Skip to main content
Log in

The capabilities approach and variety engineering. A case for social cocreation of value

  • Original Article
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to show an application of variety engineering in the social realm (Beer in The heart of enterprise. Wiley, Chichester, 1979, in Brain of the firm. Wiley, Chichester 1981, in diagnosing the system for organizations. Wiley, Chichester, 1985). It focuses on reducing environmental complexity by catalysing self-organizing processes (Espejo and Reyes in Organizational systems: managing complexity with the VSM. Springer, London, 2011). This catalysis is based on the use of Sen and Nussbaum’s capabilities approach (Sen in Development as freedom. Oxford University Press, New York, 1999; Nusbaum in Women and human development: the capabilities approach. Cambridge University Press, New York, 2000). By doing this an organization may improve the quality of the relations with their clients by transforming environmental agents into new suppliers. This approach opens a new dimension of social responsibility for organizations. A particular case is presented in which a regional university in Colombia faces the challenge of attending low-income students coming from small municipalities. They designed a strategy to offer low-cost housing and a daily balanced meal without using the university's own resources. Instead, they managed to involve some agents of the community by developing their capabilities. This kind of variety engineering shows the possibility of new forms of social responsibility in universities by incorporating the capabilities approach into their managerial practices. This is something that is currently under study in other universities (Boni et al. in Science and engineering ethics. Springer, London, 2015).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashby WR (1964) An introduction to cybernetics. Methuen, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Beer S (1979) The heart of enterprise. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer S (1981) Brain of the firm. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer S (1985) Diagnosing the system for organizations. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer S (1989) National government: disseminated regulation in real time, or how to run a country. In: Espejo R, Harnden R (eds) The viable system model: interpretations and applications of Stafford Beer's VSM. Wiley, Chichester

  • Boni A, Sastre J, Calabuig C (2015) Educating engineers for the public good through international internships: evidence from a case study at Universitat Politécnica de Valencia. In: Bird S, Spier R (eds) Science and engineering ethics. Springer, London

  • Espejo R (2015) An enterprise complexity model: variety engineering and dynamic capabilities. Int J Syst Soc 2:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espejo R, Dominici G (2016) Cybernetics of value cocreation for product development. Syst Res Behav Sci 34:24–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espejo R, Reyes A (2011) Organizational systems: managing complexity with the VSM. Springer, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Espejo R, Watt J (1988) Information management, organization and managerial effectiveness. J Oper Res Soc 39(1):7–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espejo R (1989) The VSM revisited. In: Espejo R, Harnden R (eds) The viable system model: interpretations and applications of Stafford Beer's VSM. Wiley, Chichester

  • Flores F (1982) Management and communication in the office of the future. Dissertation, Stanford University

  • Giddens A (1984) The constitution of society. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Heims S (1993) Constructing a social science for postwar America: the cybernetics group, 1946–1953. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum M (2000) Women and human development: the capabilities approach. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Porter M, Kramer M (2011) Creating shared value. Harvard Bus Rev 89(1/2):62–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyes A (2018) Connecting higher education and innovation to local development. Futures Spec Issue Interact Revolut 103:73–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (1999) Development as freedom. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (1980) Equality of what? In: McMurrin S (ed) Tanner lectures on human values, vol 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Von Foerster H (1984) Observing systems, 2nd edn. Intersystems Publications, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker R (1992) Venues for contexture: a critical analysis and enactive reformulation of group decision support systems. In: Research report UMADP-RRIPCS. Department of Administrative Data Processing/Informatics. Umea University, Umea

  • Wiener N (1951) The human use of human beings: cybernetics and society. Eyre and Spottiswoode, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alfonso Reyes Alvarado.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alvarado, A.R. The capabilities approach and variety engineering. A case for social cocreation of value. AI & Soc 37, 1269–1277 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01353-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01353-3

Keywords

Navigation