Skip to main content
Log in

Enhanced hybrid metaheuristic algorithms for optimal sizing of steel truss structures with numerous discrete variables

  • RESEARCH PAPER
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The advent of modern computing technologies paved the way for development of numerous efficient structural design optimization tools in the recent decades. In the present study sizing optimization problem of steel truss structures having numerous discrete variables is tackled using combined forms of recently proposed metaheuristic techniques. Three guided, and three guided hybrid metaheuristic algorithms are developed by integrating a design oriented strategy to the stochastic search properties of three recently proposed metaheuristic optimization techniques, namely adaptive dimensional search, modified big bang-big crunch, and exponential big bang-big crunch algorithms. The performances of the proposed guided, and guided hybrid metaheuristic algorithms are compared to those of standard variants through optimum design of real-size steel truss structures with up to 728 design variables according to AISC-LRFD specification. The numerical results reveal that the hybrid form of adaptive dimensional search and exponential big bang-big crunch algorithm is the most promising algorithm amongst the other investigated techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alimoradi A, Foley CM, Pezeshk S (2010) Benchmark problems in structural design and performance optimization: past, present, and future-part I. Struct Congress, ASCE: 455–466

  • American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) (1994) Manual of steel construction, load & resistance factor design. 2nd ed. Chicago

  • Colorni A, Dorigo M, Maniezzo V (1991) Distributed optimization by ant colony. Proc First Europ Conf Artif Life, USA: 134–142

  • Dede T, Bekiroglu S, Ayvaz Y (2011) Weight minimization of trusses with genetic algorithm. Appl Soft Comp 11:2565–2575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorigo M (1992) Optimization, learning and natural algorithms, PhD thesis. Dipartimento di Elettronica e Informazione, Politecnico di Milano, Italy

  • Erol OK, Eksin I (2006) A new optimization method: big bang-big crunch. Adv Eng Software 37:106–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flager F, Soremekun G, Adya A, Shea K, Haymaker J, Fischer M (2014) Fully constrained design: a general and scalable method for discrete member sizing optimization of steel truss structures. Comput Struct 140:55–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghasemi MR, Hinton E, Wood RD (1999) Optimization of trusses using genetic algorithms for discrete and continuous variables. Eng Comput 16:272–301

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gholizadeh S (2013) Layout optimization of truss structures by hybridizing cellular automata and particle swarm optimization. Comput Struct 125:86–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg DE, Samtani MP (1986) Engineering optimization via genetic algorithm. Proc Ninth Conf Electron Comput, ASCE: 471–482

  • Hasançebi O, Kazemzadeh Azad S (2012) An exponential big bang-big crunch algorithm for discrete design optimization of steel frames. Comput Struct 110–111:167–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasançebi O, Kazemzadeh Azad S (2014) Discrete size optimization of steel trusses using a refined big bang–big Crunch Algorithm. Eng Optim 46(1):61–83

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hasançebi O, Kazemzadeh Azad S (2015) Adaptive dimensional search: a new metaheuristic algorithm for discrete truss sizing optimization. Comput Struct 154:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasançebi O, Çarbas S, Dogan E, Erdal F, Saka MP (2009) Performance evaluation of metaheuristic search techniques in the optimum design of real size pin jointed structures. Comput Struct 87:284–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasançebi O, Carbas S, Saka MP (2011a) A reformulation of the ant colony optimization algorithm for large scale structural optimization. In: Tsompanakis Y, Topping BHV (eds) Proc. of the 2nd Int. conference on soft computing technology in civil, structural and environmental engineering. Civil-Comp Press, Stirlingshire

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasançebi O, Bahçecioğlu T, Kurç Ö, Saka MP (2011b) Optimum design of high-rise steel buildings using an evolution strategy integrated parallel algorithm. Comput Struct 89:2039–2051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh AA, Ilchi Ghazaan M (2015) Optimal design of dome truss structures with dynamic frequency constraints. Struct Multidisc Optim 53:605–621. doi:10.1007/s00158-015-1357-2

  • Kaveh AA, Ilchi Ghazaan M (2016) Truss optimization with dynamic constraints using UECBO. Adv Comput Des 1:119–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh A, Mahdavi VR (2014) Colliding bodies optimization method for optimum discrete design of truss structures. Comput Struct 139:43–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh A, Talatahari S (2009) Size optimization of space trusses using big bang-big crunch algorithm. Comput Struct 87:1129–1140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh A, Talatahari S (2010a) Optimal design of skeletal structures via the charged system search algorithm. Struct Multidisc Optim 41:893–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh A, Talatahari S (2010b) A discrete big bang-big crunch algorithm for optimal design of skeletal structures. Asian J Civil Eng 11:103–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazemzadeh Azad S, Hasançebi O (2014) An elitist self-adaptive step-size search for structural design optimization. Appl Soft Comput 19:226–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazemzadeh Azad S, Hasançebi O (2015) Discrete sizing optimization of steel trusses under multiple displacement constraints and load cases using guided stochastic search technique. Struct Multidisc Optim 52:383–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazemzadeh Azad S, Hasançebi O, Kazemzadeh Azad S (2013a) Upper bound strategy for metaheuristic based design optimization of steel frames. Adv Eng Software 57:19–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazemzadeh Azad S, Hasançebi O, Kazemzadeh Azad S, Erol OK (2013b) Upper bound strategy in optimum design of truss structures: a big bang-big crunch algorithm based application. Adv Struct Eng 16:1035–1046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazemzadeh Azad S, Hasançebi O, Saka MP (2014a) Guided stochastic search technique for discrete sizing optimization of steel trusses: a design-driven heuristic approach. Comput Struct 134:62–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazemzadeh Azad S, Hasançebi O, Kazemzadeh Azad S (2014b) Computationally efficient optimum design of large scale steel frames. Int J Optim Civ Eng 4:233–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazemzadeh Azad S, Kazemzadeh Azad S, Hasançebi O (2016) Structural optimization using big bang-big crunch algorithm: a review. Int J Optim Civ Eng 6:433–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy J, Eberhart R (1995) Particle swarm optimization. IEEE Int Conf Neural Netw, IEEE Press: 1942–1948

  • Koohestani K, Kazemzadeh Azad S (2009) An Adaptive real-coded genetic algorithm for size and shape optimization of truss structures. In: Topping BHV, Tsompanakis Y (eds) The first international conference on soft computing technology in civil, structural and environmental engineering. Civil-Comp Press, Stirlingshire

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagaros ND (2014) A general purpose real-world structural design optimization computing platform. Struct Multidisc Optim 49:1047–1066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamberti L, Pappalettere C (2011) Metaheuristic design optimization of skeletal structures: a review. Comput Technol Rev: 1–32

  • Lee KS, Geem ZW (2004) A new structural optimization method based on the harmony search algorithm. Comput Struct 82:781–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li LJ, Huang ZB, Liu F (2009) A heuristic particle swarm optimization method for truss structures with discrete variables. Comput Struct 87:435–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadrakakis M, Lagaros ND, Tsompanakis Y (1998) Structural optimization using evolution strategies and neural networks. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 156:309–333

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Saka MP (2007) Optimum design of steel frames using stochastic search techniques based in natural phenomena: a review. In: Topping BHV (ed) Civil engineering computations: tools and techniques. Saxe-Coburg Publications, Stirlingshire, pp 105–147

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sheikholeslami R, Gholipour Khalili B, Sadollah A, Kim JH (2015) Optimization of reinforced concrete retaining walls via hybrid firefly algorithm with upper bound strategy. KSCE J Civ Eng: 1–11

  • Stolpe M (2016) Truss optimization with discrete design variables: a critical review. Struct Multidisc Optim 53:349–374

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Togan V, Daloglu AT (2008) An improved genetic algorithm with initial population strategy and self-adaptive member grouping. Comput Struct 86:1204–1218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang X-S (2008) Nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithms. Luniver Press

  • Yokota T, Taguchi T, Gen M (1998) A solution method for optimal weight design problem of 10 bar truss using genetic algorithms. Comput Ind Eng 35:367–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Hou Y, Liu S (2014) A new method of discrete optimization for cross-section selection of truss structures. Eng Optim 46:1052–1073

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saeid Kazemzadeh Azad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kazemzadeh Azad, S. Enhanced hybrid metaheuristic algorithms for optimal sizing of steel truss structures with numerous discrete variables. Struct Multidisc Optim 55, 2159–2180 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-016-1634-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-016-1634-8

Keywords

Navigation