Skip to main content
Log in

On globally stable singular truss topologies

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider truss topology optimization problems including a global stability constraint, which guarantees a sufficient elastic stability of the optimal structures. The resulting problem is a nonconvex semi-definite program, for which nonconvex interior point methods are known to show the best performance.

We demonstrate that in the framework of topology optimization, the global stability constraint may behave similarly to stress constraints, that is, that some globally optimal solutions are singular and cannot be approximated from the interior of the design domain. This behaviour, which may be called a global stability singularity phenomenon, prevents convergence of interior point methods towards globally optimal solutions. We propose a simple perturbation strategy, which restores the regularity of the design domain. Further, to each perturbed problem interior point methods can be applied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Achtziger, W. 1998: Multiple-load truss topology and sizing optimization: some properties of minimax compliance. J Optim Theory Appl98, 255–280

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ben-Tal, A.; Jarre, F.; Kočvara, M.; Nemirovski, A.; Zowe, J. 2000: Optimal design of trusses under a nonconvex global buckling constraint. Optim Eng1, 189–213

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cheng, G.; Guo, X. 1997: ε-relaxed approach in structural topology optimization. Struct Optim13, 258–266

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cheng, G.; Jiang, Z. 1992: Study on topology optimization with stress constraints. Eng Opt20, 129–148

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cook, R.D. 1974: Concepts and Applications in Finite Element Analysis. New York: Wiley

  6. Duysinx, P.; Bendsøe, M.P. 1998: Topology optimization with stress constraints. Int J Numer Mech Eng43, 1453–1478

    Google Scholar 

  7. Duysinx, P.; Sigmund, O. 1998: New developments in handling stress constraints in optimal material distribution. AIAA, 1501–1509

  8. Evgrafov, A.; Patriksson, M. 2003: Stochastic structural topology optimization: Discretization and penalty function approach. Struct Multidisc Optim25, 174–188

    Google Scholar 

  9. Evgrafov A.; Patriksson, M.; Petersson, J. 2003: Stochastic structural topology optimization: Existence of solutions and sensitivity analyses. ZAMM Z Angew Math Mech83, 479–492

    Google Scholar 

  10. Forsgren, A.; Gill, P.E.; Wright, M.H. 2002: Interior methods for nonlinear optimization. SIAM Rev44, 525–597

    Google Scholar 

  11. Guo, X.; Cheng, G.; Yamazaki, K. 2001: A new approach for the solution of singular optima in truss topology optimization with stress and local buckling constraints. Struct Multidisc Optim22, 364–372

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jarre, F. 2000: An interior method for nonconvex semidefinite programs. Optim Eng1, 347–372

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kirsch, U. 1990: On singular topologies in optimum structural design. Struct Optim2, 133–142

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kočvara, M. 2002: On the modelling and solving of the truss design problem with global stability constraints. Struct Multidisc Optim23, 189–203

    Google Scholar 

  15. Luo, Z.-Q.; Pang, J.-S.; Ralph, D. 1996: Mathematical Programs with Equilibrium Constraints. Cambridge: Cambridge University

  16. Michell, A.G.M. 1904: The limits of economy of material in frame structures. Phil Mag8

  17. Outrata, J; Kočvara, M.; Zowe, J. 1998: Nonsmooth Approach to Optimization Problems with Equilibrium Constraints. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic

  18. Patriksson, M.; Petersson, J. 2002: Existence and continuity of optimal solutions to some structural topology optimization problems including unilateral constraints and stochastic loads. ZAMM Z Angew Math Mech82, 435–459

    Google Scholar 

  19. Petersson, J. 2001: On continuity of the design-to-state mappings for trusses with variable topology. Int J Eng Sci39, 1119–1141

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rozvany, G.I.N. 1996: Difficulties in truss topology optimization with stress, local buckling and system stability constraints. Struct Multidisc Optim11, 213–217

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rozvany, G.I.N.; Birker, T. 1994: On singular topologies in exact layout optimization. Struct Optim8, 228–235

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sedaghati, R.; Tabarrok, B. 2000: Optimum design of truss structures undergoing large deflections subject to a system stability constraint. Int J Numer Methods Eng48, 421–434

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stolpe, M.; Svanberg, K. 2001: On trajectories of the epsilon-relaxation approach for stress constrained truss topology optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim21, 140–151

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sved, G.; Ginos, Z. 1968: Structural optimization under multiple loading. Int J Mech Sci10, 803–805

    Google Scholar 

  25. Timoshenko, S.P.; Gere, J.M. 1961: Theory of elastic stability. New York: McGraw-Hill

  26. Wolkowicz, H.; Saigal, R.; Vandenberghe, L. (eds.) 2000: Handbook of semidefinite programming, Vol. 27 of International Series in Operations Research & Management Science. Boston: Kluwer Academic

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Evgrafov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Evgrafov, A. On globally stable singular truss topologies. Struct Multidisc Optim 29, 170–177 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-004-0428-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-004-0428-6

Keywords

Navigation