Skip to main content
Log in

Machine humour: examples from Turing test experiments

  • Open Forum
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we look at the possibility of a machine having a sense of humour. In particular, we focus on actual machine utterances in Turing test discourses. In doing so, we do not consider the Turing test in depth and what this might mean for humanity, rather we merely look at cases in conversations when the output from a machine can be considered to be humorous. We link such outpourings with Turing’s “arguments from various disabilities” used against the concept of a machine being able to think, taken from his seminal work of 1950. Finally we consider the role that humour might play in adding to the deception, integral to the Turing test, that a machine in practice appears to be a human.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Harjit Mehroke for a; C.D. Chapman for b

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Katib M (1999) Joke-telling in Jordanian society: a sociolinguistic perspective. Humor Int J Humor Res 12(3):261–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Attardo S (2001) Humorous texts: a semantic and pragmatic analysis. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin/New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett D (2012) Artificial intelligence, I’ll say why computers can’t joke? http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2012-03-23/artificial-intelligence-ill-say-dot-why-computers-cant-joke

  • Benton G (1988) The origins of political jokes. In: Powell C et al (eds) Humor in society: resistance and control. St. Martin’s Press, New York, pp 33–55

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Binstead K (1996) Machine humour: an implemented model of puns. PhD Thesis, Edinburgh University

  • Boden M (1998) Creativity and artificial intelligence. Artif Intell 103(1–2):347–356

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland B (2004) The essential Turing—the ideas that gave birth to the computer age. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bruyn P (1989) My grandfather the hunter: a humorous translation from Afrikaans to English. Meta 34:79–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennett D (1997) Kinds of minds: toward an understanding of consciousness. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dybala P, Ptaszynski M, Higuchi S, Rzepka R, Araki K (2010) Multiagent system for joke generation: humour and emotions combined in human-agent conversation. J Ambient Intell Smart Environ 2(1):31–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Dybala P, Ptaszynski M, Higuchi S, Rzepka R, Araki K (2008) Humor prevails!—implementing a joke generator into a conversational system. In: Proceedings of AI 2008 advances in artificial intelligence, vol 5360, LNCS, pp 214–225

  • Farghal M (2006) Accidental humour in international public notices displayed in English. J Intercult Commun (12)

  • Fowler H, Fowler F (eds) (1995) The concise Oxford dictionary of current English, 9th edn. Clarendon Press, Oxford, p. 486

  • Grice H (1975) Logic and conversation. In: Cole P, Morgan JL (eds) Speech acts. Academic Press, New York, pp 41–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Moor J (2003) The status and future of the Turing test. In: Moor JH (ed) The Turing test—the Elusive standard of artificial intelligence. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 197–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose R (1994) Shadows of the mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickman P (1999) The philosopher as joker. Philos Now 25:10–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie G, Manurung R, Pain H, Waller A, Black R, O’Mara D (2007) A practical application of computational humour. In: Proceedings of computational creativity, pp 91–98

  • Shah H (2010) Deception detection and machine intelligence in practical Turing tests. PhD thesis, The University of Reading

  • Shah H, Henry O (2005) Confederate effect in human-machine textual interaction. In: Proceedings of 5th WSEAS int. conf. on information science, communications and applications (WSEAS ISCA), Cancun, Mexico, ISBN: 960-8457-22-X, pp 109–114, 11–14 May 2005

  • Shah H, Warwick K, Bland I, Chapman C, Allen M (2012) Turing’s imitation game: role of error-making in intelligent thought. Turing in Context II, Brussels, 10-12 October, pp 31–32, 2012. http://www.computing-conference.ugent.be/file/14. Presentation available here: http://www.academia.edu/1916866/Turings_Imitation_Game_Role_of_Error-making_in_Intelligent_Thought

  • Shah H, Warwick K, Carpenter R, (2008) Can a machine tell a joke?. In: Proceedings of European conference on computing and philosophy, Montpellier, June 2008

  • Shah H, Warwick K (2010) Testing Turing’s five-minutes, parallel-paired imitation game. Kybernetes 39(3):449–465

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shah H, Warwick K, Vallverdu J, Wu D (2016) Can machines talk? Comparison of Eliza with modern conversation systems. Comput Hum Behav 58:278–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith P (1991) The joke machine: communicating traditional humour using computers. In: Bennett G (ed) Spoken in jest. University of Sheffield Press, Sheffield

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterrett S (2003) Turing’s two tests for intelligence. In: Moor J (ed) The Turing test—the Elusive standard of artificial intelligence. The Netherlands, Kluwer, pp 79–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson A (ed) (2010) Oxford dictionary of English. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Turing A (1950) Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind LIX(236):433–460

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Warwick K (2011) Artificial intelligence: the basics. Routledge, Abingdon

    Google Scholar 

  • Warwick K (2012) Not another look at the Turing Test!. In: Bielikova M, Friedrich G, Gottlob G, Katzenbeisser S, Turan G (eds.) Proceedings of SOFSEM 2012: theory and practice of computer science (Lecture notes in computer science), vol 7147. Springer, pp 130–140

  • Warwick K, Shah H (2016a) Turing’s imitation game: conversations with the unknown. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Warwick K, Shah H (2014a) Good machine performance in practical Turing tests. IEEE Trans Comput Intell AI Games 6(3):289–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warwick K, Shah H (2014b) Assumption of knowledge and the Chinese room in Turing test interrogation. AI commun 27(3):275–283

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Warwick K, Shah H (2015a) Can machines think? A report on Turing test experiments at the royal society. J Exp Theor Artif Intell. doi:10.1080/0952813X.2015.1055826

    Google Scholar 

  • Warwick K, Shah H (2015b) Human misidentification in Turing tests. J Exp Theor Artif Intell 27(2):123–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warwick K, Shah H (2016b) Effects of lying in practical turing tests. AI & Soc 31(1):5–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warwick K, Shah H (2016c) The importance of a human viewpoint on computer natural language capabilities: a Turing test perspective. AI & Soc 31(2):207–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warwick K, Shah H, Moor J (2013) Some implications of a sample of practical Turing tests. Mind Mach 23:163–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin Warwick.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shah, H., Warwick, K. Machine humour: examples from Turing test experiments. AI & Soc 32, 553–561 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-016-0669-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-016-0669-0

Keywords

Navigation