Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Do self-reported data accurately measure health inequalities in risk factors for cardiovascular disease?

  • Original article
  • Published:
International Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to compare the magnitude of educational inequalities in self-reported and examination-based hypertension and hypercholesterolemia and to assess the impact of self-reported measurement error on health inequality indicators.

Methods

We used the Portuguese National Health Examination Survey data (n = 4911). The slope index of inequality (SII) and the relative index of inequality (RII) were used to determine the magnitude of absolute and relative education-related inequalities.

Results

Among the 25–49-year-old (yo) men, absolute and relative inequalities were smaller for self-reported than for examination-based hypertension (SIIeb = 0.18 vs. SIIsr = − 0.001, p < 0.001; RIIeb = 1.99 vs. RIIsr = 0.86, p = 0.031). For women, the relative inequalities were similar despite differences in self-reported and examination-based hypertension prevalence. For hypercholesterolemia, self-reported relative inequalities were larger than examination-based inequalities among the 50–74-yo men (RIIsr = 2.28 vs. RIIeb = 1.21, p = 0.004) and women (RIIsr = 1.22 vs. RIIeb= 0.87, p = 0.045), while no differences were observed among 25–49-yo.

Conclusions

Self-reported data underestimated educational inequalities among 25–49-yo men and overestimated them in older individuals. Inequality indicators derived from self-report should be interpreted with caution, and examination-based values should be preferred, when available.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Portuguese National Health Examination Survey (INSEF) was developed as part of the pre-defined project of the Public Health Initiatives Program, “Improvement of epidemiological health information to support public health decision and management in Portugal. Towards reduced inequalities, improved health, and bilateral cooperation,” that benefits from a 1.500.000€ Grant from Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway through the EEA Grants and Portuguese Government. The authors are grateful to all professionals who were involved in the INSEF implementation and to all INSEF participants.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irina Kislaya.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 34 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kislaya, I., Perelman, J., Tolonen, H. et al. Do self-reported data accurately measure health inequalities in risk factors for cardiovascular disease?. Int J Public Health 64, 721–729 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-019-01232-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-019-01232-1

Keywords

Navigation