Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Primary arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears results in significant improvements with low rate of re-tear

  • SHOULDER
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

To conduct a systematic review of outcomes following primary arthroscopic repair of chronic massive rotator cuff tears (RCTs) and to assess clinical outcomes and rates of repair failure. The authors’ preferred treatment algorithm is also provided.

Methods

Medline, Embase and PubMed were searched identifying articles pertaining to primary arthroscopic repair of chronic massive RCTs without the use of augmentation. Primary outcomes were patient-reported outcomes and the secondary outcome was the rate of repair failure. Outcome data were pooled and presented as well as assessment of study methodological quality. Data from studies reporting similar outcome measures were pooled when possible, and mean differences alongside confidence intervals and p values were reported, where appropriate.

Results

Twenty-six studies (1405 participants) were included, with mean age of 62 years (range 52–69). The mean duration of symptoms pre-operatively was 31 months (range 6–40), and the mean follow-up time was 39 months (range 12–111). Complete repair was performed in 78% of patients and partial repair was performed in 22%. Both complete and partial repairs resulted in significant improvements with respect to pain, range of motion and functional outcome scores. The rate of repair failure for the total cohort was 36% at a mean follow-up of 31 months, and for the complete and partial repair subgroups the failure rate was 35% and 40%, respectively.

Conclusions

Arthroscopic repairs of chronic, massive RCTs, whether complete or partial, are associated with significant improvements in pain, function and objective outcome scores. The rate of repair failure is lower than previously reported, however, still high at 36%. The present paper finds that arthroscopic repair is still a viable treatment option for massive RCTs.

Level of evidence

IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Antuna S, Barco R, Martinez JM, Marquez JMS (2013) Platelet-rich fibrin in arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears: a prospective randomized pilot clinical trial. Acta Orthop Belg 79:25–30

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Arrigoni P, Fossati C, Zottarelli L, Ragone V, Randelli P (2013) Functional repair in massive immobile rotator cuff tears leads to satisfactory quality of living: results at 3-year follow-up. Musculoskelet Surg 97(Suppl 1):73–77

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bartl C, Kouloumentas P, Holzapfel K, Eichhorn S, Wortler K, Imhoff A et al (2012) Long-term outcome and structural integrity following open repair of massive rotator cuff tears. Int J Shoulder Surg 6:1–8

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bennett WF (2003) Arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears: a prospective cohort with 2–4-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 19:380–390

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Berth A, Neumann W, Awiszus F, Pap G (2010) Massive rotator cuff tears: functional outcome after debridement or arthroscopic partial repair. J Orthop Traumatol 11:13–20

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Buess E, Waibl B, Seidner R, Werlen S (2011) Outcome of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in large tears: the exposed footprint. Acta Orthop Belg 77:743–750

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Burkhart SS, Barth JR, Richards DP, Zlatkin MB, Larsen M (2007) Arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears with stage 3 and 4 fatty degeneration. Arthroscopy 23:347–354

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Carbone S, Razzano C, Passaretti D, Mezzoprete R (2018) Arthroscopic single-row repair of massive potentially irreparable postero-superior cuff tear. Musculoskelet Surg 102:13–19

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cavalier M, Jullion S, Kany J, Grimberg J, Lefebvre Y, Oudet D et al (2018) Management of massive rotator cuff tears: prospective study in 218 patients. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 104:S193–S197

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen KH, Chiang ER, Wang HY, Ma HL (2017) Arthroscopic partial repair of irreparable rotator cuff tears: factors related to greater degree of clinical improvement at 2 years of follow-up. Arthroscopy 33:1949–1955

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cho NS, Yi JW, Rhee YG (2009) Arthroscopic biceps augmentation for avoiding undue tension in repair of massive rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy 25:183–191

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chung SW, Kim JY, Kim MH, Kim SH, Oh JH (2013) Arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears: outcome and analysis of factors associated with healing failure or poor postoperative function. Am J Sports Med 41:1674–1683

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cvetanovich GL, Gowd AK, Liu JN, Nwachukwu BU, Cabarcas BC, Cole BJ et al (2019) Establishing clinically significant outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elb Surg 28:939–948

    Google Scholar 

  14. Denard PJ, Jiwani AZ, Ladermann A, Burkhart SS (2012) Long-term outcome of arthroscopic massive rotator cuff repair: the importance of double-row fixation. Arthroscopy 28:909–915

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Denard PJ, Ladermann A, Jiwani AZ, Burkhart SS (2012) Functional outcome after arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears in individuals with pseudoparalysis. Arthroscopy 28:1214–1219

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. DeOreo JK, Cofield RH (1984) Results of a second attempt at surgical repair of a failed initial rotator-cuff repair. J Bone Jt Surg Am 66:563–567

    Google Scholar 

  17. Di Benedetto ED, Di Benedetto P, Fiocchi A, Beltrame A, Causero A (2017) Partial repair in irreparable rotator cuff tear: our experience in long-term follow-up. Acta Biomed 88:69–74

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Fossati C, Arrigoni P, Ragone V, Pietro S, Banfi G, Randelli F et al (2014) How do massive immobile rotator cuff tears behave after arthroscopic interval slides? Comparison with mobile tears. Joints 2:66–70

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Galatz LM, Ball CM, Teefey SA, Middleton WD, Yamaguchi K (2004) The outcome and repair integrity of completely arthroscopically repaired large and massive rotator cuff tears. J Bone Jt Surg Am 86:219–224

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gerber C, Fuchs B, Hodler J (2000) The results of repair of massive tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Jt Surg Am 82:505–515

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hao Q, Devji T, Zeraatkar D, Wang Y, Qasim A, Siemieniuk RAC et al (2019) Minimal important differences for improvement in shoulder condition patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review to inform a BMJ rapid recommendation. BMJ Open 9:e028777

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Henry P, Wasserstein D, Park S, Dwyer T, Chahal J, Slobogean G et al (2015) Arthroscopic repair for chronic massive rotator cuff tears: a systematic review. Arthroscopy 31:2472–2480

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Heuberer PR, Kolblinger R, Buchleitner S, Pauzenberger L, Laky B, Auffarth A et al (2016) Arthroscopic management of massive rotator cuff tears: an evaluation of debridement, complete, and partial repair with and without force couple restoration. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:3828–3837

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Itoi E, Minagawa H, Sato K, Tabata S (1997) Isokinetic strength after tears of the supraspinatus tendon. J Bone Jt Surg Br 79:77–82

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim SJ, Choi YR, Jung M, Lee W, Chun YM (2017) Arthroscopic repair of anterosuperior massive rotator cuff tears: does repair integrity affect outcomes? Am J Sports Med 45:1762–1768

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim SJ, Choi YR, Jung M, Lee WY, Chun YM (2017) Isolated subscapularis repair in irreparable posterosuperior massive rotator cuff tears involving the subscapularis tendon. Am J Sports Med 45:1269–1275

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kukkonen J, Kauko T, Vahlberg T, Joukainen A, Aarimaa V (2013) Investigating minimal clinically important difference for constant score in patients undergoing rotator cuff surgery. J Shoulder Elb Surg 22:1650–1655

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lam F, Mok D (2004) Open repair of massive rotator cuff tears in patients aged 65 years or over: is it worthwhile? J Shoulder Elb Surg 13:517–521

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee E, Bishop JY, Braman JP, Langford J, Gelber J, Flatow EL (2007) Outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs. J Shoulder Elb Surg 16:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lee SH, Nam DJ, Kim SJ, Kim JW (2017) Comparison of clinical and structural outcomes by subscapularis tendon status in massive rotator cuff tear. Am J Sports Med 45:2555–2562

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mellado JM, Calmet J, Olona M, Esteve C, Camins A, Perez del Palomar L et al (2004) Surgically repaired massive rotator cuff tears: MRI of tendon integrity, muscle fatty degeneration, and muscle atrophy correlated with intraoperative and clinical findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1456–1463

    Google Scholar 

  32. Novi M, Kumar A, Paladini P, Porcellini G, Merolla G (2018) Irreparable rotator cuff tears: challenges and solutions. Orthop Res Rev 10:93–103

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Noyes MP, Ladermann A, Denard PJ (2017) Functional outcome and healing of large and massive rotator cuff tears repaired with a load-sharing rip-stop construct. Arthroscopy 33:1654–1658

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ok HS, Kim BG, Choi WC, Hong CG, Kim JW, Kim JH (2017) Clinical relevance of classifying massive rotator cuff tears: results based on functional and radiological findings after arthroscopic repair. Am J Sports Med 45:157–166

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Park JY, Siti HT, Keum JS, Moon SG, Oh KS (2010) Does an arthroscopic suture bridge technique maintain repair integrity? A serial evaluation by ultrasonography. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:1578–1587

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Porcellini G, Castagna A, Cesari E, Merolla G, Pellegrini A, Paladini P (2011) Partial repair of irreparable supraspinatus tendon tears: clinical and radiographic evaluations at long-term follow-up. J Shoulder Elb Surg 20:1170–1177

    Google Scholar 

  37. Saupe N, Pfirrmann CW, Schmid MR, Jost B, Werner CM, Zanetti M (2006) Association between rotator cuff abnormalities and reduced acromiohumeral distance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:376–382

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Simovitch R, Flurin PH, Wright T, Zuckerman JD, Roche CP (2018) Quantifying success after total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal clinically important difference. J Shoulder Elb Surg 27:298–305

    Google Scholar 

  39. Taniguchi N, Suenaga N, Oizumi N, Miyoshi N, Araki N, Chosa E (2014) Surface-holding repair: an original arthroscopic rotator cuff repair technique. J Shoulder Elb Surg 23:620–627

    Google Scholar 

  40. Tashjian RZ, Deloach J, Green A, Porucznik CA, Powell AP (2010) Minimal clinically important differences in ASES and simple shoulder test scores after nonoperative treatment of rotator cuff disease. J Bone Jt Surg Am 92:296–303

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tempelaere C, Desmoineaux P, Lespagnol F, Pierrart J, Beaufils P, Pujol N (2017) Surgical repair of massive rotator cuff tendon tears: autologous quadriceps tendon graft versus arthroscopic repair. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 103:435–440

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. van de Water AT, Shields N, Davidson M, Evans M, Taylor NF (2014) Reliability and validity of shoulder function outcome measures in people with a proximal humeral fracture. Disabil Rehabil 36:1072–1079

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. van der Zwaal P, Pool LD, Hacquebord ST, van Arkel ER, van der List MP (2012) Arthroscopic side-to-side repair of massive and contracted rotator cuff tears using a single uninterrupted suture: the shoestring bridge technique. Arthroscopy 28:754–760

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang E, Wang L, Gao P, Li Z, Zhou X, Wang S (2015) Single-versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in massive tears. Med Sci Monit 21:1556–1561

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Wellmann M, Lichtenberg S, da Silva G, Magosch P, Habermeyer P (2013) Results of arthroscopic partial repair of large retracted rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy 29:1275–1282

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Yamamoto A, Takagishi K, Osawa T, Yanagawa T, Nakajima D, Shitara H et al (2010) Prevalence and risk factors of a rotator cuff tear in the general population. J Shoulder Elb Surg 19:116–120

    Google Scholar 

  47. Yokoya S, Nakamura Y, Harada Y, Ochi M, Adachi N (2019) Outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with muscle advancement for massive rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elb Surg 28:445–452

    Google Scholar 

  48. Yoo JC, Ahn JH, Koh KH, Lim KS (2009) Rotator cuff integrity after arthroscopic repair for large tears with less-than-optimal footprint coverage. Arthroscopy 25:1093–1100

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

    Ahmed Haleem, Chetan Gohal, Timothy Leroux, Patrick Henry, Bashar Alolabi & Moin Khan

  2. Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

    Ahmed Haleem, Chetan Gohal, Timothy Leroux, Patrick Henry, Bashar Alolabi & Moin Khan

  3. Division of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Ahmed Haleem, Chetan Gohal, Timothy Leroux, Patrick Henry, Bashar Alolabi & Moin Khan

  4. St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, 50 Charlton Ave E., Mary Grace Wing, Room G807, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4A6, Canada

    Moin Khan

Authors
  1. Ahmed Haleem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chetan Gohal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Timothy Leroux
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Patrick Henry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Bashar Alolabi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Moin Khan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moin Khan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Funding

There is no funding declare.

Ethical approval

Ethics approval was not required for this systematic review.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 13 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haleem, A., Gohal, C., Leroux, T. et al. Primary arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears results in significant improvements with low rate of re-tear. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 29, 2134–2142 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06190-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06190-3

Search

Navigation