Skip to main content
Log in

Antichains of perfect and splitting trees

  • Published:
Archive for Mathematical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigate uncountable maximal antichains of perfect trees and of splitting trees. We show that in the case of perfect trees they must have size of at least the dominating number, whereas for splitting trees they are of size at least \(\mathsf {cov}(\mathcal {M})\), i.e. the covering coefficient of the meager ideal. Finally, we show that uncountable maximal antichains of superperfect trees are at least of size the bounding number; moreover we show that this is best possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blass, A.: Combinatorial cardinal characteristics of the continuum. In: Foreman, M., Kanamori, A. (eds.) Handbook of Set Theory, pp. 395–489. Springer, Berlin (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Goldstern, M., Repický, M., Shelah, S., Spinas, O.: On tree ideals. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 123(5), 1573–1581 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Jech, T.: Set Theory: The Third Millennium Edition, Revised and Expanded. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer, Berlin (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Judah, H., Miller, A.W., Shelah, S.: Sacks forcing, Laver forcing, and Martin’s axiom. Arch. Math. Logic 31(3), 145–161 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Jossen, S., Spinas, O.: A two-dimensional tree ideal. In: Logic Colloquium 2000. Lecture Notes in Logic 19, pp. 294–322. ALS (2005)

  6. Kechris, A.S.: On a notion of smallness for subsets of the Baire space. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 229, 191–207 (1977)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Kunen, K.: Set Theory: An Introduction to Independence Proofs. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1980)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Monk, J.D., Koppelberg, S., Bonnet, R.: Handbook of Boolean Algebras: General Theory of Boolean Algebras. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rosłanowski, A., Shelah, S.: More forcing notions imply diamond. Arch. Math. Logic 35(5), 299–313 (1996)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Saint-Raymond, J.: Approximation des sous-ensembles analytiques par l’intérieur. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. AB 281, A85–A87 (1975)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Shelah, S.: Vive la différence I: nonisomorphism of ultrapowers of countable models. In: Judah, H., Just, W., Woodin, H. (eds.) Set Theory of the Continuum, pp. 357–405. Springer, Berlin (1992)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Simon, P.: Sacks forcing collapses c to b. Comment. Math. Univ. Carol. 34(4), 707–710 (1993)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Spinas, O.: Analytic countably splitting families. J. Symb. Logic 69, 101–117 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Spinas, O.: Splitting squares. Isr. J. Math. 162(1), 57–73 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Spinas, O.: Silver trees and Cohen reals. Isr. J. Math. 211(1), 473–480 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Spinas, O.: Generic trees. J. Symb. Logic 60(3), 705–726 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Spinas, O.: Partition numbers. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 90(1), 243–262 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Shelah, S., Spinas, O.: Different cofinalities of tree ideals. Submitted (2017)

  19. Spinas, O., Wyszkowski, M.: Silver antichains. J. Symb. Logic 80(2), 503–519 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Otmar Spinas.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The authors would like to thank the DFG for partial support (Grant SP683/4-1).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hein, P., Spinas, O. Antichains of perfect and splitting trees. Arch. Math. Logic 59, 367–388 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-019-00694-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-019-00694-7

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation