Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

From industry 4.0 to society 4.0, there and back

  • Open Forum
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The new industrial paradigm Industry 4.0, or smart industry, is at the core of contemporary debates. The public debate on Industry 4.0 typically offers two main perspectives: the technological one and the one about industrial policies. On the contrary, the discussion on the social and organizational effects of the new paradigm is still underdeveloped. The article specifically examines this aspect, and analyzes the change that workers are subject to, along with the work organization, smart digital factories. The study originates from an empirical survey conducted by the author together with a multidisciplinary research group between 2014 and 2015 in some of the largest Italian factories.

In particular, the article analyzes the links between digital society, digital culture and Industry 4.0, focusing on the issue of people’s participation in the process of change, within a specific case study from the railway sector.

Many elements of the Industry 4.0 paradigm are widespread outside the factory, in society; they are not only technological elements but also cultural. One of the key aspects of the analysis is the question of participation and the “person-centered” culture. The subject is addressed critically by presenting both the RE-personalization processes (from the centrality of the users–consumers in consumption practices to the centrality of the worker in the work paradigm 4.0) and the new processes of DE personalization caused by digital automation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arand K, Zeeman L, Scholes J, Morales AS (2012) The resilient subject: exploring subjectivity, identity and the body in narratives of resilience. Health 16(5):548–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson W (2010) Class, individualization and late modernity: in search of the reflexive worker. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beck U (1992) Risk society: towards a new modernity. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck U, Giddens A, Lash S (1994) Reflexive modernization. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower JL, Christensen CM (1995) Disruptive technologies: catching the wave. Harvard Bus Rev 73(1):43–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells M (1997) The power of identity. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherns A (1976) The principles of sociotechnical design. Hum Relat 29(8):783–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dore R (1987) Taking Japan seriously. StanfordUniversity Press, Palo Alto

    Google Scholar 

  • Dujarier MA (2008) Le travail du consommateur. La Découverte, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2010) Factories of the future PPP. strategic multi-annual roadmap. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

  • European Commission (2013) Factories of the future: Multi-annual roadmap for the contractual PPP under Horizon 2020. Luxembourg

  • Germany’s Federal Government (2014) The new high-tech strategy innovations for Germany. BMBF, Berlin

  • Germany’s Federal Ministry of Education and Research (2010) Ideas. Innovation. Prosperity. High-tech strategy 2020 for Germany. BMBF, Berlin

  • Gouvernemente Française (2015) Industrie du futur. Réunir la Nouvelle France Industrielle

  • Governo italiano, Ministero dello sviluppo economico (2016) Piano Nazionale Industria 4.0. Ministero dello sviluppo economico, Roma

  • Huws U (2016) Platform labour: sharing economy or virtual wild West? J Progres Econ:24–27

  • Jenkins H (2006) Convergence culture: where old and new media collide. New York University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler P (1989) From mass marketing to mass customization. Plan Rev 17(5):10–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A (2007) From mass customization to mass personalization: a strategic transformation. Int J Flex Manuf Syst 19:533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee MK, Kusbit D, Metsky E, Dabbish L (2015) Working with machines: the impact of algorithmic and data-driven management on human workers. In: CHI 2015, proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM, New York, pp 1603–1612

  • Magone A, Mazali T (eds) (2016) Industria 4.0. Uomini e macchine nella fabbrica digitale. Guerini e Associati, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  • Manovich L (2001) The language of new media. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Manovich L (2009) The practice of everyday (media) life: from mass consumption to mass cultural production? Crit Inq 35(2):319–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middlemiss L (2014) Individualised or participatory? Exploring late-modern identity and sustainable development. Environ Polit 23(6):929–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford E (2003) Redesigning human systems. Idea Group, Hershey

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Petrick IJ, Simpson TW (2013) 3D printing disrupts manufacturing: how economies of one create new rules of competition. Res Technol Manag 56:12–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay H (1977) Cycles of control: worker participation in sociological and historical perspective. Sociology 11(3):481–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz T (ed) (2013) Digital labor. The internet as playground and factory. Routledge, NewYork

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett R (1998) The corrosion of character: the personal consequences of work in the new capitalism. Norton & Co, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett R (2008) The craftsman. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstone R (ed) (2005) Media, technology and everyday life in Europe. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstone R, Hirsch E (eds) (1992) Consuming technologies, media and information in domestic spaces. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner C, Dixon W (2012) Automate this: how algorithms came to rule our world. Portfolio, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Toffler A (1980) The third wave. William Morrow & Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseng MM, Hu SJ (2014) Mass customization. CIRP Encycl Prod Eng:836–843

  • Wellman B (2011) Community networks online. In: Keeble L (ed) The rise of networked individualism. Taylor & Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Womack JP, Jones DT, Roos D (1990) The machine that change the world: the story of lean production. Simon & Schuster, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The results presented in this article are part of an empirical research conducted by the research center Torino Nord Ovest, between January 2014 and December 2015, commissioned by IAL Nazionale, FIM CISL Piemonte, Istituto Superiore Mario Boella and also financed with the support of the Fondo Fapi. This research could not be conducted without the help of various managers in production, engineering, innovation, human resources and industrial relationships who have welcomed us to their plants and guided us through them giving us in-depth explanations of the processes.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tatiana Mazali.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mazali, T. From industry 4.0 to society 4.0, there and back. AI & Soc 33, 405–411 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0792-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0792-6

Keywords

Navigation