Skip to main content
Log in

Conspicuous and aposematic spines in the animal kingdom

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Naturwissenschaften Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spines serve as a common physical defence mechanism in both the plant and animal kingdoms. Here we argue that as in plants, defensive animal spines are often conspicuous (shape and colour) and should be considered aposematic. Conspicuous spines may evolve as signals or serve as a cue for potential predators. Spine conspicuousness in animals has evolved independently across and within phyla occupying aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, indicating that this convergent phenomenon is highly adaptive. Still, many spines are cryptic, suggesting that conspicuity is not simply constrained by developmental factors such as differences in the chemical composition of the integument. Aposematism does not preclude the signalling role of conspicuous spines in the sexual arena.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Borror DJ, Triplehorn CA, Johnson NF (1989) An introduction to the study of insects. 6th edn. Saunders College, Pa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers DM (1993) Aposematic caterpillars: life-styles of the warningly colored and unpalatable. In: Stamp NE, Casey TM (eds) Caterpillars: ecological and evolutionary constraints on foraging. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 331–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Chernova OF, Kuznetsov GV (2001) Structural features of spines in some rodents (Rodentia: Myomorpha, Hystricomorpha). Biol Bull 28:371–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Cogger HG, Zweifel RG, Kirshner D (1998) Encyclopedia of reptiles and amphibians. 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cott HB (1940) Adaptive coloration in animals. Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmunds M (1974) Defence in animals: a survey of anti-predator defences. Longman, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  • George DJ, George JJ (1979) Marine life: an illustrated encyclopaedia of invertebrates in the sea. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Golani D, Darom D (1999) Handbook of the fishes of Israel. Keter, Jerusalem

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford T (1990) The evolution of aposematism. In: Evans DL, Schmidt JO (eds) Insect defenses. State University of New York Press, Albany, N.Y., pp 23–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Komárek S (1998) Mimicry, aposematism and related phenomena in animals and plants: bibliography 1800–1990. Vesmir, Prague

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamprell K, Healy JM (1998) Bivalves of Australia, vol 2. Backhuys, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Lev-Yadun S (2001) Aposematic (warning) coloration associated with thorns in higher plants. J Theor Biol 210:385–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lev-Yadun S (2003) Weapon (thorn) automimicry and mimicry of aposematic colorful thorns in plants. J Theor Biol 224:183–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindquist N, Hay ME (1996) Palatability and chemical defense of marine invertebrate larvae. Ecol Monogr 66:431–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallet J, Joron M (1999) Evolution of diversity in warning color and mimicry: polymorphism, shifting balance, and speciation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 30:201–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith JM, Harper D (2003) Animal signals. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Rentz DC (1996) Grasshopper country: the abundant orthopteroid insects of Australia. University of New South Wales Press, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild M (1972) Secondary plant substances and warning coloration in insects. In: Van Emden HF (ed) Insect plant relationships. Symposium of the Royal Entomological Society no. 6. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 59–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith MM, Heemstra PC (1986) Smiths’ sea fishes. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stix H, Stix M, Abbott RT (1968) The shell: five hundred million years of inspired design. Abrams, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zug GR, Vitt L, Caldwell J (2001) Herpetology: an introductory biology of amphibians and reptiles, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Prof. M. Goren, A. Shlagman (Tel Aviv University) and two anonymous referees for their valuable comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moshe Inbar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Inbar, M., Lev-Yadun, S. Conspicuous and aposematic spines in the animal kingdom. Naturwissenschaften 92, 170–172 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-005-0608-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-005-0608-2

Keywords

Navigation