Skip to main content
Log in

Protonentherapie – Eine Chance in der Therapie von Kopf-Hals- und Schädelbasistumoren

Proton therapy—a chance in the treatment of tumors of the head and neck and base of skull

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
HNO Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Die Radiotherapie (RT) ist integraler Bestandteil der Behandlung vieler Tumoren in der Nachbarschaft empfindlicher Organe und Strukturen, zu denen insbesondere auch Kopf-Hals- und Schädelbasistumoren zählen. Aufgrund der mit einer Strahlentherapie verbundenen Risiken von Nebenwirkungen wird die Nutzung hochkonformaler RT-Techniken favorisiert. Für viele Indikationen ist daher die Protonentherapie (PT) bereits Teil des modernen Behandlungsstandards.

Ziel der Arbeit

Übersicht über heutige Indikationen für PT mit Schwerpunkt auf Tumoren im Kopf-Hals-Bereich und der Schädelbasis. Zusammenfassung und Diskussion relevanter Ergebnisse und aktueller Entwicklungen.

Material und Methoden

Bewertung relevanter Studien und Zusammenschau aktueller Fragestellungen der PT für Tumoren im Kopf-Hals- und Schädelbasisbereich.

Ergebnisse

Die Untersuchungen zur PT weisen insgesamt vielversprechende Ergebnisse auf. Neben den dosimetrischen Untersuchungen deuten auch klinische Studien auf Vorteile der PT hin, besonders hinsichtlich der Reduzierung von Nebenwirkungen.

Diskussion

Gegenwärtig wird besonders die Nutzung des „model-based approach“ diskutiert. Hierdurch sollen anhand der „normal tissue complication probability“ (NTCP) die Patienten identifiziert werden, die besonders von einer PT profitieren. Weiterhin wird die PT für die Re-RT diskutiert.

Abstract

Background

Radiotherapy (RT) is an integral part of the treatment of many tumors located in the vicinity of sensitive organs and structures, including tumors of the head and neck and base of skull in particular. Due to the risk of side effects associated with RT, the use of highly conformal RT techniques is favored. For many indications, proton therapy (PT) is therefore already part of the modern treatment standard.

Objective

This article presents an overview of current indications for PT with emphasis on tumors in the head and neck region and the base of skull. Furthermore, a summary and discussion of relevant results and current developments are included.

Materials and methods

The work comprises an evaluation of relevant studies and an overview of current issues related to PT of tumors in the areas of the head, neck, and base of skull.

Results

Overall, the studies on PT show promising results. In addition to dosimetric studies, clinical studies also point to advantages of PT, especially with regard to the reduction of side effects.

Discussion

Currently, use of the model-based approach is being discussed. This is intended to identify those patients who benefit most from PT based on the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP). PT for re-RT is also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5

Literatur

  1. Behrends C, Haussmann J, Kramer PH et al (2020) Model-based comparison of organ at risk protection between VMAT and robustly optimised IMPT plans. Z Med Phys. Under review

  2. Blanchard P, Garden AS, Gunn GB et al (2016) Intensity-modulated proton beam therapy (IMPT) versus intensity-modulated photon therapy (IMRT) for patients with oropharynx cancer—a case matched analysis. Radiother Oncol 120:48–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chaturvedi AK, Engels EA, Pfeiffer RM et al (2011) Human papillomavirus and rising oropharyngeal cancer incidence in the United States. J Clin Oncol 29:4294–4301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen YP, Chan ATC, Le QT et al (2019) Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Lancet 394:64–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dasgupta R, Fuchs J, Rodeberg D (2016) Rhabdomyosarcoma. Semin Pediatr Surg 25:276–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Deutsche Gesellschaft Für Radioonkologie (2019) Stellungnahme zur Strahlentherapie mit Protonen in Deutschland Juni 2019. https://www.degro.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/201907_StellungnahmeProtonen_final.pdf. Zugegriffen: 16. Dez. 2019

  7. Doyen J, Jazmati D, Geismar D et al (2019) Outcome and patterns of relapse in childhood parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma treated with proton beam therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 105:1043–1054

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fung V, Calugaru V, Bolle S et al (2018) Proton beam therapy for skull base chordomas in 106 patients: a dose adaptive radiation protocol. Radiother Oncol 128:198–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Garneau JC, Bakst RL, Miles BA (2018) Hypopharyngeal cancer: a state of the art review. Oral Oncol 86:244–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Habib A (2018) Management of advanced hypopharyngeal carcinoma: systematic review of survival following surgical and non-surgical treatments. J Laryngol Otol 132:385–400

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Holliday EB, Garden AS, Rosenthal DI et al (2015) Proton therapy reduces treatment-related toxicities for patients with nasopharyngeal cancer: a case-match control study of intensity-modulated proton therapy and intensity-modulated photon therapy. Int J Part Ther 2(1):19–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kontny U, Franzen S, Behrends U et al (2016) Diagnosis and treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in children and adolescents—recommendations of the GPOH-NPC study group. Klin Padiatr 228:105–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ladra MM, Edgington SK, Mahajan A et al (2014) A dosimetric comparison of proton and intensity modulated radiation therapy in pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma patients enrolled on a prospective phase II proton study. Radiother Oncol 113:77–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Langendijk JA, Lambin P, De Ruysscher D et al (2013) Selection of patients for radiotherapy with protons aiming at reduction of side effects: the model-based approach. Radiother Oncol 107:267–273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Leeman JE, Romesser PB, Zhou Y et al (2017) Proton therapy for head and neck cancer: expanding the therapeutic window. Lancet Oncol 18:e254–e265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lewis GD, Holliday EB, Kocak-Uzel E et al (2016) Intensity-modulated proton therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Decreased radiation dose to normal structures and encouraging clinical outcomes. Head Neck 38(Suppl 1):E1886–1895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lomax AJ, Bortfeld T, Goitein G et al (1999) A treatment planning inter-comparison of proton and intensity modulated photon radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 51:257–271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mcdonald MW, Zolali-Meybodi O, Lehnert SJ et al (2016) Reirradiation of recurrent and second primary head and neck cancer with proton therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 96:808–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mcmaster ML, Goldstein AM, Bromley CM et al (2001) Chordoma: incidence and survival patterns in the United States, 1973–1995. Cancer Causes Control 12:1–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mizumoto M, Murayama S, Akimoto T et al (2017) Long-term follow-up after proton beam therapy for pediatric tumors: a Japanese national survey. Cancer Sci 108:444–447

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mohan R, Grosshans D (2017) Proton therapy—present and future. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 109:26–44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Newhauser WD, Zhang R (2015) The physics of proton therapy. Phys Med Biol 60:R155–R209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Newman JR, Connolly TM, Illing EA et al (2015) Survival trends in hypopharyngeal cancer: a population-based review. Laryngoscope 125:624–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Particle Therapy Co-Operative Group (2018) Particle therapy patient statistics (per end of 2018). https://www.ptcog.ch/images/patientstatistics/Patientstatistics-updateDec2018.pdf. Zugegriffen: 12. Juli 2019

  25. Patel SH, Wang Z, Wong WW et al (2014) Charged particle therapy versus photon therapy for paranasal sinus and nasal cavity malignant diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 15:1027–1038

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rombi B, Ares C, Hug EB et al (2013) Spot-scanning proton radiation therapy for pediatric chordoma and chondrosarcoma: clinical outcome of 26 patients treated at paul scherrer institute. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 86:578–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Romesser PB, Cahlon O, Scher ED et al (2016) Proton beam reirradiation for recurrent head and neck cancer: multi-institutional report on feasibility and early outcomes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 95:386–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Russo AL, Adams JA, Weyman EA et al (2016) Long-term outcomes after proton beam therapy for sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 95:368–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sio TT, Lin HK, Shi Q et al (2016) Intensity modulated proton therapy versus intensity modulated photon radiation therapy for oropharyngeal cancer: first comparative results of patient-reported outcomes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 95:1107–1114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Stiller CA, Trama A, Serraino D et al (2013) Descriptive epidemiology of sarcomas in Europe: report from the RARECARE project. Eur J Cancer 49:684–695

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Timmermann B (2010) Proton beam therapy for childhood malignancies: status report. Klin Padiatr 222:127–133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Turner JH, Reh DD (2012) Incidence and survival in patients with sinonasal cancer: a historical analysis of population-based data. Head Neck 34:877–885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Uezono H, Indelicato DJ, Rotondo RL et al (2019) Proton therapy following induction chemotherapy for pediatric and adolescent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 66:e27990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Verma V, Simone CB 2nd, Mishra MV (2018) Quality of life and patient-reported outcomes following proton radiation therapy: a systematic review. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 110:341–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Weber DC, Murray F, Combescure C et al (2018) Long term outcome of skull-base chondrosarcoma patients treated with high-dose proton therapy with or without conventional radiation therapy. Radiother Oncol 129:520–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wilson RR (1946) Radiological use of fast protons. Radiology 47:487–491

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Danksagung

Die Autorin dankt Frau R. Frakulli, Frau C. Behrends und Frau T. Steinmeier für die Hilfe beim Erstellen des Manuskriptes und des Bildmaterials.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beate Timmermann.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

B. Timmermann gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autoren keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Timmermann, B. Protonentherapie – Eine Chance in der Therapie von Kopf-Hals- und Schädelbasistumoren . HNO 68, 640–647 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-020-00915-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-020-00915-z

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation