Literatur
Bauer RM, Grabbert MT, Klehr B et al (2017) 36-month data for the AdVance XP((R)) male sling: results of a prospective multicentre study. BJU Int 119(4):626–630
Van der Aa F, Drake MJ, Kasyan GR et al (2013) The artificial urinary sphincter after a quarter of a century: a critical systematic review of its use in male non-neurogenic incontinence. Eur Urol 63(4):681–689
Tutolo M, Cornu JN, Bauer RM et al (2019) Efficacy and safety of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS): Results of a large multi-institutional cohort of patients with mid-term follow-up. Neurourol Urodyn 38(2):710–718
Grabbert M, Hüsch T, Kretschmer A et al (2018) Comparison of adjustable male slings and artificial urinary sphincter in the treatment of male urinary incontinence: a retrospective analysis of patient selection and postoperative continence status. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2523-0
McGeady JB, McAninch JW, Truesdale MD et al (2014) Artificial urinary sphincter placement in compromised urethras and survival: a comparison of virgin, radiated and reoperative cases. J Urol 192(6):1756–1761
Hoy NY, Rourke KF (2015) Artificial urinary sphincter outcomes in the “fragile urethra”. Urology 86(3):618–624
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Interessenkonflikt
R.M. Bauer: Beratungstätigkeit, Vorträge sowie Beteiligung an klinischen Studient für Boston Scientfic (Marlborough, Massachusetts, USA) sowie Promedon (Cordoba, Argentinien). M. Grabbert gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grabbert, M., Bauer, R.M. Prospektive Analyse der Ergebnisse und Komplikationen des künstlichen Schließmuskels (AMS 800) nach vorheriger Mundschleimhautplastik. Urologe 58, 929–930 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-019-0976-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-019-0976-4