Abstract
Background
Early enoxaparin 30 mg BID administration at 24 h post-injury has been demonstrated in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). However this dose can also yield subtherapeutic anti-Xa levels in 30–50% of trauma patients, suggesting that larger doses may be required for adequate prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism (VTE). The safety of enoxaparin 40 mg BID in trauma patients has previously been shown – however, these studies have largely excluded TBI patients. Therefore, we sought to demonstrate the safety of early enoxaparin 40 mg BID in a low-risk group of TBI patients.
Methods
A retrospective review of TBI patients at a Level 1 trauma center was performed. Patients with stable computed tomography (CT) of the head at 6 to 24 h post-injury who received enoxaparin 40 mg BID were included and serial GCS evaluations to identify possible clinical complications. To evaluate the safety of this dosing regimen, data was then compared to patients from our institution with similar TBI profiles who had received 5,000 units (U) of subcutaneous heparin (SQH) prophylaxis.
Results
199 TBI patients were identified over a nine month period, 40/199 (19.7%) received DVT prophylaxis after traumatic injury. Of these 40, 19 (47.5%) received enoxaparin 40 mg BID and 21 (52.5%) received 5,000U of SQH. Low risk TBI patients who were either given enoxaparin (n = 7) or SQH (n = 4), demonstrated no clinical decline in mental status during their inpatient stay.
Conclusion
Prior studies have demonstrated that enoxaparin 40 mg BID dosing is superior to traditional VTE prophylaxis in trauma patients. However, TBI patients are often excluded from this dosing due to concern for progression. Our study showed no clinical decline in mental status in a small cohort of low-risk TBI patients who received enoxaparin 40 mg BID.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Detailed data is available per request to the corresponding author.
References
Skrifvars MB, Bailey M, Presneill J, French C, Nichol A, Little L, Duranteau J, Huet O, Haddad S, Arabi Y, McArthur C, Cooper DJ, Bellomo R, EPO-TBI Investigators and the ANZICS Clinical Trials Group. Venous thromboembolic events in critically ill traumatic brain injury patients. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(3):419–28.
Samama MM, Cohen AT, Darmon JY, Desjardins L, Eldor A, Janbon C, Leizorovicz A, Nguyen H, Olsson CG, Turpie AG, Weisslinger N. A comparison of enoxaparin with placebo for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients. Prophylaxis in Medical Patients with Enoxaparin Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(11):793–800.
Selby R, Geerts W, Ofosu FA, Craven S, Dewar L, Phillips A, Szalai JP. Hypercoagulability after trauma: hemostatic changes and relationship to venous thromboembolism. Thromb Res. 2009;124(3):281–7.
Geerts WH, Code KI, Jay RM, Chen E, Szalai JP. A prospective study of venous thromboembolism after major trauma. N Engl J Med. 1994;331(24):1601–6.
Saadi R, Brandt K, Madlinger R, Nerenberg SF. Assessment of the use of pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in post-traumatic brain injury patients. J Pharm Pract. 2021;34(6):864–9.
Walker CK, Sandmann EA, Horyna TJ, Gales MA. Increased enoxaparin dosing for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in general trauma patients. Ann Pharmacother. 2017;51(4):323–31.
Thier ZT, Drake-Lavelle K, Prest PJ, Jones MA, Reeves JM, McClung-Smith CF, Goodwin TM, Villani N, Metz J, Jackson JB. Progression of intracranial hemorrhage after chemical prophylaxis using low-molecular-weight heparin in patients with traumatic brain injury. Am Surg. 2022;88(5):894–900.
Phelan HA. Venous thromboembolism after traumatic brain injury. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2013;39(5):541–8.
Farooqui A, Hiser B, Barnes SL, Litofsky NS. Safety and efficacy of early thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis after intracranial hemorrhage from traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2013;119(6):1576–82.
van Erp IA, Gaitanidis A, El Moheb M, Kaafarani HMA, Saillant N, Duhaime AC, Mendoza AE. Low-molecular-weight heparin versus unfractionated heparin in pediatric traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2021;27(4):469–74.
Benjamin E, Recinos G, Aiolfi A, Inaba K, Demetriades D. Pharmacological thromboembolic prophylaxis in traumatic brain injuries: low molecular weight heparin is superior to unfractionated heparin. Ann Surg. 2017;266(3):463–9.
Li S, Marks JA, Eisenstadt R, Kumasaka K, Samadi D, Johnson VE, Holena DN, Allen SR, Browne KD, Smith DH, Pascual JL. Enoxaparin ameliorates post-traumatic brain injury edema and neurologic recovery, reducing cerebral leukocyte endothelial interactions and vessel permeability in vivo. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;79(1):78–84.
Costantini TW, Min E, Box K, Tran V, Winfield RD, Fortlage D, Doucet J, Bansal V, Coimbra R. Dose adjusting enoxaparin is necessary to achieve adequate venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in trauma patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74(1):128–33 (discussion 134-5).
Malinoski D, Jafari F, Ewing T, Ardary C, Conniff H, Baje M, Kong A, Lekawa ME, Dolich MO, Cinat ME, Barrios C, Hoyt DB. Standard prophylactic enoxaparin dosing leads to inadequate anti-Xa levels and increased deep venous thrombosis rates in critically ill trauma and surgical patients. J Trauma. 2010;68(4):874–80.
Imran JB, Madni TD, Clark AT, Rizk P, Huang E, Minshall CT, Taveras LR, Cunningham HB, Eastman AL, Koshy JP, Kacir CD, Cripps MW. Inability to predict subprophylactic anti-factor Xa levels in trauma patients receiving early low-molecular-weight heparin. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018;85(5):867–72.
Ko A, Harada MY, Barmparas G, et al. Association between enoxaparin dosage adjusted by anti-factor Xa trough level and clinically evident venous thromboembolism after trauma. Jama Surg. 2016;15(11):1006–13.
Pastorek RA, Cripps MW, Bernstein IH, Scott WW, Madden CJ, Rickert KL, Wolf SE, Phelan HA. The Parkland Protocol’s modified Berne-Norwood criteria predict two tiers of risk for traumatic brain injury progression. J Neurotrauma. 2014;31(20):1737–43.
Phelan HA, Wolf SE, Norwood SH, Aldy K, Brakenridge SC, Eastman AL, Madden CJ, Nakonezny PA, Yang L, Chason DP, Arbique GM, Berne J, Minei JP. A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled pilot trial of anticoagulation in low-risk traumatic brain injury: the Delayed Versus Early Enoxaparin Prophylaxis I (DEEP I) study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(6):1434–41.
Kopelman TR, O’Neill PJ, Pieri PG, Salomone JP, Hall ST, Quan A, Wells JR, Pressman MS. Alternative dosing of prophylactic enoxaparin in the trauma patient: is more the answer? Am J Surg. 2013;206(6):911–5 (discussion 915-6).
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Literature review, data collection: YC, MS, MZ, ED, AF. Data analysis and writing: YC, MS, MZ, ED, BW, AF, MC, CP. Study design and data interpretation and critical revisions: YC, MS, MZ, BW, MC, CP.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Authors report no relevant disclosures or conflicts of interest.
Ethical statement
All human and animal studies have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Cho, YW., Scrushy, M., Zhu, M. et al. Early administration of high dose enoxaparin after traumatic brain injury. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 49, 2295–2303 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-023-02317-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-023-02317-6