome with a three portal technique. Int Orthop 36:1623–1627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1518-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Xia Z, Yew AKS, Zhang TK, Su HCD, Ng YCS, Rikhraj IS (2017) Surgical correction of Haglund’s triad using a central tendon-splitting approach: a retrospective outcomes study. J Foot Ankle Surg 56:1132–1138. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2017.05.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding to declare.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Mattia Alessio-Mazzola and Antonio Russo authors equally contributed to this work, co-first authors.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostic (DISC), University of Genoa, Viale Benedetto XV 6, 16132, Genova, Italy

    Mattia Alessio-Mazzola, Matteo Formica & Lamberto Felli

  2. Orthopaedic Clinic, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo R. Benzi 10, 16132, Genova, Italy

    Mattia Alessio-Mazzola, Antonio Russo, Andrea Giorgio Capello, Stefano Lovisolo, Ilaria Repetto, Matteo Formica & Lamberto Felli

Authors
  1. Mattia Alessio-Mazzola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Antonio Russo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andrea Giorgio Capello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Stefano Lovisolo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ilaria Repetto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Matteo Formica
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Lamberto Felli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Mattia Alessio-Mazzola and Antonio Russo: reviewers and draft writers; Andrea Giorgio Capello and Stefano Lovisolo, data analysis, editing of results section; Matteo Formica and Ilaria Repetto, draft review, editing of discussion section; Lamberto Felli, final manuscript review, grammar and language editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mattia Alessio-Mazzola.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 19 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alessio-Mazzola, M., Russo, A., Capello, A.G. et al. Endoscopic calcaneoplasty for the treatment of Haglund’s deformity provides better clinical functional outcomes, lower complication rate, and shorter recovery time compared to open procedures: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 29, 2462–2484 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06362-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06362-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation