Zusammenfassung
Neue Ansätze der Nutzung künstlicher Intelligenz (KI) zur Analyse von Daten aus der Neurobildgebung, aber auch passiv gesammelter Daten von sog. „Wearables“ wie Smartphones oder Smartwatches sowie Daten, die sich aus Social-Media- und anderen Online-Aktivitäten extrahieren lassen, ermöglichen es bereits heute, kognitive Fähigkeiten, Persönlichkeitsmerkmale und psychische Erkrankungen vorherzusagen sowie akute mentale Zustände offenzulegen. In diesem Beitrag erläutern wir die Hintergründe der aktuellen Entwicklung, leuchten ihre Möglichkeiten und Grenzen aus und gehen auf ethische und gesellschaftliche Aspekte ein, die sich aus der Nutzung ergeben.
Abstract
New approaches to the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to analyze data from neuroimaging but also passively collected data from so-called wearables, such as smartphones or smartwatches, as well as data that can be extracted from social media and other online activities, already make it possible to predict cognitive abilities, personality traits, and mental illnesses, as well as to reveal acute mental states. In this article, we explain the methodological concepts behind these current developments, illuminate the possibilities and limitations, and address ethical and social aspects arising from the use.
Literatur
Barros C, Silva CA, Pinheiro AP (2021) Advanced EEG-based learning approaches to predict schizophrenia: promises and pitfalls. Artif Intell Med 114:102039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2021.102039
Beauchamp TL, Childress JF (2019) Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Begley K, Begley C, Smith V (2021) Shared decision-making and maternity care in the deep learning age: acknowledging and overcoming inherited defeaters. J Eval Clin Pract 27:497–503. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13515
Bzdok D, Ioannidis JPA (2019) Exploration, inference, and prediction in neuroscience and biomedicine. Trends Neurosci 42:251–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2019.02.001
Chen J, Patil KR, Weis S et al (2020) Neurobiological divergence of the positive and negative schizophrenia subtypes identified on a new factor structure of psychopathology using non-negative factorization: an international machine learning study. Biol Psychiatry 87:282–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.08.031
Cole JH, Franke K (2017) Predicting age using neuroimaging: innovative brain ageing biomarkers. Trends Neurosci 40:681–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2017.10.001
Dwyer DB, Falkai P, Koutsouleris N (2018) Machine learning approaches for clinical psychology and psychiatry. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 14:91–118. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045037
Eickhoff SB, Langner R (2019) Neuroimaging-based prediction of mental traits: road to utopia or orwell? PLoS Biol 17:e3000497. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000497
Esteva A, Kuprel B, Novoa RA et al (2017) Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature 542:115–118. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21056
Farah MJ (2002) Emerging ethical issues in neuroscience. Nat Neurosci 5:1123–1129. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1102-1123
Flint C, Cearns M, Opel N et al (2021) Systematic misestimation of machine learning performance in neuroimaging studies of depression. Neuropsychopharmacology 46:1510–1517. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-021-01020-7
Gabrieli JDE, Ghosh SS, Whitfield-Gabrieli S (2015) Prediction as a humanitarian and pragmatic contribution from human cognitive neuroscience. Neuron 85:11–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.047
Gerke S, Minssen T, Cohen G (2020) Ethical and legal challenges of artificial intelligence-driven healthcare. Artificial intelligence in healthcare. Elsevier, , S 295–336
Gordon L, Grantcharov T, Rudzicz F (2019) Explainable artificial intelligence for safe Intraoperative decision support. JAMA Surg 154:1064–1065. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.2821
Greely HT, Ramos KM, Grady C (2016) Neuroethics in the age of brain projects. Neuron 92:637–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.10.048
Hedderich DM, Eickhoff SB (2021) Machine learning for psychiatry: getting doctors at the black box? Mol Psychiatry 26:23–25. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-020-00931-z
Heinrichs B (2021) Discrimination in the age of artificial intelligence. Ai Soc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01192-2
Heinrichs B, Eickhoff SB (2020) Your evidence? Machine learning algorithms for medical diagnosis and prediction. Hum Brain Mapp 41:1435–1444. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24886
Kim H, Lee S, Lee S et al (2019) Depression prediction by using ecological momentary assessment, actiwatch data, and machine learning: observational study on older adults living alone. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 7:e14149. https://doi.org/10.2196/14149
Matthias A (2004) The responsibility gap: ascribing responsibility for the actions of learning automata. Ethics Inf Technol 6:175–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-004-3422-1
Narla A, Kuprel B, Sarin K et al (2018) Automated classification of skin lesions: from pixels to practice. J Invest Dermatol 138:2108–2110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2018.06.175
Nostro AD, Müller VI, Varikuti DP et al (2018) Predicting personality from network-based resting-state functional connectivity. Brain Struct Funct 223:2699–2719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-018-1651-z
Obermeyer Z, Powers B, Vogeli C, Mullainathan S (2019) Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science 366:447–453. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax2342
Poldrack RA, Monahan J, Imrey PB et al (2018) Predicting violent behavior: what can neuroscience add? Trends Cogn Sci 22:111–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.11.003
Propping P, Aretz S, Schumacher J et al (2006) Prädiktive genetische Testverfahren. Naturwissenschaftliche, rechtliche und ethische Aspekte. Alber, Freiburg
Rosenberg MD, Scheinost D, Greene AS et al (2020) Functional connectivity predicts changes in attention observed across minutes, days, and months. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 117:3797–3807. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912226117
Scheinost D, Noble S, Horien C et al (2019) Ten simple rules for predictive modeling of individual differences in neuroimaging. Neuroimage 193:35–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.02.057
Tavani HT (2004) Genomic research and data-mining technology: implications for personal privacy and informed consent. Ethics Inf Technol 6:15–28. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:etin.0000036156.77169.31
Varoquaux G (2018) Cross-validation failure: small sample sizes lead to large error bars. Neuroimage 180:68–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.061
Woo C‑W, Chang LJ, Lindquist MA, Wager TD (2017) Building better biomarkers: brain models in translational neuroimaging. Nat Neurosci 20:365–377. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4478
Wittgenstein L (1984) Tractatus logico-philosophicus / Tagebücher 1914–1916 / Philosophische Untersuchungen. Werkausgabe Bd. 1. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Interessenkonflikt
S.B. Eickhoff und B. Heinrichs geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autoren keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.
Additional information
QR-Code scannen & Beitrag online lesen
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eickhoff, S.B., Heinrichs, B. Der vorhersagbare Mensch. Nervenarzt 92, 1140–1148 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-021-01197-8
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-021-01197-8