Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sediment size influences habitat selection and use by groundwater macrofauna and meiofauna

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Aquatic Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding environmental factors that influence obligate groundwater dwelling (stygobiotic) fauna is crucial for groundwater ecosystem monitoring and management. Field studies have indicated geological factors are a major influence on the abundance and richness of stygofauna, however the precise mechanisms and true influence of the aquifer sediment matrix on biota is unclear. In this study we examined the habitat use and preferences, in terms of sediment particle sizes, of stygobiotic meiofauna (Harpacticoida and Cyclopoida Copepoda), and macroinvertebrates (Amphipoda and Syncarida) using laboratory microcosms. We first tested the ability of each taxon to use (move into) clay (< 0.06 mm), sand (0.3–0.7 mm) and gravel sediments (2–4 mm). Subsequently, the preference for each sediment was compared by examining the distribution of animals in microcosms containing two different sediment types. Both the harpacticoids and cyclopoids were able to use clay, whereas larger amphipods and syncarids mostly remained on the sediment surface. All taxa were able to use sand and gravel substrates. Amphipods preferred gravel over sand and clay. Both copepods and syncarids preferred sand and gravel over clay, but showed no preference between gravel and sand. This study demonstrates the general inability of some stygobiotic macroinvertebrates to use clay sediments and overall differences in sediment use among stygobiotic meio- and macrofauna. From these findings, the typically heterogenous distributions and diversity of stygofauna observed in field studies may be related to variability in sediment composition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asmyhr MG (2013) Biodiversity assessment and conservation of groundwater ecosystems. PhD Thesis. Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia

  • Asmyhr MG, Hose G, Graham P, Stow AJ (2014) Fine-scale genetics of subterranean syncarids. Freshwat Biol 59:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belanger J (2013) Appendage diversity and modes of locomotion: walking. In: Watling L, Theil M (eds) The natural history of crustacea; functional morphology and diversity. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 262–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Bork J, Berkhoff SE, Bork S, Hahn HJ (2008) Using subsurface metazoan fauna to indicate groundwater–surface water interactions in the Nakdong River floodplain, South Korea. Hydrogeol J 17:61–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulton A, Humphreys W, Eberhard S (2003) Imperilled subsurface waters in Australia: biodiversity, threatening processes and conservation. Aquat Ecosyst Health Manag 6:41–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown A, Trueman E (1996) Burrowing behaviour and cost in the sandy-beach oniscid isopod Tylos granulatus Krauss, 1843. Crustaceana 69:425–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Che J, Dorgan KM (2010) It’s tough to be small: dependence of burrowing kinematics on body size. J Exp Biol 213:1241–1250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datry T, Malard F, Gibert J (2005) Response of invertebrate assemblages to increased groundwater recharge rates in a phreatic aquifer. J Nth Am Benthol Soc 24:461–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Descloux S, Datry T, Marmonier P (2013) Benthic and hyporheic invertebrate assemblages along a gradient of increasing streambed colmation by fine sediment. Aquat Sci 75:493–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-013-0295-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Descloux S, Datry T, Usseglio-Polatera P (2014) Trait-based structure of invertebrates along a gradient of sediment colmation: benthos versus hyporheos responses. Sci Total Environ 466–467:265–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Marzio W, Castaldo D, Pantani C, Di Cioccio A, Di Lorenzo T, Sáenz M, Galassi D (2009) Relative sensitivity of hyporheic copepods to chemicals. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 82:488–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dole-Olivier MJ, Galassi D, Marmonier P, Creuzé Des Châtelliers M (2000) The biology and ecology of lotic microcrustaceans. Freshwat Biol 44:63–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorgan KM (2015) The biomechanics of burrowing and boring. J Exp Biol 218:176–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorgan KM, Jumars PA, Johnson B, Boudreau B, Landis E (2005) Burrowing mechanics: burrow extension by crack propagation. Nature 433:475

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dorgan K, Jumars PA, Johnson B, Boudreau B (2006) Macrofaunal burrowing: the medium is the message. Oceanogr Mar Biol Ann Rev 48:85–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Extence CA (1981) The effect of drought on benthic invertebrate communities in a lowland river. Hydrobiologia 83:217–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fattorini S, Borges PAV, Fiasca B, Galassi DMP (2016) Trapped in the web of water: groundwater-fed springs are island-like ecosystems for the meiofauna. Ecol Evol 6:8389–8401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faulkes Z (2013) Morphological adaptations for digging and burrowing. In: Watling L, Theil M (eds) The natural history of crustacea; functional morphology and diversity. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 276–284

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fetter CW (2001) Applied hydrogeology. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiasca B, Stoch F, Olivier MJ, Maazouzi C, Petitta M, Di Cioccio A, Galassi DMP (2014) The dark side of springs: what drives small-scale spatial patterns of subsurface meiofaunal assemblages? J Limnol 73:71–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galassi DM, Huys R, Reid JW (2009) Diversity, ecology and evolution of groundwater copepods. Freshwat Biol 54:691–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibert J, Deharveng L (2002) Subterranean ecosystems: a truncated functional biodiversity. Bioscience 52:473–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glanville K, Schulz C, Tomlinson M, Butler D (2016) Biodiversity and biogeography of groundwater invertebrates in Queensland, Australia. Subterr Biol 17:55–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn HJ (2005) Unbaited phreatic traps: a new method of sampling stygofauna. Limnologica 35:248–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn HJ (2006) The GW-Fauna-Index: a first approach to a quantitative ecological assessment of groundwater habitats. Limnologica 36:119–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn HJ, Matzke D (2005) A comparison of stygofauna communities inside and outside groundwater bores. Limnologica 35:31–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock PJ, Boulton AJ (2008) Stygofauna biodiversity and endemism in four alluvial aquifers in eastern Australia. Invert Syst 22:117–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hervant F, Mathieu J, Barre H, Simon K, Pinon C (1997) Comparative study on the behavioral, ventilatory, and respiratory responses of hypogean and epigean crustaceans to long-term starvation and subsequent feeding. Comp Biochem Physiol A Physiol 118:1277–1283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hervant F, Mathieu J, Messana G (1998) Oxygen consumption and ventilation in declining oxygen tension and posthypoxic recovery in epigean and hypogean crustaceans. J Crustac Biol 18:717–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hose GC, Stumpp C (2019) Architects of the underworld: bioturbation by groundwater invertebrates influences aquifer hydraulic properties. Aquat Sci 81:20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hose GC, Jones P, Lim RP (2005) Hyporheic macroinvertebrates in riffle and pool areas of temporary streams in south-eastern Australia. Hydrobiologia 532:81–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hose GC, Asmyhr MG, Cooper SJB, Humphreys WF (2015a) Down under down under: austral groundwater life. In: Stow A, Maclean N, Holwell GI (eds) Austral ark. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 512–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Hose GC, Sreekanth J, Barron O, Pollino C (2015) Stygofauna in Australian Groundwater Systems: Extent of knowledge. In: Report to Australian Coal Association Research Program. Macquarie University and CSIRO

  • Hose GC, Symington K, Lott MJ, Lategan MJ (2016) The toxicity of arsenic (III), chromium (VI) and zinc to groundwater copepods. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:18704–18713

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hose GC, Fryirs KA, Bailey J, Ashby N, White T, Stumpp C (2017) Different depths, different fauna: habitat influences on the distribution of groundwater invertebrates. Hydrobiologia 797:145–157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys WF (2006) Aquifers: the ultimate groundwater-dependent ecosystems. Aust J Bot 54:115–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johns T, Jones JI, Knight L, Maurice L, Wood P, Robertson A (2015) Regional-scale drivers of groundwater faunal distributions. Freshwat Sci 34:316–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korbel KL, Hose GC (2015) Habitat, water quality, seasonality, or site? Identifying environmental correlates of the distribution of groundwater biota. Freshwat Sci 34:329–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korbel KL, Hose GC (2017) The weighted groundwater health index: improving the monitoring and management of groundwater resources. Ecol Ind 75:164–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korbel KL, Hancock PJ, Serov P, Lim RP, Hose GC (2013a) Groundwater ecosystems vary with land use across a mixed agricultural landscape. J Environ Qual 42:380–390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Korbel KL, Lim RP, Hose GC (2013b) An inter-catchment comparison of groundwater biota in the cotton-growing region of north-western New South Wales. Crop Pasture Sci 64:1195–1208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korbel K, Chariton A, Stephenson S, Greenfield P, Hose GC (2017) Wells provide a distorted view of life in the aquifer: implications for sampling, monitoring and assessment of groundwater ecosystems. Sci Rep 7:40702

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mathers KL, Millett J, Robertson AL, Stubbington R, Wood PJ (2014) Faunal response to benthic and hyporheic sedimentation varies with direction of vertical hydrological exchange. Freshwat Biol 59:2278–2289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathers KL, Hill MJ, Wood PJ (2017) Benthic and hyporheic macroinvertebrate distribution within the heads and tails of riffles during baseflow conditions. Hydrobiologia 794:17–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mermillod-Blondin F, Winiarski T, Foulquier A, Perrissin A, Marmonier P (2015) Links between sediment structures and ecological processes in the hyporheic zone: ground-penetrating radar as a non-invasive tool to detect subsurface biologically active zones. Ecohydrology 8:626–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rau GC, Halloran LJ, Cuthber MO, Andersen MS, Acworth RI, Tellam JH (2017) Characterising the dynamics of surface water–groundwater interactions in intermittent and ephemeral streams using streambed thermal signatures. Adv Water Res 107:354–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt SI, Hellweg J, Hahn HJ, Hatton TJ, Humphreys WF (2007) Does groundwater influence the sediment fauna beneath a small, sandy stream? Limnologica 37:208–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sket B (2008) Can we agree on an ecological classification of subterranean animals? J Nat Hist 42:1549–1566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen JPR, Maurice L, Edwards FK, Lapworth DJ, Read DS, Allen D, Butcher AS, Newbold LK, Townsend BR, Williams PJ (2013) Using boreholes as windows into groundwater ecosystems. PLoS One 8:e70264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stakman W (1966) The relation between particle size, pore size and hydraulic conductivity of sand separates. In: Proceedings of the Wageningen Symposium. Water in the unsaturated zone. International Association of Scientific Hydrology, The Netherlands, pp 373–384

  • Stanford JA, Ward J (1993) An ecosystem perspective of alluvial rivers: connectivity and the hyporheic corridor. J N Am Benthol Soc 12:48–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoch F, Artheau M, Brancelj A, Galassi DM, Malard F (2009) Biodiversity indicators in European ground waters: towards a predictive model of stygobiotic species richness. Freshwat Biol 4:745–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbington R, Greenwood AM, Wood PJ, Armitage PD, Gunn J, Robertson AL (2009) The response of perennial and temporary headwater stream invertebrate communities to hydrological extremes. Hydrobiologia 630:299–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbington R, Wood PJ, Reid I, Gunn J (2011) Benthic and hyporheic invertebrate community responses to seasonal flow recession in a groundwater-dominated stream. Ecohydrology 4:500–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbington R, Boulton AJ, Little S, Wood PJ (2015) Changes in invertebrate assemblage composition in benthic and hyporheic zones during a severe supraseasonal drought. Freshwat Sci 34:344–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stumpp C, Hose GC (2013) The impact of water table drawdown and drying on subterranean aquatic fauna in in vitro experiments. PLoS One 8:e78502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stumpp C, Hose GC (2017) Groundwater amphipods alter aquifer sediment structure. Hydrolog Proc 31:3452–3454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson M (2008) A framework for determining environmental water requirements for alluvial aquifer ecosystems. PhD Thesis. University of New England, Armidale, Australia

  • Vadher AN, Stubbington R, Wood PJ (2015) Fine sediment reduces vertical migrations of Gammarus pulex (Crustacea: Amphipoda) in response to surface water loss. Hydrobiologia 753:61–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vadher AN, Leigh C, Millett J, Stubbington R, Wood PJ (2017) Vertical movements through subsurface stream sediments by benthic macroinvertebrates during experimental drying are influenced by sediment characteristics and species traits. Freshwat Biol 62:1730–1740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vander Vorste R, Malard F, Datry T (2016) Is drift the primary process promoting the resilience of river invertebrate communities? A manipulative field experiment in an intermittent alluvial river. Freshwat Biol 61:1276–1292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viola SM, Hubbard DM, Dugan JE, Schooler NK (2014) Burrowing inhibition by fine textured beach fill: implications for recovery of beach ecosystems. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 150:142–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wentworth CK (1922) A scale of grade and class terms for clastic sediments. J Geol 30:377–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White T (2018) The effect of drawdown on the movement of groundwater invertebrates. In: Unpublished Maters thesis. Macquarie University, Australia

  • Wood P, Armitage PD (1997) Biological effects of fine sediment in the lotic environment. Environ Manag 21:203–217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the Cotton Research and Development Corporation project MQ1501 and Australian Research Council project LP130100508. We are grateful for the thoughtful and constructive comments provided by three anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109, Australia

    Kathryn L. Korbel & Grant C. Hose

  2. CSIRO, Oceans and Atmosphere Division, Sydney, Australia

    Sarah Stephenson

Authors
  1. Kathryn L. Korbel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sarah Stephenson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Grant C. Hose
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathryn L. Korbel.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 13 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Korbel, K.L., Stephenson, S. & Hose, G.C. Sediment size influences habitat selection and use by groundwater macrofauna and meiofauna. Aquat Sci 81, 39 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-019-0636-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-019-0636-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation